Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton is out to destroy Bill Windsor

Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton is out to destroy Bill Windsor, a 74-year-old veteran whose life has been ruined by Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton and his associates.

Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton is one sick puppy.

William M. Windsor has never had any dealings with Jeffrey L. Ashton, so why is he doing this?  He must have at least a rudimentary knowledge of the law.  But he wouldn’t know due process if it bit him repeatedly on his fat ass.  Now even that’s hard to believe.

Money WadHas he been paid off by AIG and Boise Cascade?  Or does he just hate pro se parties; he had to deal with a lot of them as a persecutor.

I imagine he hates people like me who are more intelligent than he is.

Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton is a HUGE Liar

Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton is a HUGE Liar
Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton is a HUGE Liar

THE COURT (Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton): “Mr. Windsor, you e-mailed my JA 214 times since Thursday. Since Thursday.

WINDSOR: “Absolutely not, Your Honor.

THE COURT (Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton): “Well, you’re calling my secretary a liar and I know that she’s telling me the truth about that, so that ain’t going to happen. So I’ll block you from e-mail, again. If you have a lawyer that wants to communicate with us on your behalf, we will be happy to speak with him.” [EXHIBIT A – Transcript of Hearing 4/5/2021 – P.36: 9-25; P.37: 1-25; P.38: 1-4.]

I sent three emails to Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton’s Judicial Assistant from Thursday April 1, 2021 to Monday April 5, 2021. THREE (3) not 214.  Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton is a liar, and calling me a liar in open court is a violation of the Code of Judicial Conduct.

I have every email saved on my computer, and I will be filing each and every one of them with the clerk as evidence.

I am not and will not receive a fair trial in the Ninth Judicial Circuit Court in Orange County, Florida due to the bias of Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton of that court against me and prejudice in favor of the Defendants and their attorney.

Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton Issued 4 More Orders Against Windsor in February 2021

Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton Issued 4 More Orders Against Windsor in February 2021.

Running Total for Corrupt Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton:

Windsor = 0 … DEFENDANTS = 9.

It was 22 months before William Windsor finally had a ruling somewhat in his favor when the judge set the case for trial.  But the reality is that Jeff Ashton was simply ready to strike the death blow.  In 797 days as the judge in this case as of 3/8/2023, Judge Jeff Ashton never granted one single, solitary motion by the Plaintiff, WINDSOR.

Jeff Ashton is so corrupt that he can’t even figure out how to fake it.  To keep everyone from realizing you are a crook, you throw the good guy a would-be-bone every once in a while.  Jeff Ashton is too stupid to have thought of that.  He’s probably preoccupied playing with his Sex Toys.

3803 ORDER-Granting-Defendants-Motion-for-Attorney-Fees-and-Costs-2021-02-05-09-59-02-AM 2021-02-05 09-59-02-AM
3473 PLAINTIFF-Motion-for-Reconsideration-of-02-04-2021-ORDER 2021-02-14 14-13-45-PM
3574 PLAINTIFF-Petition-for-Writ-of-Prohibition-2021-02-05-06-37-49-AM 2021-02-15 06-37-49-AM
3814 ORDER-on-Defendants-Motion-for-Reconsideration-on- 2-4-2021-Order-of- Judge-Jeffrey-L-Ashton-2021-02-16-15-34-26-PM 2021-02-16 15-34-26-PM
3511 DEFENDANTS-Motion-to-require-pro-se-Plaintiff-William-Windsors-Submissions-to-the-Court-be-reviewed-approved-and-signed-by-a-member-of-the-Florida-Bar-2021-02-17-16-47-35-PM 2021-02-17 16-47-35-PM
3767 PLAINTIFF-Notice-of-Unavailability-2021-02-17-17-21-31-PM 2021-02-17 17-12-31-PM
3835 PLAINTIFF-Motion-to-Strike-Defendants-Emergency-Motion-to-Require-Pro-Se-Plaintiffs-Submissions-to-the-Court-be-Reviewed-by-Member-of-Florida-Bar-2021-02-18-16-22-20-PM 2021-02-18 16-22-20-PM
3794 ORDER-Denying-Plaintiffs-Motion-for-Reconsideration-of-2-4-2021-Order-of- Judge-Jeffrey-L-Ashton-2021-02-19-17-20-01-PM 2021-02-19 17-20-01-PM
3604 DEFENDANTS-Notice-of-Hearing-APRIL-6TH-2021-at-10-15-AM-2021-02-22-12-02-19-PM 2021-02-22 12-02-19-PM
3789 ORDER-Denying-Motion-to-Strike-Defendants-Emergency-Motion-to-Require-Pro-Se-Plaintiffs-Submissions-to-the-Court-be-Reviewed-by-Member-of-Florida-Bar-2021-02-23-15-43-27-PM 2021-02-23 15-43-27-PM
3573 PLAINTIFF-Notice-of-Filing-Letter-to-Judge-Jeffrey-L-Ashton-2021-02-25-23-22-23-PM 2021-02-25 23-22-23-PM
3435 PLAINTIFF-Memorandum-of-Law-Regarding-Pleadings-Signed-by-a-Member-of-the-Florida-Bar-2021-02-26-22-51-31-PM 2021-02-26 22-51-31-PM
3470 PLAINTIFF-Motion-for-Reconsideration-of-Motion-to-Strike-Defendants-Emergency-Motion-to-Require-Pro-Se-Plaintiffs-Submissions-to-the-Court-be-Reviewed-by-Member-of-Florida-Bar-2021-02-26-23-57-05-PM 2021-02-26 23-57-05-PM

Motion to Disqualify Judge Jeffrey L Ashton filed with Affidavit of Prejudice

William M. Windsor has filed an Affidavit of Prejudice with his First Motion to Disqualify Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton in Case 2018-CA-010270-O in the Ninth Judicial Circuit in Orange County Florida.

This was filed less than one month after Jeff Ashton appeared as judge in the case that had been pending for years.

WILLIAM M. WINDSOR’S AFFIDAVIT OF PREJUDICE

OF JUDGE JEFFREY L. ASHTON

I, William M. Windsor, the undersigned, hereby declare under penalty of perjury:

  1. My name is William M. Windsor (“Windsor”). I will be 72-years-old on Friday, am absolutely competent to testify and represent myself, and have personal knowledge of the matters stated herein.
  2. This Affidavit of Prejudice of Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton (“Affidavit of Prejudice”) is offered in support of the Motion to Disqualify Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton (“Motion to Disqualify”).
  3. I am the Plaintiff in this action, and I am representing myself pro se.
  4. I am not an attorney. However, I have studied law, and I know improper actions by attorneys and judges when I see them.  I see them in this case!
  5. I will not receive a fair trial in the Ninth Judicial Circuit Court in Orange County, Florida due to the prejudice of Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton (“Judge Ashton”) of that court against me and bias in favor of the Defendants and their attorneys.
  6. I first came to the realization on February 1, 2021 that Judge Ashton was prejudiced and biased in this case.
  7. I fear that I have not received and will not receive a fair trial with Judge Ashton. Judge Ashton is heartless and dishonest.
  8. Attached as EXHIBIT 1 is an affidavit I filed today. It is referenced and incorporated herein.  It details my issues with Judge Ashton as to my current medical emergency.  Judge Ashton refuses to delay a relatively meaningless hearing in this case about the DEFENDANTS disabling me and using the court system to inflict emotional distress.  As I type this, I can’t see much out of my left eye.
  9. Judge Ashton has OUTRAGEOUSLY refused to reschedule a 2/2/2021 hearing with no justification whatsoever. This is bias at its almost worse.
  10. But that he refused to reschedule the 2/2/2021 hearing when Windsor has a medical emergency is bias at its worst.
  11. Judge Ashton could care less about Windsor, and the feeling is now more than mutual.
  12. Windsor has not been treated fairly by Judge Ashton. Judge Ashton has not demonstrated the impartiality required of a judge.  He is demonstrating that he is a heartless person who has no business sitting in judgment on people.
  13. Windsor has a well-grounded fear that he will not receive a fair trial. Judge Ashton has ignored all of the prejudice and bias of Judge Kest, and he refused without proper consideration Windsor’s request to reconsider the corrupt orders of Judge Kest.
  14. Judge Munyon granted a protective order to stop discovery when there was no legal authority to do so.  Judge Kest allowed that to continue.  Judge Kest allowed hearings on frivolous motions by the Defendants while ignoring violations of his own rules and orders.  Judge Kest outrageously stated in an order that two motions were not being set for hearings because they were motions for reconsideration when clearly they were no such thing.  Judge Kest claimed Windsor made a false statement to the Court denying that the case had been stayed.  The case was never stayed, and saying Windsor made a false statement to the Court was both improper and erroneous.  Judge Kest ignored the fact that there was no legal basis given by the Defendants for either of the motions that Judge Kest ordered to be set for hearing.  Judge Kest extended the trial date for another year when he will not even be a judge, with no consideration given to Windsor’s medical condition.  Judge Kest announced at the Case Management Conference that he treats pro se parties the same as attorneys, but this is neither fair nor the law.  Judge Kest indicated at the Case Management Conference that he had independently researched cases that Windsor had been involved in, and he threatened him with sanctions for frivolous motions under Florida Statute 57.105.  Windsor has never filed anything frivolous.  Judge Kest argued with Windsor over whether there had been the required “meet and confer” with the Defendants’ attorneys.  Judge Kest claimed that a telephone bullying by Attorney Asstrin amounted to a “confer.”  Windsor tried to explain that confer means an actual discussion.  Judge Kest rejected that, yet he knew the specifics of the law while pro se Windsor did not.  Windsor was absolutely right about the requirements to confer, and Judge Kest lied and claimed he was wrong.  Judge Kest is a past president and Governor of the Bar Association, so he has been a very active member of a club that the Defense attorneys belong to that Windsor will never belong to.  Judge Kest has been an attorney for 48 years and a judge for 17 years.  He has seemingly developed disdain for pro se parties over the past 48 years.  Windsor has these feelings because after studying the developments in this case, he saw Judge Kest acting with bias again and again.  Judge Ashton dismissed without any consideration Windsor’s motion to have him reconsider Judge Kest’s orders.  No honest judge could do that.
  15. This Affidavit of Prejudice clearly provides the facts and reasons for the belief that bias and prejudice exists. Dates, times, places, circumstances, and statements are itemized.
  16. Judge Ashton established a clearly fixed view about substantive pending trial matters, so this must raise concerns about the “appearance of impropriety,” a standard that must be safeguarded under applicable recusal law.
  17. Judge Ashton has violated my civil and constitutional rights under color of law.
  18. Judge Ashton has effectively denied my rights of the equal protection under the law under Article VI of the Constitution.
  19. Judge Ashton’s actions prove that he has exercised his power in this civil action for his own personal purposes rather than the will of the law or the common decency of man.
  20. I will not get a fair and impartial trial with Judge Ashton. He is prejudiced against me.  He has already committed an unforgivable sin in this case by refusing to reconsider orders of Judge Kest that were issued without the required hearings.  Judge Ashton acts like he is simply another in a string of corrupt Orange County judges who either dislike pro se parties or love insurance agencies with deep pockets.
  21. All I want is to have someone fair and impartial with an open mind to listen to the facts and review as much of the evidence as is needed to prove each of my claims. It is obvious to me that Judge Ashton doesn’t care about the facts and doesn’t want to apply the law.
  22. The United States Constitution guarantees an unbiased Judge who will always provide litigants with full protection of ALL RIGHTS.   Judge Ashton is biased against me. Judge Ashton has demonstrated this.
  23. This motion, affidavit, certificate of good faith, and memorandum of authorities meet the requirements for a motion to disqualify.
  24. This Affidavit of Prejudice states the facts and the reasons for the belief that bias and prejudice exist. The reasons for the belief are material and stated with particularity.
  25. I have a well-grounded fear that I will not receive a fair trial.
  26. This affidavit meets the time requirement of Rule 2.330 of the Florida Rules of Judicial Administration which provides that a motion for recusal “shall be filed “within a reasonable time not to exceed 10 days after discovery of the facts constituting the grounds….” It was on February 1, 2021 that I discovered grounds.
  27. This affidavit is accompanied by a “certificate of counsel of record.” As I am the only person of record and I am a pro se Plaintiff, the certificate is from me, and it is made in good faith.
  28. There has not been a previous motion to disqualify Judge Ashton.

FURTHER SAITH AFFIANT NOT.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed this 1st day of February, 2021.

Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton ignored William Windsor’s Medical Emergency in 2021.

On 2/1/2021, I had a medical emergency with my left eye.  I have had three surgeries on that eye.

I first came to the realization on February 1, 2021 that Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton was prejudiced and biased in this case.

I fear that I have not received and will not receive a fair trial with Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton. Judge Jeff Ashton is heartless and dishonest.

I prepared the following affidavit and it was filed on 2/1/2021.  It details my issues with Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton as to my medical emergency.   Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton refused to delay a relatively meaningless hearing in this case about the DEFENDANTS disabling me and using the court system to inflict emotional distress.  As I typed it, I couldn’t see much out of my left eye.

VERIFIED AFFIDAVIT OF WILLIAM M. WINDSOR DATED 2/1/2021

I, William M. Windsor, the undersigned, hereby declare under penalty of perjury:

    1. I am over the age of 21, a living person, am competent to testify, and have personal knowledge of the matters stated herein.
    2. I object to the Court’s plans to hold a hearing tomorrow that I will be unable to attend.
    3. I am 72-years-old and in poor health since the Defendants’ 18-wheeler hit me at 70-miles-per-hour. I am in constant pain from nine herniated disks in my neck and back, and walking is a problem.  I was in excellent shape before the accident.  I am currently experiencing several medical emergencies.
    4. I broke a tooth, and it is extremely painful. I’m having serious problems with my left eye.  And I may be having a significant side effect from a COVID-19 vaccination.  I find this Court’s void of compassion to be absolutely unacceptable for any human being.
    5. As I have previously communicated, I received notice from the Court’s Judicial Assistant too late to prepare for a 2/2/21 hearing. It was impossible to meet the deadlines set by the Judicial Assistant in a command sent to me.  As I communicated to this Court by motion, I also need to subpoena the attorneys for the Defendants prior to a hearing on attorney’s fees.  Pro se parties do not have subpoena rights, so I have to drive to Orlando to obtain subpoenas from the Clerk of the Court.  The attorneys for the Defendants have ignored my requests to take their depositions.  The attorney for the Defendants recently filed an affidavit that requires investigation.  I received it too late to do anything about it.  The examination of the attorneys is likely to take several hours.  I have found the attorneys to be extremely dishonest.  The attorney for the Defendants could not have spent more than 15 minutes on the motion to compel that resulted in sanctions.
    6. I have essentially no money. I have been declared indigent by the Texas Supreme Court and the United States Supreme Court.  EXHIBIT A is my motion for in forma pauperis approved by the U.S. Supreme Court.  My debts exceed $1,100,000, and I haven’t been able to pay credit card bills for over a year.  My total debt reduced from $1,500,000 to $1,169,000 since tis was prepared due to settlement with Sean D. Fleming for $1 and release of my claims against him.  My total monthly expenses at present are $83,527 if I were to pay all my past due credit card bills.  My only assets are $1,000 equity in my vehicle and $60,000 in a condo, my homestead.  My secured debts exceed my assets.  I believe all of my assets will be protected in bankruptcy.  I believe the condo association will try to foreclose as I haven’t paid the $600 monthly “dues” for four months.  If that happens, I will have to file bankruptcy.  I have been working to stay afloat until I receive a large financial award from the jury in this case.
    7. Sanctions are supposed to be based on an ability to pay. I have no ability to pay.  I will begrudgingly agree to have $100 deducted from the payment I receive from this lawsuit.
    8. I filed a motion to have Judge Ashton reconsider the outlandish orders of Judge Kest. It was just denied.  I find this outrageous.  It seems Judge Ashton is just as biased as Judge Kest.  Denying this motion without considering the evidence or holding a hearing is absolutely improper.
    9. The Fifth District has made it clear that the trial court has the inherent discretionary power to reconsider any order entered prior to the rendition of final judgment in the cause. (Arnold v. Massebeau, 493 So. 2d 91 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986).) (See also North Shore Hospital, Inc. v. Barber, 143 So.2d 849 (Fla.1962); Commercial Garden Mall v. Success Academy, Inc., 453 So.2d 934 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984). Cf. Associated Medical Institutions, Inc. v. Imperatori, 338 So.2d 74 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); Rubin v. Baker, 276 So.2d 532 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973).)  The only reason I can think of to deny the motion and do so without a hearing is prejudice.  The only reason I can think of to deny a continuance of the hearing set for 2/2/2021 when I cannot participate is extreme prejudice.  Judge Ashton provided NO reasons for his orders.  The U.S. Supreme Court stated in Corcoran v. Levenhagen, 08–10495, decided October 20, 2009, that courts should explain their orders.
    10. I object to the hearing and being denied my rights to have the corrupt acts of Judge Kest and the monumental wrongdoing of the Defendants and their attorneys properly considered by this Court. I object to the denial of my motion for reconsideration of the corrupt acts of Judge Kest.
    11. I will file a motion to disqualify Judge Ashton, and I will file an appeal. These are my legal rights.
    12. In 2011, I had two cataract surgeries. The surgery on both eyes caused problems, including a hole poked into the retina of my left eye by the surgeon.  I began “seeing things.”  It began with what could best be described as a fireworks show “in my eyes” when my eyes were closed in bed at night.  Then I saw big flies and even bigger roaches all around my desk.  At first, they seemed real.  Next came a curtain closing back and forth across my field of vision.  It started as a shear and ended up a solid red.
    13. I raced to the eye doctor in Atlanta, Georgia. The doctors discovered a hole in the retina of my left eye.  My left eye was quickly scheduled for surgery.  I was sent home with eye patches to cover both eyes, and I was instructed to do nothing but recline with my head in a slightly-elevated position.  Both eyes were done a week apart.  The left eye had the retina repaired, and both eves had a “vitrectomy,” surgery in which the vitreous gel-like substance is removed.  It is what fills the middle portion of the eye.  I believe my gel was replaced with saline solution.  I used to have floaters, but they were removed.  The strange visions went away, but it took a long time to recover my reading eyesight.  My vision has been 20/20 after the cataract-replacement lenses were implanted in my eyes.  For a week or so, my reading vision has become poor.
    14. In 2016, I was diagnosed with Glaucoma. It had been at least two years since my eyes had been examined, and I lost some of my peripheral vision due to the Glaucoma.  In 2018 and 2019, I had two more eye surgeries in Leesburg with Dr. Stacia Goldee of Mid-Florida Eye Center.
    15. Last Friday, I had the first COVID-19 vaccination. That night, I saw a ghost.  I’d never seen a ghost before, but I saw a ghost.  It was a slender brunette, very animated, talking with someone in the kitchen.  I was not asleep or dreaming.  I “saw” this while awake at night.  I snapped a photo, and it is dark and spooky-looking, but doesn’t show a “ghost.”  I would attach it, but it’s just a dark blur.
    16. The ghost did not return the next night, so I chalked it up to perhaps some type of reaction from the vaccination. A few days later, the ghost returned.  Same woman; same outfit; same place in the kitchen.  I snapped a photo, but it doesn’t show a ghost – just a squiggly green neon flash where the ghost was.  I would have been totally freaked out from all of this if it wasn’t for my experience following eye surgery in 2011.
    17. This all sounds pretty crazy, but Google reports that “hallucinations” are a side effect of COVID-19 and the COVID-19 vaccine. There are some bizarre videos on YouTube with people telling their COVID hallucination stories.
    18. I have become concerned that the problem may be related to the retina in my left eye. My left eye has been cloudy and moderately painful of late.  My vision has become very poor out of my left eye, and the imbalance between my eyes makes me dizzy.  Unfortunately, I missed my regular Glaucoma check-ups due to the Pandemic; I’m supposed to be checked every six months, and it has been a year.  I tried on Friday to get an appointment with the eye doctor I had used, but she does not accept the Cigna HMO Medicare Insurance that I have as of January 1, 2021 without a referral from the primary care doctor.  That primary care doctor is new; I have never seen him, and I was unable to get a referral without first scheduling a full physical.  I spoke with a nice lady there this morning, and she isn’t sure they accept my insurance.  She asked me to bring the insurance card to their office to check, so I did.  They do accept my insurance, but the first available appointment is March 23.
    19. I called Cigna to see what I can do. They were of little or no help.  They referred me to Dr. Courtney Bovee, an ophthalmologist I have seen before, a doctor I really respect and like.  I called Mid-Florida Eye Center to learn she is no longer with them, and they do not take my insurance.  The surgeon who operated on my eyes twice, Dr. Stacia Goldee, is no longer with the firm either, apparently retired.  I have called and left messages with the office of Dr. Anisha Patel, the last eye doctor I have seen.
    20. I have been on hold with Moderna for a half hour to report my potential side effect from the COVID-19 vaccine. I was just cut off and had to leave a message.  I’m supposed to hear back in 24 hours.
    21. I see Dr. Golub at 10:30 a.m. on Tuesday and go to the hospital at 11:00 am.
    22. I have been approved by Cigna to go to the Emergency Room, and I will be there Tuesday morning at about 11:00 a.m. My eyes will be dilated, and an ophthalmologist will examine my retinas.  The concern is that I have a vitreous detachment.  Over time, the vitreous can shrink and slowly detach from your retina.  Posterior Vitreous Detachment can cause health issues and can lead to permanent vision loss.  This can cause a tear in the retina or a hole in the eye nerve.  Those of us who are nearsighted, have had cataract surgery (and I’ve had four), or who have had some kind of trauma to the eyes are at a higher risk for PVD.  I am told that this is very common at age 72, and I am in a high-risk category.  This is not something I can or will ignore.

FURTHER SAITH AFFIANT NOT.

Sworn under penalty of perjury this 1st day of February, 2021,

_________________________________

William M. Windsor

Judge Jeff Ashton OUTRAGEOUSLY refused to reschedule a 2/2/2021 hearing with no justification whatsoever.  This is bias at its almost worse.

But that he refused to reschedule the 2/2/2021 hearing when I had a medical emergency is bias at its worst.

Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton could care less about me, and the feeling is now more than mutual.

I was not treated the impartiality required of a judge.   Jeff Ashton demonstrated that he is a heartless person who has no business sitting in judgment on people.

I have come to realize that he was pre-programmed to rule against me on anything and everything.  I believe he was either instructed to do this by the Criminal Racketeering Operation at work in Orange County, or he was pad off.

I had a well-grounded fear that I would not receive a fair trial.  Judge Jeff Ashton has ignored all of the prejudice and bias of Judge Kest, and he refused without proper consideration Windsor’s request to reconsider the corrupt orders of Judge Kest.

It was all corruption, loud and clear.

How did Bill Windsor get on Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton’s Radar Screen?

How did Bill Windsor get on Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton’s Radar Screen?

By becoming the third judge in Bill Windsor’s case against the 18-Wheeler that almost killed him twice.

Bill Windsor believes Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton appeared in the case solely for the purpose of damaging William Windsor and ensuring that he would lose.

Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton somehow took over Case 201`8-CA-010270-O following the retirement of Judge John Marshall Kest.  The Docket does not show an assignment of Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton while an 8/25/2020 Docket Entry showed the assignment to Judge John Marshall Kest following Judge Lisa T. Munyon’s recusal.

Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton first showed up in the case on `1/28/2021 when he denied William Windsor’s Motion for Stay.  Within five days, he entered five orders adverse to Windsor and five orders favorable to the Defendants.

It took Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton just 54 minutes to enter an Order denying William Windsor’s 42-page Motion to Disqualify or Recuse that cited 48 cases, multiple statutes and rules and the Constitution.   He couldn’t even read 42 pages that quickly much less research anything.  His claim about the documents (he couldn’t have even read) was that “Adverse rulings do not support a reasonable fear of personal bias. Rivera v. State, 717 So. 2d 477 (Fla. 1998).”  Windsor’s Motion to Disqualify or Recuse included far more.  Jeff Ashton didn’t address what he obviously didn’t read.  He violated the rules, as he always did.

Rivera was a prisoner under sentence of death.  The ruling in the case is much more than a claim about prior decisions.  The Court said: “We have repeatedly held that a motion to disqualify a judge ‘must be well-founded and contain facts germane to the judge’s undue bias, prejudice, or sympathy.'”  “Rivera did not proffer legally sufficient reasons requiring the judge’s disqualification.”

Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton is simply corrupt.

On 1/30/2021, William Windsor filed a Second Emergency Motion for Stay as a hearing was scheduled for 2/2/2021 when Windsor would be in the hospital.

Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton held a hearing without William Windsor on 2/2/2021.  The Court Minutes show he refused to reconsider orders of Judge John Marshall Kest that were issued without the required hearings.  He awarded $2,500 in sanctions against Bill Windsor for doing nothing improper and completely ignoring Windsor’s indigence and inability to pay.

Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton is simply corrupt, evil, dishonest, and a liar.

3515 PLAINTIFF-Motion-for-Stay-and-or-Continuance 2021-01-27 19-47-35-PM
3526 Notice Request-for-Cancellation of Hearing for 02/02/2021 2021-01-27 20-19-54-PM
3788 Order Denying Motion to Stay and/or Continue 2021-01-28 17-08-21-PM
3463 Motion for Reconsideration of Emergency Motion for Stay and/or Continuance 2021-01-28 18-28-49-PM
3514 Motion to Stay AND CONTINUANCE by WILLIAM M. WINDSOR 2021-01-30 06-33-18-AM
3471 Motion for Reconsideration WILLIAM M. WINDSOR 2021-01-31 05-42-17-AM
3472 Motion for Reconsideration WILLIAM M. WINDSOR 2021-01-31 15-34-13-PM
866 Email-to-Scott-L-Astrin-2021-02-01-09-48-00-AM-SERVICE-Emergency-Motion 2021-02-01 09-48-00-AM
3781 Order Denying  plaintiff’s emergency motion for reconsideration of orders of Judge John Marshall Kest 2021-02-01 10-13-28-AM
3782 Order Denying  plaintiff’s emergency motion to stay and/or continuance 2021-02-01 17-08-21-PM
3562 AFFIDAVIT OF WILLIAM M. WINDSOR DATED FEBRUARY 1, 2021-medical-emergency-indigent 2021-02-02 04-07-19-AM
3256 Affidavit OF PREJUDICE OF JUDGE JEFFREY L. ASHTON 2021-02-02 10-09-12-AM
3505

4051

Motion to Disqualify or Recuse IS FILED IN GOOD FAITH

Motion to Disqualify or Recuse

2021-02-02

2021-02-02

10-09-12-AM

10-09-12-AM

3358 Court Minutes 2021-02-02 11-03-00-AM
3401 HEARING – Motion – Ashton, Jeffrey L (Actual: Ashton, Jeffrey L)02/01/2021Order Denying  plaintiff’s emergency motion for reconsideration of orders of Judge John Marshall Kest 2021-02-02 11-03-00-AM
3790 Order Denying Petitioner’s motion to disqualify Judge-Jeffrey-L-Ashton 2021-02-02 11-03-51-AM

It was clear to Bill Windsor that Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton was prejudiced and biased.  Looking back after all that has happened since, Bill Windsor believes Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton appeared in the case solely for the purpose of damaging William Windsor and ensuring that he would lose.  Jeff Ashton is corrupt.  I wonder how many defendants he abused as a prosecutor.  I plan to contact every law firm that was on the losing side when dealing with Jeffrey L. Ashton.  I’d be happy if Jeff Ashton spends the rest of his life in prison.

Bill Windsor was disabled on May 5, 2017, and he’s lived in pain 24/7

I was almost killed on May 5, 2017.

I first saw a doctor that day.  I’ve seen literally dozens since.

On May 26, 2017, I had eye surgery.  This had been scheduled for months.  I was out of commission for two weeks.  Prior to the surgery, I went back to LRUC Urgent Care in Mount Dora for a pre-op check.  Dr. Johnson was not there.  I was told that I needed to get a primary care doctor who would refer me to a surgeon.  I called the hospital’s physician referral service, but the doctors I was referred to did not return my calls.  I was finally referred to Dr. Eduardo Parra Davila, an abdominal surgeon.  I took the first appointment that was available.

The pain and discomfort in my abdomen had continued since the accident.  It had not lessened at all.  I could no longer sleep in a bed.

On June 13, 2017, I saw Dr. Eduardo Parra-Davila at Celebration Center for Surgery.  I complained that my abdomen was very painful and that my intestines were poking out from the left, right, and center of my abdomen.  He observed the bulging of my abdomen when I reclined and got up off the examining table.  He sent me for a CT-Scan of my abdomen and pelvis.

Dr. Eduardo Parra-Davila

Celebration Center for Surgery

410 Celebration Place, Suite 302
Celebration, FL 34747

407-303-3824
Fax: 407-303-3825

Progressive was paying all of the doctors and all of the testing until my coverage ran out.

On June 15, 2017, I purchased a 2009 Pontiac Solstice the car.  I paid $11,436.44.  I spent two nights in hotels.  I had to pay sales tax on the purchase when I titled the car in Florida.  I turned in my Enterprise car there.

On June 19, 2017, a hearing was held in Ocoee, Florida on the Citation that I was given.  It was continued until August 8, 2017 because I was injured and injury cases must be heard by a judge.

On June 20, 2017, I went to Radiology Specialists of Florida.  I had a CT-Scan of my abdomen and pelvis.

Radiology Specialists of Florida

PO Box 864552

Orlando, Florida 32886-4552

866-481-7571

On July 11, 2017, I again saw Dr. Eduardo Parra-Davila at Celebration Center for Surgery. [EXHIBIT 274.]  He indicated that the CT-Scan of my abdomen and pelvis did not show hernias, but it did show problems with my spine.  He said I have an extremely thin abdominal wall, but the accident did not cause tears.  I am not sure if he said I had diastasis recti.  I decided I should get a second opinion because my intestines poke way out in three spots.  My abdomen was not like that prior to the surgery.  The radiologist did note “apparent postoperative change in the periumbilical region….”

On July 13, 2017, I saw Dr. Jose Lopez at Central Florida Total Health Care. [EXHIBIT 274.]  I was referred by Dr. Parra-Davila because the CT-Scan showed issues with my spine.  He sent me for a CT-Scan of my lumbar spine.  He also ordered two echocardiograms.

Dr. Jose Lopez

Central Florida Total Health Care

30 Remington Road, Suite 2

Oakland, Florida 34787-9797

407-392-1919

Fax: 407-392-1917

On July 15, 2017, I saw a technician at the offices of Dr. Jose Lopez of Central Florida Total Health Care.  I had two echocardiograms.

On July 19, 2017, Dr. Jose Lopez had me get a number of tests at Florida Hospital Waterman. [EXHIBIT 279.]   Dr. Deborah L. Zeagler was the Laboratory Medical Director.

On July 20, 2017, I had a CT-Scan of my abdomen and pelvis at Florida Hospital Waterman due to abdominal pain. [EXHIBIT 278.]  Dr. Fred S. Wittenstein recognized apparent postoperative change in the periumbilical region without herniation.  He cited degenerative change in the spine – Bilateral L5 Spondylolysis – Facet Disease.  He noted a cyst on my left kidney.  He said “Stomach is now well distended.”  Diverticulosis without diverticulitis.  They billed $87,098.02 to Progressive Insurance. [EXHIBIT 277.]

On July 24, 2017, I went to Radiology Specialists of Florida.  I had a CT-Scan of my lumbar spine.

Radiology Specialists of Florida

PO Box 864552

Orlando, Florida 32886-4552

(866) 481-7571

Florida Hospital Waterman diagnosed me with Spondylosis in the lumbar region, Spinal Stenosis in the lumbar region, Spondylosis without myelopathy or radiculopathy in the lumbar region, and Calculus of Kidney. [EXHIBIT 236.]

On August 8, 2017, I saw Dr. Jose Lopez at Central Florida Total Health Care. [EXHIBIT 274.]  The CT-Scan showed four bulging disks.  He prescribed Percocet for my back pain.  He discussed sending me to see a pain management doctor.  He did not encourage me to see a chiropractor.  I got the impression that he just didn’t like chiropractors.  He wanted to monitor the pain for a while before referring me to another doctor, a neurologist.

The radiology report from Florida Hospital Waterman revealed a broad disk bulge at L1-2, L2-3, and L3-4.  It revealed spondylolysis, anterolisthesis, and neuroforaminal narrowing.  I never had back problems prior to the accident.  IF anything was wrong in my back or neck, I was totally asymptomatic as medical records galore prove.

On August 8, 2017, the trial on the citation that I received was held in Ocoee, Florida.  The case was dismissed by Judge Elizabeth Starr.  The Trooper testified that he did not witness the accident.  He saw my car on the shoulder with damage to the left front.  He saw the 18-wheeler ahead.

The truck driver, Robert Longest, testified that he felt something, but never saw me.  He said he then saw me spinning out of control in his left rearview mirror.  He claimed there was damage to the left front of his truck.  He said my car was really low and he never saw me.  He said he called 911 and then headed back to check on me.  [The Highway Patrol did not provide a 911 call from Robert Longest.]

On cross-examination, Longest confirmed that he didn’t see me at all and didn’t know for sure what happened.  He also admitted that it was possible that he was in the third lane from the right (where I say he was).

I asked Longest if he saw the accident report that showed I was traveling Northbound on the Southbound lane.  He had no explanation for how the Trooper’s version could be accurate since he testified he never saw me.

In speaking with the judge, the Trooper claimed I told him I didn’t know what happened.  This is absolutely false.  My only uncertainty was whether I was in Lane 1 or 2.  I told him I was 90% sure I was in Lane 2.  I knew for a fact that I was in one of the two exit lanes.

Judge Starr rolled her eyes at the Trooper’s claim of the accident.  Then she seemed to make it clear that there was no one there who knew what happened.  I told her I knew exactly what happened.  She then asked if I wanted to go forward to present my case.  I said I wished I knew what she was thinking, but I moved to dismiss and if she didn’t grant the motion, I would be happy to present the evidence.  Judge Starr said there’s no evidence.  Case dismissed.

On August 10, 2017, I had an after-surgery follow-up visit with Dr. Stacia Goldey. [EXHIBIT 274.]

On August 10, 2017, I had a flu shot at Walmart. [EXHIBIT 274.]

On October 12, 2017, a Dan Newlin attorney obtained the CAD reports from three 911 calls at the time of the accident.  These 911 records revealed an additional eyewitness: Jerome Wilt, 6133 Raleigh St, Orlando, Florida 32835, 407-947-3420.  I called him.  He was traveling Southbound behind me.  He saw that I was in the second lane from the shoulder.  He saw the truck come over into my lane from the third lane (from the shoulder).  He saw the truck hit me on my left front side, and he saw me spinning.  He passed at that point and called 911.  He is a very nice man and made a point to say, “if you need a witness, I am your man.”

So, there are two eyewitnesses to what happened – Jerome Wilt and me.  The trucker has testified that he did not see me and does not know what happened.  A third witness, Carrie Broussard, has testimony that establishes that the Trooper’s story was incorrect.

On November 20, 2017, I saw Dr. Jose Lopez at Central Florida Total Health Care.  I complained that I now have limited mobility in my neck, have significant pain when I try to sleep, and really hurt when trying to get out of my car.  I took a drive to Atlanta and back to see my daughter, Brittany Harrell, and my granddaughters.  The pain/discomfort was really bad.

I had to physically turn in my seat in the car to see to my left.  Dr. Lopez said I must have an MRI, and he gave me an order for one.  I was out of the 30 Percocet that he prescribed, but he didn’t want to give me more at that time.   His diagnosis on my neck is Cervicalgia.  He prescribed Diclofenac and Tizanidine.  I am severely claustrophobic, so I hoped I could handle the MRI.  Dr. Lopez prescribed Clonazepam.  I have previously been unable to take an MRI.  I even had to cancel a CT-Scan as it was starting because of my severe claustrophobia.

On November 21, 2017, I called Clermont Radiology about the MRI.  I was informed the MRI would take 45 minutes, and my head would be immobilized.  I knew I could not do this unless they put me to sleep.  I planned to see Dr. Jose Lopez again to discuss this.  I felt he may have to begin with a CT-Scan of my neck.

Clermont Radiology

871 Oakley Seaver Drive

Clermont, Florida 34711

352-241-6100

Fax: 352-241-6101

info@clermontradiology.com

On November 21, 2017, I obtained the tapes of the three 911 calls from May 5, 2017.  214 is my call.  206 is Carrie Broussard, the woman who didn’t see anything but me spinning.  207 is eyewitness Jerome Wilt.  The tapes establish my story.  Carrie Broussard’s tapes confirm that I was spinning down the Turnpike, as does the call from Jerome Wilt.  The 911 tapes were provided by the Florida Highway Patrol:

Aerica D. Ramos

Regional Communications Center Manager

Florida Highway Patrol

Lake Worth Regional Communications Center

Florida’s Turnpike Mile Marker 94, Building 9310

Lake Worth, FL 33463

Office: (561)357-4012

Fax: (561)357-4090

AericaRamos@flhsmv.gov

www.flhsmv.gov/fhp

On November 21, 2017, I was forced to sell my 2009 Pontiac Solstice as I could no longer drive a small car because of the pain from my back.  I could no longer even walk normally; my balance was off, and it has become much worse.  I again had an Enterprise car; I had to pay for this.  I would not have had an Enterprise car if I had not been hurt on May 5, 2017.

I had a CT-Scan on December 14, 2017.  Florida Hospital Medical Center diagnosed me with Spondylosis in the cervical region, Spinal Stenosis in the cervical region, and Cervicalgia. [EXHBIT 203.]

I was unable to see Dr. Lopez for months after this because his receptionist said she could not reach Progressive to be assured they will pay.

My neck and back had gotten worse rather than better.

I obtained a referral to Dr. Alan Newman, a chiropractor.  He diagnosed me with a Ventral Hernia, but he referred me to Dr. Sumanth Padmanabh, an internist.  I subsequently saw Dr. Newman many times.  I have received massage therapy, traction for my neck, and other procedures.

Dr. Alan Newman said the CT-Scan Report shows four herniated discs in my neck.

The pain and discomfort in my abdomen has continued since the accident.  It has not lessened at all.  If I accidentally bump into something or get poked in the abdomen, it is very painful.  My abdomen pokes out like I’m pregnant.

Dr. Sumanth Padmanabh ordered a CT-Scan.  I had the CT-Scan on February 23, 2018.

Dr. Padmanabh has diagnosed me with a Ventral Hernia.  His opinion was an abdominal tear that has created a hernia where I had an incision on March 29, 2016.

My medical reports from Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center show that my abdomen was fully-repaired in 2016.  The automobile accident on May 5, 2017 caused the damage that appeared after I was hit.

I sleep on my left side, and I have back pain when I try to go to sleep.  My back seemed a little better after 12 months, but it has become progressively worse.  I still have back pain.

My neck has gotten better as I am no longer in constant pain, but the range of motion is still restricted, and I do have some neck pain.  It is v ery painful if I try to bend my neck backwards.

My abdomen continues to be as bad as it was on May 5, 2017.  I have been told that surgeons don’t want to operate on what I have until an organ becomes incarcerated.

The accident has had a significant impact on my quality of life.  Both my abdomen and my back and neck hurt me all the time.  I can’t carry anything that’s very heavy.  I can no longer drive a fun car; I had to get a car that I can easily slide in and out of without putting pressure on my back or abdomen.  I can’t walk for very far without pain forcing me to stop.  I can no longer walk without a cane.  Now I can’t walk without a walker.

I took two Tylenol every night before I got in bed.  I was later prescribed Alprazolam, which does make me sleepy.  I usually pop some Tylenol during the day as well.

On March 26, 2018, I saw Dr. Owen Fraser.  He diagnosed me with Diastasis Recti.  I had not had an MRI because I am severely claustrophobic.  He also diagnosed me with an inguinal hernia and wanted to schedule surgery.

Dr. Owen Fraser

1805 W Colonial Drive #A

Orlando, Florida

407-578-9142

I went to see urologist Dr. Jason Gerboc for a second opinion on the inguinal hernia, and he reported that he could not feel a tear.  He sent me for a CT-Scan of my abdomen because he was concerned with a cyst in my left kidney.

Dr. Jason Gerboc

1210 Waterman Way

Tavares, Florida 32778

352-343-2364

The CT-Scan reported a C7 by 65 mm cyst.  The scan also reported a sliding type hiatal hernia.

On May 30, 2018, Leesburg Chiropractic diagnosed me with Esophagitis, Cervicalgia, Cerviobrachial Syndrome, Pain in thoracic spine, and Low back pain. [EXHIBIT 204.]

I finally was able to see Dr. Jose Lopez again when Progressive said they would pay him.  He reviewed the CT-Scan of my neck, diagnosed cervicalgia, and sent me to Hohman Rehab for physical therapy.

I went to Hohman Rehab seven times.  It was extremely expensive – $400 or so for a half hour of exercises holding a ball or pulling on some rubber bands.  Hohman Rehab reports that my cervical rotation was 45-degrees to the left and 42-degrees to the right after seven sessions.  I was told that normal is 80-degrees.

Hohman Rehab

236 Mohawk Road

Clermont, Florida 34715

855-404-6908

Fax: 352-404-6909

On June 7, 2018, I had an MRI at Clermont Radiology.  The MRI showed divarication of the abdominis recti (also known as diastasis recti) and bulging of the intra-abdominal contents.  There is a 4.5-inch separation of the muscles that are supposed to keep the abdominal contents contained.  The radiologist notes that it is “medically probable that the findings were caused by the auto accident.”

Clermont Radiology

871 Oakley Sever Drive

Clermont, Florida 34711

352-241-6100

Fax: 352-241-6101

info@clermontradiology.com

From previous consultations with Dr. Parra Davila and Dr. Fraser, divarication of the abdominis recti and bulging of the intra-abdominal contents is not something they want to do surgery to repair until an organ becomes incarcerated.

The pain and discomfort in my abdomen has continued since the accident.  It has not lessened at all.  If I accidentally bump into something or get poked in the abdomen, it is very painful.  I am always in a lot of pain when I lie down or sit down and get up.

I sleep on my left side, and the back pain is very bad when I try to go to sleep.

I haven’t wanted to risk back surgery, but I have back pain whenever I move around.  The idea that my back will be like this forever is devastating.  I have slept on the sofa for six years so my back can be supported by the back cushions of the sofa.  It keeps me from moving, which is very painful.

The accident has had a huge impact on my quality of life.  Both my abdomen and my back and neck hurt me throughout every day.  I can’t carry anything that’s very heavy at all – even one grocery bag will make me hurt.  I can no longer drive a fun car.  I have to have a car that I can easily slide in and out of without putting pressure on my back or abdomen.  I can’t walk for very far without pain forcing me to stop.  The limited range of motion in my neck makes driving somewhat dangerous.  I have to physically move in my seat to reposition my body so I can see far enough to either side.  When I do this, I am unable to see part of the road that I should be seeing.  I was forced to stop dating.  I no longer have any social life.

I have driven many miles due to all of this – doctors, tests, and car buying.  I really shouldn’t drive anymore.

I have permanent injuries from the auto accident.  I have only half of the normal rotation of my neck.  I will forever have back pain.  I have a painful and unsightly abdominal injury that may require surgery at some point in the future if an organ gets incarcerated.  I may have an inguinal hernia.

My medical treatment and testing had ended until a recent fall that Humana is covering.  I should be having quarterly CT-Scans for the rest of my life as a precaution to see if any organs have become incarcerated.  But I can’t afford them.  Medicare won’t pay because it is a traffic accident insurance case.

On 2/8/2019, I fell down the stairs at the Condo. [EXHIBIT ____.]

I had two MRIs on March 20, 2019.

My back has continued to deteriorate.  I have great difficulty walking.  Stairs are a nightmare.

On March 11, 2020, I saw Dr. Roderick Claybrooks at BioSpine.  He says I need Lumbar Fusion – two rods and four bolts.  He says the lowest of my discs needs to be removed.  He wanted to do the surgery right away, but since I terminated Dan Newlin, they wouldn’t move forward until I retain another attorney.  I didn’t retain another attorney. [EXHIBIT ___.] [EXHIBIT ___.]

On 3/28/2019, I began efforts to sell my Condo by Owner. [EXHIBIT ___.]

On 6/2/2019, I fell down the stairs at my condo. [EXHIBIT ____.]

On or about 7/23/2019, the State of Florida issued a Handicapped person notification for me. [EXHIBIT ____.]

On 9/4/2019, I fell down the stairs at my condo. [EXHIBIT ____.]

I fell down the stairs at my condo at least a dozen times.  I now carry a siren in my pocket so I can alert people for help when I fall.

Dr. Alan Newman prescribed a cane and later prescribed a wheelchair.

On 5/21/2020, I received a letter from Sean Palmer at Progressive Insurance informing me I had run out of benefits. [EXHIBIT ____.]

On 6/8/2020, I fell down the stairs at the condo.

On 8/22/2020, I had emergency treatment at Advent Health in Leesburg.

On 11/17/2020, I had emergency treatment at Advent Health in Leesburg.

In 2021, I changed insurance and was unable to get an appointment with the assigned Primary Care Doctor, Dr. Pellegrino, or any required referrals.

On 10/8/2021, I fell down the stairs at my condo. [EXHIBIT ____.]

On 3/10/2022, Dr. Alan Newman prescribed a wheelchair. [EXHIBIT ____.]

On 6/22/2022, I sold my condo in Leesburg, Florida.

On 6/26/2022, I fell in a ditch in Leesburg, Florida while attempting to walk through the grass after eating dinner.  My phone went flying, and I had no way to try to get anyone’s attention.  A young family finally saw me waving and stopped to pull me up and take me down a block to my motel.

On 6/27/2022, I sold my Jeep and bought a Winnebago to be my home.

On 7/3/2022, much to my surprise, I lost my health insurance because I moved to South Dakota.

On 7/5/2022, I became a resident of South Dakota. [EXHIBIT ____.]

The State of South Dakota reviewed documentation from Dr. Alan Newman, and South Dakota declared me DISABLED. [EXHIBIT ____.]

On 7/11/2022, the transmission failed, and the Winnebago was damaged. [EXHIBIT ____.]

On 8/15/2022, I finally received payment from State Farm for the Winnebago.  It was declared totaled.

On 8/16/2022, I purchased a 2018 Thor Ace 30.4.

On 9/1/2022, I had eight teeth extracted.  My teeth are rotting due to a medication I am taking for anxiety from all this.

On 10/13/2022, I had a Glaucoma check, and my pressures were excellent.  Latanaprost and Timolol were again prescribed.

On 11/3/2022, I fell on a boulder losing my balance upon exiting my RV.  I landed on my shoulder, and it was badly bruised. [EXHIBIT ____.]

On 11/15/2022, I had an emergency session with Marina Ross of Harmony United Psychiatric Care.  I had begun again feeling that I would be better off dead.

On 11/21/2022, I broke an upper tooth.

On 11/27/2022, I fell inside the RV without my cane, which I hang by the door.  I was able to crawl to a position where I could get leverage for each of my hands, so I got upright after a few fails.

I had a bad fall on 12/2/2022.  I fell two more times trying to get up.  I screamed for help and a lady and her two sons finally heard me and came to lift me out of a mud puddle and helped me into the RV where I now live.  I was hurting all over and had a terrible headache.

I have had many falls.

On 12/26/2022, I had a very bad fall and was taken by ambulance to the Emergency Room.  I have lost the use of my left hand.

 

It started with an accident on the Florida Turnpike… or was it Attempted Murder?

On May 5, 2017, I left my home at 126 Buccaneer Drive, in Leesburg headed for Winter Park.

The Florida Turnpike Southbound from Leesburg changes from two-lanes [EXHIBIT ___] to four lanes [EXHIBIT ___] to six lanes [EXHIBIT ___].

At 2:35 pm on May 5, 2017, I was driving my white 2006 Pontiac Solstice convertible Southbound on the Florida Turnpike about half a mile from Exit 265.  I was driving about 65 miles-per-hour in the middle of my lane.  I was going to Winter Park, and I prepared to exit at 265.  I had signaled and moved to the right when my GPS told me the exit was coming up. [The police report says the accident was reported at 2:36 pm.]

I was in the second lane from the shoulder, one of the two marked exit lanes.  The Highway Patrol numbers lanes starting at the median, so I was in their Lane 5.  I was going to go to the left after exiting, so I positioned myself in the second lane.

I heard a loud bang and felt the impact as an 18-wheeler rammed into the left side of my car.  The car began spinning out of control.  Four 360-degree spins were confirmed by an eyewitness, Carrie Broussard.  I believe I spun as many as 8 times.  I tried to keep the car from hitting the big cement barricades in the median.  I was afraid I was going to flip at one point – felt like my two left wheels left the ground.  By steering into the skid, I was able to regain control of the car.  I believe the engine had quit working because I coasted across perhaps one lane of traffic.

There were cars stopped behind me.  No one got out to help me, and I didn’t think to flag anyone down as a witness.  I went 69 years without ever being in a wreck, so I was unprepared and apparently in shock.  [EXHIBIT ___.]

I saw the truck pull over about a quarter of a mile ahead of me, well before Exit 265.  I thought he might not stop.  I don’t believe there was any reason for him to drive that far unless he just wanted to make it unlikely that I would inspect his vehicle.

On 5/5/2017, Robert Longest, the truck driver, told Trooper Linzmayer that he was in the right lane closest to the shoulder.  I heard him say this as he stood outside my wrecked car.  The story has changed many times.

On 5/8/2017, Robert Longest made an Accident Report to his employer, Boise Cascade, that shows he was in the right lane closest to the shoulder and I was just to his left. [EXHIBIT ___.]  His Report falsely identifies where he was on the Turnpike.   His fraudulent drawing shows that my car’s right front impacted with his truck’s left front as both vehicles drove in the same direction.  His drawing falsely shows both of us exiting the Turnpike.  Neither of us exited.  His report says: “Couldn’t see the vehicle.”  His Report falsely indicates my vehicle was not towed from the scene.  His Report claims that he never saw me in his rearview mirrors; that story later changed.  He reported that once he pulled over, he saw my white car 1/4 to ½ mile behind him.  His Report claims he checked on me and then called Chris Johnson, but this is not what the phone records show.  His Accident Report says:

“I was driving Southbound on Turnpike just before merging on 408 and I heard a boom (I thought was a blowout.)  I looked in the mirrors and see nothing so I put my turn signal on to pull over and I did see a white car about ¼ to ½ mile behind me.  I got out and checked on the driver and called Chris Johnson.” [EXHIBIT ___.]

The Report says the accident took place on a curve, but that is false.  It was straight. [EXHIBIT ____.]  The Report says Longest was driving 60, but Trooper Linzmayer and I say he was driving 70.  The Report was signed by Robert Longest and Wayne Laster.  Wayne Laster wasn’t there, so I don’t know how he could sign this false report.

 

On August 8, 2017, a trial was held on the citation that I received from Trooper Linzmayer.  It was held in Ocoee, Florida.  The case was dismissed by Orange County Judge Elizabeth Starr.  Trooper Linzmayer testified that he did not witness the accident.  He saw my car on the shoulder with damage to the left front.  He saw the 18-wheeler ahead.

The truck driver, Robert Longest, testified on 8/8/2017 that he felt something, but never saw me.  He said he then saw me spinning out of control in his left rearview mirror.  He claimed there was damage to the left front of his truck.  He said my car was really low and he never saw me.  He said he called 911 and then headed back to check on me.

Robert Longest apparently lied about calling 911.  The Highway Patrol has no record of a call from Robert Longest.  And Robert Longest lied when he claimed he saw me spinning out of control in his rearview mirror.  That is not what he told his employer on 5/8/2017 or stated in his deposition on 2/5/2019.

Liars have trouble keeping their stories straight.  WebMD says:

“When someone isn’t telling the truth, it’s harder to keep the details of their story straight. Someone who lies frequently will eventually lose track of previous lies and start to contradict themselves.”

On cross-examination, Longest confirmed that he didn’t see me at all and didn’t know for sure what happened.  He also admitted that it was possible that he was in the third lane from the right (where I say he was).

I asked Longest if he saw the accident report that showed I was traveling Northbound on the Southbound lane.  He had no explanation for how the Trooper’s version could be accurate since he testified he never saw me.

Robert Longest gave a sworn deposition on 2/5/2019.  I will now cite from his deposition so he can tell you what he claimed happened on 5/5/2017.

Page 19:

10 A. I was coming up — I was going to merge onto

11 the 408 and go east. I was not there yet, but I was in

12 the two lanes — there’s like six lanes across there.

13 And the two lanes to the right merge onto the 408. And

14 I was in the second lane getting ready to merge onto the

15 408 when — do you want me to explain what exactly

16 happened —

17 Q. Yeah.

18 A. — from that point —

19 Q. Yes.

20 A. — until I stopped?

21 Q. Yep.

22 A. Okay. I felt like a jolt on the truck and then

23 I felt a vibration, you know, in the whole cab of the

24 truck. And my first thought was I’m — it felt like a

25 tire coming apart, like maybe my front steer tire was –

 

Page 20:

1 that’s what I’m thinking, you know, my tire’s coming

2 apart, I’m going to have a blowout, is what it felt

3 like.

4 So then I felt the wheel a little bit, of

5 shaking the wheel. And as all this was happening, I’m

6 looking in the passenger mirror and I turned my turn

7 signal on to get off of the highway into the emergency

8 lane because, like I said, I think I’m having a blowout,

9 so I’m pulling over.

10 So as I pull over, now, I don’t see any cars

11 anywhere. I pull onto the emergency lane and I’m almost

12 stopped and I look in the driver’s mirror and there’s a

13 car quite a ways back behind me and he’s like spun out

14 in the highway back there, stopped. So I was

15 wondering what — you know, I thought to myself, I

16 wonder what that guy’s doing.

17 So I get out. I look at my tire and there’s

18 actually damage on it. It’s leaking oil where the cap

19 in the center of the rim was broken out and there’s

20 white paint on the lug nuts where something had hit

21 there.

22 And at that point, I’m thinking the guy back

23 there or the car back there must have hit there and

24 that’s what I felt. So at that time, I dialed 911 and I

25 started jogging back to that car.

 

Page 21:

1 Q. What tire was it that you saw damage to?

2 A. The driver’s side front.

3 Q. Any other part of the truck that had visible

4 damage that you saw?

5 A. There was. The bumper on the passenger side

6 was bent out. It wasn’t actually bent out, but it was

7 curled out. And I couldn’t figure out what did that

8 because I didn’t hit anything on — you know, when I

9 pulled over. There was nothing hit there.

10 So I was wondering — and I just glimpsed — I

11 got a glimpse of that right at the end. After all the

12 police and everything, I had just glanced at that.

13 Now, my boss had showed up at the scene and

14 Mr. Windsor — now, I walked — I went back to him, to

15 his car. By that time, he had pulled into the emergency

16 lane. He was on the phone. His windows were still up.

17 I motioned for him to put his window down. I asked him

18 if he was all right. He said yes. He asked me if I was

19 all right. I said yes.

20 I said what happened? Where did you come from?

21 And he says I have no idea. He says I never saw you.

22 And I said really?

23 And about that time, this officer — I think he

24 just happened to be driving by because he was there

25 right away. He came up, asked us if we were all right

 

Page 22:

1 Yes. Asked what happened. I said I have no idea what

2 happened. I said I never saw this car.

3 And he asked him what happened. He says I have

4 no idea what happened. He said I never saw that truck.

5 So he goes are you telling me you guys were

6 involved in an accident and neither one of you-all know

7 what happened? And I said it really sounds stupid, but

8 no, I don’t know what happened. And he didn’t either.

9 So he told me to go back to my vehicle, which I

10 did, and then he did his investigation and whatever he

11 did. And then he came back up. And I couldn’t drive my

12 truck because of the leaking oil out of the front and so

13 they had to tow that.

14 And then the officer told me he was giving him

15 a citation and I don’t remember what that was, but he

16 was getting a ticket, and I guess, you know, told us

17 pretty much we could go.

18 Q. What — you said your boss showed up. What’s

19 his name?

20 A. Chris Mello.

21 Q. How do you spell the last name?

22 A. M-e-l-l-o.

23 Q. How long did it take for your boss to arrive on

24 the scene?

25 A. I wasn’t far from my work. He was — I don’t

 

Page 23:

1 know — maybe 15 minutes.

2 Q. You had called him right after the incident?

3 A. I believe I did.

4 Q. Did he speak with —

5 A. I don’t think I called him. I called the

6 dispatch boss, which is kind of my boss. I believe I

7 told him what had happened, I’ve been involved in an

8 accident, and I believe maybe he may have told him.

9 Q. Who is the dispatch boss?

10 A. Chris Johnson.

11 Q. So you phoned Mr. Johnson and he most likely

12 told Mr. Mello?

13 A. I believe that’s how it went.

14 Q. Do you remember what you said to them or to

15 Mr. Johnson?

16 A. I believe I just said I was involved in an

17 accident and told him where I was. And he said okay, do

18 what you’ve got to do, you know, blah, blah, blah, and

19 just letting him know what was going on.

20 Q. Did they say — did any of them say that they

21 were going to come to the scene of the accident?

22 A. No. No. I didn’t know anybody was coming.

 

Page 25:

11 Q. How long were you at the scene for?

12 A. Maybe 35, 45 minutes.

13 Q. Did anybody else show up or arrive on the scene

14 while you were there?

15 A. No — well, maybe the paramedics and maybe an

16 ambulance because I had told the dispatch lady at the

17 911. She said is there anyone injured? And I said —

18 at that point, I had not been back there. I said I

19 don’t know. I said but I would think — it’s a small

20 car and I’m in an 18-wheeler, so, you know, I don’t

21 know. It’s possible. So I think she said she was just

22 sending everybody.

 

Page 28:

6 Q. Sure.

7 At any point did you notice the white vehicle

8 prior to the impact or what you thought was a tire

9 blowout?

10 A. I did not. I did not.

11 Q. Do you know what the speed was on the turnpike

12 in the area that the incident happened?

13 A. I’m assuming 60 — probably 70. Most of the

14 turnpike is 70.

15 Q. Can you estimate what speed you had been going

16 prior to impact?

17 A. I’m guessing between 50 and 60. Like I said, I

18 wasn’t up to the ramp yet. The ramp is 45, but I

19 wasn’t — we weren’t that far up. We were back still on

20 the turnpike when all that happened. So yeah, it was —

21 it was probably 70 there.

 

Page 31:

7 Q. Were there any dangerous conditions in that

8 area, like construction or anything that —

9 A. No.

10 Q. — you might deem hazardous?

11 Do you know what lane William Windsor was in

12 prior to the impact?

13 A. I don’t. I have a lot of assumptions from what

14 the damage — you know, I have a good idea what

15 happened, but that would be — you know, like I said, I

16 didn’t see him, so I just — from the damage and the way

17 everything happened, I’m pretty sure I know what

18 happened, but that was — that would be an assumption.

19 Q. How do you think the accident occurred?

20 A. I think — I think he was — the way my bumper

21 was bent out, there was forward — I think he was — I

22 think he wanted to stay on the turnpike. That would be

23 the only reason he would be changing lanes there. And

24 he was in the two lanes that go onto the 408, so I think

25 he was just going to go up and cut in front of me and go

 

Page 32:

1 over and stay on the turnpike is what I’m just — that’s

2 just what I’m thinking.

3 But he didn’t — he misjudged it. He clipped

4 my bumper, which would bend my bumper exactly the way it

5 was bent, then wrapped around the front of my truck.

6 The vibration I felt I think was me pushing him. And

7 I’m up so high and he’s down so low in the little sports

8 car, I didn’t see him right down in front because of the

9 hood, and I think he wrapped on around to the driver’s

10 side.

11 When I was looking in the mirror to pull over,

12 I think he wrapped around this way and my lug nuts and

13 that tire the — hit his car and did all that — because

14 there’s damage on his driver’s side, which, you know, I

15 mean, there’s damage on my driver’s side and damage on

16 his driver’s side. So it would be like we would have to

17 be going opposite directions to get damage on both of

18 those sides. And then he went spinning off over where

19 he ended up as I pulled over.

20 That’s really the only way I can see that —

21 all that taking place and happening, with that damage on

22 the truck, you know, because there’s nothing that hit

23 the bumper on that side. There was nothing that could

24 have hit that. There was nothing there. When I pulled

25 over, there was — you know, I just pulled over. So he

 

Page 33:

1 had to clip — something had to clip that bumper.

2 Q. Have you seen the police report in this

3 accident?

4 A. I think I did.

5 Q. Do you agree with its contents?

6 MR. HYLAND: Objection to form. You can go

7 ahead and answer. I’m just objecting for the

8 record.

9 THE WITNESS: Yeah. I don’t — I think that

10 was a — was that a police report, Bill?

11 MR. HYLAND: I can’t answer for you, just on

12 your own.

13 BY MS. LASO:

14 Q. Just so you know, I cannot know — I don’t want

15 to know about anything you might have spoken with your

16 attorney or law firm or anything —

17 A. Okay. I think I did see it.

18 Q. Okay.

19 A. And it — I believe — see, at that time,

20 nobody — you know, nobody knew what happened, so I

21 don’t know. I think the report had him hitting my — on

22 this side that was hit, but I don’t think anybody knows

23 how he hit or, like I said, I don’t know how he got

24 damage on his driver’s side if he hit on — he would

25 have had to hit me on the passenger side. Do you

 

Page 34:

1 understand what I’m saying?

2 If he had just run into that tire, it would

3 have just hit — you know, if he was just passing me or

4 something and just hit me, there wouldn’t be any damage

5 over on this side of his car.

6 So I don’t know. I don’t know. I mean, I

7 don’t know if he — they thought he might have spun out

8 and hit me there. I don’t have a clue how they

9 determined anything they determined.

10 Q. And just remind me. I might have already asked

11 you. There were two lanes to get onto the 408. Were

12 you on the furthest right or the —

13 A. The second.

14 Q. I guess closest to the turnpike?

15 A. Well, yes. Yes. I was in — not the right.

16 Q. The left —

17 A. Yes.

18 Q. — merge lane?

19 A. Yes.

 

23 Q. I wanted to ask you about the — you mentioned

24 the hood of the truck. When you’re driving, typically

25 can you see — is it difficult to see what’s in front –

 

Page 35:

1 A. Yes.

2 Q. — of you?

3 A. Right down — right down in front of the truck,

4 yes, it’s difficult. Now, you have mirrors out there,

5 but they kind of show down the sides of the truck. And

6 depending — you know, like I said, I’m probably ten

7 feet in the air up.

8 And, you know, the seat, depending on where

9 your seat is on the height — now, if you’re all the way

10 up against the roof, which, you know, nobody — you

11 don’t drive that way, you could probably look way down

12 there and see it.

13 But when you’re driving, just driving normally

14 on an air ride seat, it’s kind of like in the middle,

15 you know, where you’re comfortable and your vision, you

16 can see down the road. But it’s difficult to see down

17 right in front of the truck. And the hood — the hood

18 sticks out, so you have that obstacle as well.

19 Q. So it’s hard to see right in front of the

20 truck?

21 A. Yes.

22 Q. Do you know how many feet might be obscured or

23 difficult to see?

24 A. I don’t.

25 Q. Can you see to the left or the right of the

 

Page 36:

truck?

2 A. I mean, yeah, you can see, but there’s a little

3 zone there that — usually there’s no vehicles in that

4 zone because it’s right up against the truck. I mean,

5 you would — there would never be anybody — you would

6 never be that close to anybody in that zone.

7 Q. If there was a vehicle to the left of your

8 truck, let’s say the left lane, you’re in the right

9 lane, would you be able to see that vehicle?

10 A. Yes. Yeah, there’s a mirror — there’s mirrors

11 for that. There’s also mirror on a door over here that

12 shines down. Like, the window on that particular truck

13 goes down where you can actually see — like a lot of

14 trucks, it will be straight on that door and there’s

15 like a blind spot there.

16 Well, that truck has the — it’s cut out. I

17 guess they probably cut it out for that reason because

18 there was a blind spot there, so it’s cut out there to

19 where you can see over there. And —

20 MR. HYLAND: Are you talking about on the

21 driver’s side?

22 THE WITNESS: On the passenger — well, both

23 sides. Both sides are — the doors are actually cut

24 out.

25 BY MS. LASO:

 

Page 37:

1 Q. Cut out?

2 A. You know, where you — like an armrest.

3 They’re cut down there. And I don’t know if that was

4 the reason they did that, to give you more view over

5 there or not, but it was a good idea, the design that

6 they came up with with that. But, yes, you can see on

7 the sides. You know, if you’re looking there, you can

8 see.

 

On 11/15/2018, Boise Cascade Johnson and Laster:

  1. What is the name and address of the person answering these interrogatories, and, if applicable, the person’s official position or relationship with the party to whom the interrogatories are directed, your affiliation with the Defendant, and the length of time you have been employed by the Defendant, and list all the positions you held in the past and your current position.

ANSWER: Legal counsel to Boise with assistance from Chris Johnson and Wayne Laster, Boise employees who can be reached through counsel.

  1. Describe in detail how the incident described in the Complaint happened, including all actions taken by the Defendant driver to prevent the incident.

ANSWER: Boise objects to Interrogatory No. 3 as over broad.

  1. Describe in detail each act or omission on the part of any party to this lawsuit that you contend constituted negligence that was a contributing legal cause of the incident in question.

ANSWER: Boise objects to Interrogatory No. 4 as vague, overly broad, unduly burdensome, and to the extent it requests information protected from disclosure by the attorney-client privilege and/or attorney work product doctrine. Subject to and without waiving the foregoing objection, Boise states that Plaintiff contributed to the incident alleged in Plaintiff’s Complaint by failing to observe traffic rules and/or failing to take all reasonable steps to avoid the incident.

  1. Do you contend any person or entity other than you is, or may be, liable in whole or part for the claims asserted against you in this lawsuit? If so, state the full name and address of each such person or entity, the legal basis for your contention, the facts or evidence upon which your contention is based, and whether or not you have notified each such person or entity of your contention.

ANSWER: Boise objects to interrogatory No. 6 as vague, overly broad, unduly burdensome, and to the extent it requests information protected from disclosure by the attorney client work privilege and/or attorney work product doctrine. Subject to and without waiving the foregoing objection, Boise states that the Plaintiff is liable in whole or in part for the claims asserted against Boise in this lawsuit.

  1. List the names, titles and addresses of all persons who have provided information, aid or assistance in answering any issues addressed in these interrogatory questions and give a brief summary of the information or assistance rendered by that person(s).

ANSWER: See response to Interrogatory No. 1.

On 11/16/2018,

  1. Describe in detail each act or omission on the part of any party to this lawsuit that you contend constituted negligence that was a contributing legal cause of the incident in question.

ANSWER: Defendant Longest objects to Interrogatory No. 6 as vague, overly broad, unduly burdensome, and to the extent it requests information protected from disclosure by the attorney-client privilege and/or attorney work product doctrine. Subject to and without waiving the foregoing objection, Defendant Longest states that Plaintiff contributed to the incident alleged in Plaintiff’s Complaint by failing to observe traffic rules and/or failing to take all reasonable steps to avoid the incident.

  1. Do you contend any person or entity other than you is, or may be, liable in whole or part for the claims asserted against you in this lawsuit? If so, state the full name and address of each such person or entity, the legal basis for your contention, the facts or evidence upon which your contention is based, and whether or not you have notified each such person or entity of your contention.

ANSWER: Defendant Longest objects to interrogatory No. 8 as vague, overly broad, unduly burdensome, and to the extent it requests information protected from disclosure by the attorney client work privilege and/or attorney work product doctrine. Subject to and without waiving the foregoing objection, Defendant Longest states that the Plaintiff is liable in whole or in part for the claims asserted against him in this lawsuit. Defendant Longest reserves the right to supplement this response to the extent additional information is identified.

On 5/5/2017, Trooper Linzmayer authored a Traffic Crash Report and reported:

“V01 traveled southbound on State Road 91 (Florida Turnpike), in the #5 lane.  V02 traveled southbound on the Florida Turnpike, in the outside (#6) lane.  For an unknown reason(s) V01 skidded, and rotated clockwise, before its left front portion struck V02’s front left (steering) wheel/tire, and front left corner bumper.  D01 subsequently brought V01 to a stop on the western paved shoulder, facing south.  D02 brought V02 to a stop on the western paved shoulder, facing south, southerly from V01.”

This is a fairy tale as I will demonstrate in the courtroom.

On 5/5/2017 at 2:36 p.m., Carrie Broussard called 911. [EXHIBIT 183.]  She didn’t see the impact, but she saw me spin around several times in the middle of the Turnpike headed Southbound.  She said she saw me attempting to get out in the slow lane around Mile Marker 257, but she saw me spinning out in the two middle lanes.  She later told me I was spinning counterclockwise. [EXHIBIT ____.]  (Trooper Linzmayer said I was spinning clockwise, which would have been consistent with his bizarre account of the accident.)

On 5/5/2017 at 2:39 p.m., Jerome Wilt called 911. [EXHIBIT 184.]  He reported the accident on the Florida Turnpike between 267 and 268 between a white convertible and a semi-truck.  He said he saw the semi-truck had pulled over to the right shoulder, but the convertible was still in the middle of the road.

Jerome Wilt has said in a sworn statement that the trucker caused the accident. [EXHIBIT ___.]

On 5/5/2017 at 2:39 p.m., 17 milliseconds later, I called 911. [EXHIBIT 185.]  I told the 911 operator that I just had a truck run into me and spun me around near Exit 265 heading Southbound on the Florida Turnpike.  I told the operator that I felt a twinge in my back, but I didn’t think I was injured.  (I was clueless.  I was injured.)  I declined an ambulance.  (Dumb move on my part.)  I told the operator I was able to push the car over to the shoulder.  57-seconds into the 911 call, I told the operator that the truck driver was walking up.  I described the truck as an 18-wheeler with a green rear bumper, and I identified my car as a white Pontiac Solstice.  At 1:14 into the 911 call, I responded to the trucker that I was okay when he asked.  At 1:28 into the call, a highway patrol car appeared.  I told the operator I was driving down the road and the next thing I knew, I was hit.  The call lasted 2:11.  The Call History Record [EXHIBIT 118] shows Trooper Linzmayer was on the scene at 2:41 p.m. and was on the call until 5:41 p.m.

At 5:41 p.m. Sallis Towing towed my car to Progressive Insurance’s office and gave me a ride. [EXHIBIT 297.]

Tracy Longest’s AT&T Telephone Bill [EXHIBIT 119] shows that Robert Longest was on the phone with 407-850-7831 at the time of the accident and called 911 four minutes later.  He may have been distracted by the phone call he was on when he ran into me.  407-850-7831 is a number at ______________.

I believe Robert Longest called his company and probably got instructions on what to say and do.  Before he walked down to my vehicle, he called 407-850-7831 again and the call was connected for four minutes.  This means that person heard everything Longest and I discussed and perhaps what he told Trooper Linzmayer.  He called 407-850-7831 again at 2:49 p.m.  He called 407-455-3280 at 2:54 p.m.  He called 407-850-7831 again at 3:00 p.m.  He called 407-558-1961 at 3:02 p.m.  He received an incoming call from 407-293-4463 at 3:17 p.m.  He called 407-455-3280 again at 3:53 p.m.  He received an incoming call from 407-455-3280 at 4:15 p.m.  He called 407-455-3280 again at 4:23 p.m.  He received an incoming call from 407-455-3280 at 4:24 p.m.  He called 407-455-3280 again at 5:05 p.m. and spoke for 16 minutes.  He called 407-271-9810 at 5:21 p.m. and spoke for 27 minutes.  At 5:48 p.m., he received an incoming call from 407-271-9810.  He called 321-947-7392 at 5:57 p.m. and spoke for 11 minutes.

6:31 321-987-9397  strange

6:34 407-421-2155  landscaping

6:35 407-468-5455  sms

6:37 407-421-2155  landscaping

6:38 321-987-9397  strange

8:48 407-670-4362  retired, wouldn’t talk, did talk to longest

8:55 407-421-2155  landscaping

8:56 440-453-3331  not accepting calls at this time recording

9:01 407-455-3280  left vm

When the trucker (Robert Longest) spoke through my passenger window, he asked if I was okay and said he was sorry.  He did not admit liability.  He did say he didn’t know what happened.

I called my insurance company to report the accident.  Progressive Insurance Claim Number 171822789.  Progressive Insurance Adjuster: Steven Larue – 407-949-3697.  (Michael F. Sopko of Progressive has handled medical claims – 800-444-3909.)  Police Report Number 85433907.  The 18-wheeler Kenworth truck was owned by a Goliath, Boise Cascade.

The State Trooper, Gregory S. Linzmayer, arrived, spoke briefly with me and Mr. Robert Longest.  He then went down the highway to the Boise Cascade Kenworth truck with Robert Longest, where he spent a long time.  I believe Chris Mello was also there.

Trooper Linzmayer only returned to me and my car briefly, did a quick look at the damage to the Pontiac Solstice from the left front, and then went back to the Kenworth truck.

Approximately two hours after the accident, the Trooper came back and gave me a fancy typed Citation.  He claimed I spun out and hit the truck on its left fender with the left front fender of my car.  This is beyond ludicrous.  Mr. Robert Longest lied and claimed he was in the far-right lane.  I heard him.  He was not in the far-right lane; he was to my left, and he hit me with his right front tire and big steel bumper.  The tire marks are very clear on my left front bumper.  They show the tire residue streaking from North to South, pooling at the Southern spot.  If I had been going down the Turnpike backwards, that tire residue would have been in the opposite direction.  My left rear wheel was badly damaged.  If I hit the truck with my left front fender against his left front fender, my left rear wheel could not get so badly damaged.

All of the damage to my car was on the left side.  The greatest damage was to the left front, but there were also holes in the driver’s door as well as dents in the left rear quarter panel.  I don’t know if the truck hit me more than once.  When I started spinning, it was all I could do to try to get the car under control.  I was afraid I was going to die when I hit the big cement barricades in the median.

I took several photos of my car, and I walked up to the truck and took a few.  The right front bumper on the truck was badly bent.  I was afraid to get out into the road to take photos of the left front of the truck.  I also didn’t think it could be relevant, but Mr. Chris Mello, the man who came to be with the trucker, said there was damage to the left front of the truck.  Trooper Linzmayer later claimed that was where I ran into the truck!  I believe Mr. Chris Mello concocted the story about the left front fender of the truck.  I suspect the paid off Trooper Linzmayer as there is no other logical explanation.

Paramedics came twice.  I told them I felt okay, just a little sore.  I felt a twinge in my back, and I told the 911 operator this as you will hear on the recording.  But I later realized that I was hurt, and I am still hurt today.

My car was small – very low to the ground, but it was far from invisible – 71.3” wide and 157.2” long.  I believe the trucker simply didn’t look, went to change lanes, and rammed me.  He told me he was exiting at 265, the exit where I was to get off.  He lied to the police to avoid a ticket and the four points.  Perhaps his job was also at risk.  He called someone who came out and was with him – someone from his company — to coach him – Chris Mello.

 

a careless driving charge is 4 points on a driver’s license. This will cause a driver’s insurance costs to rise and their license may be in jeopardy of a suspension depending on the number of points they have already received on their license.

 

When Trooper G.S. Linzmayer handed me a citation, I just about croaked.  I hadn’t had a traffic or parking ticket in 17 years, now 22 years.  I was rammed.  I did nothing wrong.  I argued politely with the Trooper, and he claimed he has seen cases before where a car spun out in the middle of the highway and hit a car left front to left front.  I think this would be all but impossible, and it certainly didn’t happen in this case.  I told Trooper Linzmayer that he needed to find the woman who called 911.  He returned later to say he had called her (Carrie Broussard) and was waiting for a callback.  He said he would tear up the citation if she corroborated my story.  I subsequently learned that she didn’t see the impact.  Trooper Linzmayer also gave me the Accident Report.

Trooper Linzmayer concealed that there was another eyewitness, Jerome Wilt.  He saw it all and has testified that the truck driver caused the accident.  Now why would Trooper Linzmayer conceal this vital information unless he was paid off?

I was told that Trooper Linzmayer would call a tow truck, but he never did.  I finally arranged a towing company through AAA: Sallis Towing – 352-874-0545.  They picked up the car and me and took us to Progressive Insurance’s office.  I paid for the tow, and Progressive reimbursed me.

As I got up out of my chair at Progressive Insurance’s office when my Enterprise car was ready, I realized I was injured.

On the way home in Leesburg on May 5, 2017, I went to LRUC Urgent Care in Mount Dora.  Dr. Jeremy Johnson examined me and took some X-rays.  He could see and feel the trauma to my abdomen.  He said it would be several weeks to a month after the swelling went down before referring me to a surgeon.  I believed the accident caused my abdomen to pull away from mesh inserted when I had Emergency Incarcerated Umbilical Hernia Surgery on March 29, 2016.  I also had some pain in my left arm, but no other pain at that time except a headache and a little neck stiffness.

 

LRUC Urgent Care in Mount Dora

8404 US Hwy 441

Mount Dora, Florida

352-385-4405

On May 8, 2017, Robert Longest submitted an Accident Report to Boise Cascade. [EXHIBIT 135.]  It was co-signed by Ivan Wayne Laster, shown as his “Supervisor.”  It shows the Boise Cascade truck in the far-right lane of a two-lane road.  It shows my Pontiac Solstice in the lane to the left of the truck.  I was never to the left of the truck.  The Florida Turnpike was six lanes in each direction where the accident took place.  It shows the road curving to the right exiting from the Turnpike, but we were a half-mile from that exit when the accident happened.  Longest claims he was driving 60-miles-per-hour, but it was at least 70.  The Report claims Robert Longest had been working 10 hours when the accident took place.  He claimed there was damage to the bumper, rim, and hub and that the truck was towed from the scene.  The report shows the truck to be a 2018 Kenworth, Company Vehicle # 87698, VIN: 1XKZD49X1551815.

Progressive Insurance informed me my car was totaled.  I had to rent an Enterprise car while I looked for a replacement for my car.  On May 10, 2017, I accepted Progressive’s offer on my car.  It was a fair amount in terms of fair market value, but I was unable to replace the car for that amount.  I was paid $7,397.10.  There was a $500 deductible that I had to absorb.  Progressive paid Enterprise directly for most, if not all, of the rentals.

 

Was this an accident?

Some people believe this was not an accident.  Some believe this was another attempt to murder me.

All of the lies don’t make sense.

Such an outlandish Accident Report doesn’t make sense.

The lies of Florida Highway Patrol Trooper Gregory Scott Linzmayer don’t make sense.

The lies and outrageous actions by the defense attorneys don’t make sense.

The lies of semi-eyewitness Carrie Broussard don’t make sense.

The communications between Carrie Broussard and Sean Boushie, the derelict who attempted to murder me several years ago, don’t make sense,

Keeping the existence of two witnesses a secret for 5 years doesn’t make sense.

The fact that the truck driver and trooper were both previously charged with domestic violence makes you wonder if they had a relationship.

Two companies worth $50 billion participating in such crimes makes no sense.

William Windsor’s Background

I, William M. Windsor, was born in Columbus, Georgia on 10/02/1948. I had the best parents in the world and a wonderful childhood,

I began my career as a junior at Texas Tech University.  I became involved in the T-shirt business in college, and after several years as a retailer, wholesaler, and manufacturer, I launched the trade magazine and trade show for the industry.  I am considered by many to be the father of the multi-billion dollar “imprinted sportswear industry.”  I started other magazines and shows, and sold the company and “retired” at a young age.

My retirement didn’t last long.  I have owned and/or operated many magazines and trade shows, travel businesses, retail stores, manufacturing companies, printing company, typesetting business, advertising agency, marketing companies, convention services businesses, souvenir and gift businesses, tourist attractions, resort businesses,  music businesses, computer software company, a consulting company, a food franchise, internet businesses, and more.  I have written numerous articles, books, training programs, and manuals.  I have spoken at conferences and trade shows across North America and in Europe, Australia, and China.

From 1992 to 1996, I was President of Advanstar Expositions, a company owned at the time by Goldman Sachs.  Advanstar was one of the largest producers of trade shows and conferences in the world.  From 1996 to 2001, I was CEO of 1st Communications, a company owned by Bain Capital, Triumph Capital Group, and me.  1st Communications made a series of multi-million dollar acquisitions to build one of the largest trade show businesses — the largest in terms of the number of annual events.  1st Communications also developed one of the first online job and resume businesses using a network of over 1,000 websites.  That business was sold to The Washington Post in 2001, and I “retired” to Atlanta, Georgia.

I discovered corruption in the federal courts in Atlanta, Georgia, and I will not stop until these judges are exposed for the world to see.  People will tell you that I’m as tenacious as they come.  I will spend the rest of my life on this if necessary.

I’m not an attorney.  I was accepted to law school but decided to go into business instead.  Since 2006, I’ve gotten quite a legal education.  At this point, I’m confident that I can do a better job than any attorney would, and I work cheap.

I come from a media family.  My father was one of the pioneers of the television industry.  He was the President of the ABC Television station in Orlando for the last 15 years of his career.  My brother was a TV news anchorman and trainer of news, weather, and sportscasters.  I was a radio and TV announcer in high school and college.

I started several companies in college.  I was accepted to law school.  Thank Heavens I went into business instead.

I was a magazine publishing company owner / publisher for 30 years.  I’ve been the publisher, President, or Vice-President of over 100 magazines.  I have also been a trade show / conference producer for 30 years.  I’ve been a speaker at conferences all around the world.  I’ve lectured at major universities.  I’m the author of hundreds of magazine articles, books, manuals, conference programs.

I’m an expert in SWOT Analysis — Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats.  I’ve written hundreds of business plans for small start-ups to multi-billion dollar businesses.  I’ve built internet sites that generate over 1,600,000 users per month.

From 2008 to 2010, I led a successful effort to clean up corruption in Ontario Canada. Current

  • Chief Activist at Lawless America 
  • CEO at The Windsor Companies 

 Past

  • CEO at 1st Communications
  • CEO at Professional Trade Shows
  • President at Advanstar Expositions
  • President at The Windsor Companies

Education

  • Texas Tech University
  • University of Kentucky
  • The University of Texas at Austin

Linked In Public Profile 

http://www.linkedin.com/in/williammichaelwindsor

Summary

Serial entrepreneur. I’ve started over 50 companies since I was a junior at Texas Tech University.  It’s what I do.   I guess my goal is to just keep doing it.  I don’t believe I will ever truly “retire.”

Specialties

Breathing life into new ideas, generating ideas, marketing, management, training, sales training, building management teams, acquisitions, divestitures.


Experience

Chief Activist

Lawless America

August 2005 – Present – Sioux Falls, South Dakota

LawlessAmerica.com began as the story of William M. Windsor’s personal experience with judicial corruption and government corruption.  Due to publicity about his efforts with the United States Supreme Court, thousands of people began telling Bill their stories, and this site morphed into a site dedicated to exposing dishonesty and corruption in government while presenting ways to battle this epidemic. 

CEO

The Windsor Companies

April 2001 – 2012

After I “retired” for the second time in 2001, I dedicated time to raising money for a project at Texas Tech University; founded a donut franchise; traveled to all 50 states by car writing a book and taking photographs; operated a music business; and started several travel businesses. 

CEO

1st Communications

July 1996 – March 2001

From 1996 to 2001, I was CEO of 1st Communications, a company owned by Bain Capital, Triumph Capital Group, and me.  1st Communications made a series of acquisitions to build one of the largest trade show businesses — the largest in terms of the number of annual events.  1st Communications also developed one of the first online job and resume businesses using a network of over 1,000 websites.  That business was sold to The Washington Post in 2001, and I “retired” to Atlanta, Georgia to be near grandchildren-to-be.

CEO

Professional Trade Shows

1996 – 2001

President

Advanstar Expositions

Privately Held; 501-1000 employees; Publishing industry

July 1992 – July 1996

From 1992 to 1996, I was President of Advanstar Expositions, a company owned at the time by Goldman Sachs. Advanstar was one of the largest producers of trade shows and conferences in the world.

President

The Windsor Companies

College – August 1992 

I began my career as a junior at Texas Tech University.  I’ve started over 50 companies in my business career.  I became involved in the T-shirt business in college, and after several years as a retailer, wholesaler, and manufacturer, I launched the trade magazine and trade show for the industry.  I started other magazines and shows, sold the company and “retired” at a young age.  I have owned and/or operated many magazines and trade shows, travel businesses, retail stores, manufacturing companies, printing company, typesetting business, advertising agency, marketing companies, convention services businesses, souvenir and gift businesses, tourist attractions, resort businesses, music businesses, computer software company, a consulting company, a food franchise, internet businesses, and more.  I’ve written numerous articles, books, training programs, and manuals.  I’ve spoken at conferences and trade shows across North America and in Europe, Australia, and China.


Education 

Texas Tech University

BBA, Marketing

I worked full-time during college.  My first two years I worked as an announcer at radio and television stations.  I had a television talk show in the summer before my senior year on the ABC station in Orlando, Florida.  The last two years were spent owning and operating a T-shirt and gift business, a bail bond service for students, and a retail store selling a variety of student-oriented products.  I was also the Texas representative for College Marketing Research – responsible for obtaining over 10,000 credit card applications for Humble Oil, conducting campus surveys for magazines, and more.  I was accepted to law school but decided I enjoyed making money too much to spend two years studying night and day.

Activities and Societies: Student Senator (2 years), Delta Tau Delta Fraternity (President), Interfraternity Council (Vice-President), Alpha Epsilon Rho, Intramural Athletics, Speech and Debate Team, Faculty-Student Discipline Committee, Who’s Who in American Colleges and Universities, All-University Recognition for Leadership.

University of Kentucky

Business

I attended summer school.

Activities and Societies: I worked at the campus radio stations.

The University of Texas at Austin

Radio-TV-Film

I didn’t feel comfortable at the University of Texas.  I had a lot of bad dates, and I wasn’t comfortable with all the hippies.  When my parents moved from Lubbock, I seized the opportunity to leave Austin and get back to Lubbock and Texas Tech.

Activities and Societies: I pledged Sigma Phi Epsilon fraternity, and I was involved in student government activities.


Additional Information

Websites:

Twitter:

Interests:

Travel, photography, writing, helping others, exposing corruption

Groups and Associations:

  • Media Professionals
  • Government Corruption
  • Media Professionals Worldwide
  • Texas Tech Alumni
  • Texas Tech Alumni Association Networking Group
  • Texas Tech Group
  • Texas Tech University – Students and Alumni
  • Texas Tech University Graduates
  • Texas Tech University Networking Group
  • Texas Tech University Rawls College of Business Alumni
  • Travel, Destination and Tourism Photography

Personal Information

Address:

windsorinsouthdakota@yahoo.com

Marital status:  Single

#BillWindsor
#WilliamMWindsor
#LawlessAmerica

 

My Story

 

My story is the discovery that our legal system is broken. 

I always knew there were problems, but I thought it was just dishonest lawyers.  I never dreamed that federal judges are corrupt and routinely commit crimes because they have the power to do anything they want.

The following is from a Petition for Writ of Mandamus filed by me with the United States Supreme Court, and I have inserted some additional information from various affidavits and court filings to tell My Story:

In August 2005, Maid of the Mist Corporation and Maid of the Mist Steamboat Company, Ltd. (jointly “Maid”) filed a civil action against Alcatraz Media, LLC, Alcatraz Media, Inc. (jointly “Alcatraz”) and William M. Windsor (“Windsor” or the “Petitioner”) (Alcatraz and Windsor jointly “A&W.”) The action was filed in Gwinnett County Georgia Court. It was removed to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia in March 2006 as Civil Action No. 1:06-CV-0714-ODE (“MIST-1”). The action was originally assigned to Judge Forrester, but he recused himself, and the case was assigned to Judge Orinda D. Evans (“Judge Evans.”) [1]  Neither Alcatraz nor I knew Judge Forrester, and neither of us had ever had any dealings of any type with him.  It seems he recused himself due to some relationship with Maid of the Mist or their attorneys.

We need to go back a few months for all of this to make sense.  On March 3, 2005, Maid of the Mist entered into an oral agreement with Alcatraz to allow Alcatraz to purchase tickets for the boat ride at Niagara Falls from Maid at a discounted rate for the entire 2005 season (April to October).  The terms of the oral contract were specific.  The period for the oral contract was less than a year, so it was a binding oral contract under Georgia law.

Sandra Carlson of Maid of the Mist entered into the contract with Alcatraz.  I was visiting Alcatraz’s office that day when one of the salespeople needed some tickets for a group to ride the Maid of the Mist.  I knew that the business development person handling the dealings with Maid of the Mist was unavailable as her mother had just had a stroke.  So, while I didn’t work for Alcatraz, I’ll do anything to help my son, so I picked up the phone and called Sandra Carlson at Maid of the Mist.  She entered into the contract with me for Alcatraz to buy tickets for the entire 2005 season.  The discussion was very specific because I could see from the file that Carlson had been a flake to deal with.  Carlson also made the same agreement with Carolyn Ballard Bazzo (“Bazzo”), who called her while her mother was sleeping in the hospital.

Carlson sent faxes to both Bazzo and me following the telephone conversations of March 3, 2005.  Maid agreed to provide Certificates of Insurance naming Alcatraz as additional insured, and Maid did.  Maid agreed to provide information for Alcatraz to use on its web sites, and they did.  Alcatraz agreed to submit a voucher (E-Ticket) for Maid’s approval, and Alcatraz did.  Maid approved the voucher.  The approval of the voucher was the final obligation agreed to when the contract was entered into on March 3, 2005.  It still took a long time and a lot of hassles to get the information needed from Sandra Carlson, but it finally was resolved in early April.

Alcatraz advertised for Maid of the Mist boat tours at Alcatraz’s website www.niagarafallstours.net.  Alcatraz advertised for various tours in the Niagara Falls area, as well as for tours in Canada, New York and in others cities in the Northeast.  This website did not represent that it was sponsored by Maid.  Rather, it expressly represented that it was run by Alcatraz.  Alcatraz has also used additional websites to promote its 74 different Niagara Falls tours and activities and its 17 tours that include a Maid of the Mist ticket.

Alcatraz began generating excellent sales for Maid of the Mist in March 2005.

Alcatraz honored all of the terms of the oral contract with Maid.  Maid breached the contract in a number of ways.  Maid refused service to some Alcatraz customers who had valid E-Tickets.  Initially, this was probably because no one at Maid bothered to advise the ticket takers that Alcatraz was issuing valid E-Tickets.  Maid informed some Alcatraz customers that they should purchase their tickets directly from Maid at a lower price and file chargebacks against Alcatraz to get their money back from Alcatraz.  Not cool.  Maid charged Alcatraz for some customers who did not receive the boat ride.  Maid failed to give Alcatraz certain discounts that had been promised.

For reasons unknown at the time, Maid created false stories in an attempt to damage Alcatraz and manufacture a claim with which to breach the contract with Alcatraz.  Upon information and belief, this was because Maid was in breach of contract with the Niagara Parks Commission (“NPC”) and the New York State Office of Parks, Recreation, and Historic Preservation (“OPRHP”).

Carlson and Schul sent letters, faxes, and emails for Maid to Alcatraz that contained false claims.  Glynn, Schul, and Carlson made false claims by telephone.  Carlson sent letters on June 14 and July 19, 2005 that contained false claims of problems caused by Alcatraz.  The July 19, 2005 letter asked for Alcatraz to make changes to its E-Ticket.  Alcatraz made changes to the E-Ticket.   Carlson then sent an email claiming the July 19 letter asked for changes to the web site, but the letter said no such thing.  Schul then sent a letter and emails that contained false claims of problems caused by Alcatraz.  On July 29, 2005, Maid breached the contract with Alcatraz by declaring the contract to be terminated.  But the oral contract was for the entire 2005 season, and Maid of the Mist did not have the right to terminate it until it expired in mid October 2005.

It was all totally bizarre.  It made no sense at the time.  Alcatraz tried repeatedly for a month to get Maid or Maid’s Attorneys to speak with Alcatraz about the problem, but they refused.  My son asked me to handle the legal stuff for him, so I am the one who tried to get them to respond.

Despite Maid’s written promise to Alcatraz on July 29, 2005 that Maid would honor tickets purchased prior to July 29, 2005, Maid subsequently refused to honor some Alcatraz tickets purchased prior to that date.  Not surprising.  Maid refused to honor these tickets despite the fact that Alcatraz had provided Maid with over $10,000 in prepayments, a written payment guarantee, and credit card authorization to charge any tickets purchased for the 2005 season, thus guaranteeing Maid that it would be paid for any Alcatraz customer who showed up with a voucher.  It was the first week in August 2005 when Maid of the Mist began refusing service to Alcatraz customers.

Maid of the Mist began defaming Alcatraz and telling Alcatraz’s customers that Alcatraz was an Internet Scam. (Alcatraz had been in business for 11 years and was the largest company in the world selling tickets and tours as Maid of the Mist knew quite well.)  In August, September, and October 2005, Maid refused to honor vouchers for more than eight hundred (800) Alcatraz customers.

Alcatraz issued refunds to customers who placed orders that it believed would not be honored and to customers who contacted Alcatraz who claimed that Maid refused to honor the Alcatraz vouchers.  Every customer was refunded by Alcatraz.  Maid sold tickets to Alcatraz’s customers directly and generated a greater income as a result.

I am the father of the 75% owner of Alcatraz.  I have never been an officer, director, shareholder, owner, investor, or employee of Alcatraz, but I stepped in to handle the legal problem on behalf of Alcatraz.  This is important because Maid of the Mist might have had a basis to sue me if I was involved in the company in one of those manners, but I wasn’t.  For the first three years of Ryan’s company, I was CEO of a large company in Ohio.  Ryan started and built Alcatraz all on his own.

I placed five phone calls, sent five faxes, and sent approximately 20 emails from July 28, 2005 until August 28, 2005 in an attempt to get someone from Maid or a Maid attorney to speak with me about the problem.    No one from Maid of the Mist and no Maid attorney ever spoke to Alcatraz or me until after the lawsuit was filed on August 29, 2005. 

Since it appeared that Maid of the Mist was hell bent on breaching the contract and screwing my baby boy’s company, I called the Niagara Parks Commission (“NPC”) to see if we could go into competition with Maid of the Mist.  I was turned away, but the NPC told Maid of the Mist about my call.  Less than three weeks later, we were sued.

It was August 25, 2005 when Christopher Glynn (“Glynn”), President of Maid of the Mist signed a sworn affidavit to be used with the filing of the lawsuit [MIST-1 Docket #1.]    46 of the 50 paragraphs were false or incorrect.  Proof to show that as many as 46 of the statements are false is set out on pages 364 to 553 of Dec #25 (MIST-1 Docket #462).

Glynn swore that his statements were his personal knowledge, but that was false.  Personal knowledge means the information is known from direct experience rather than hearing about it from someone else or making it up.  Glynn swore that everything in his affidavit was true and correct, but that was false.  In deposition testimony, Maid Marketing VP Timothy P. Ruddy testified that some of the statements in Glynn’s August 25, 2005 affidavit were not true.  In his deposition testimony, Controller Robert J. Schul testified that some of the statements in Glynn’s August 25, 2005 affidavit were not true.  Alcatraz, Bazzo, and I testified in depositions that statements in Glynn’s affidavit were not true at all, and we had a lot of proof in emails and letters.

The drafting of this affidavit by Mr. Carl Hugo Anderson, Mr. Marc W. Brown, and Mr. Arthur P. Russ, while under oath as officers of the court as members of the Bar, was improper, and statements in the affidavit were known to be false by the attorneys.

When Maid sued, they sued Alcatraz and me personally.  The lawsuit falsely and maliciously claimed that I operated my own business and did all types of things including theft and bribery.  Maid and Maid attorneys knew this was false.  Ruddy testified that I should not have been included in many of the sworn paragraphs in Glynn’s affidavit and verification.  Maid never produced any evidence to prove that Maid had any valid legal claim against me for anything.

When I became involved in all of this, I was very naïve.  I felt that the judicial system was fair and honest, so I was confident that the courts would vindicate us and put Christopher Glynn in jail for perjury for a long, long time. (Five years later, I knew that our federal court system is totally corrupt.  I am not an attorney, but I had spent over 7,000 hours studying the law, so I know more about the legal issues in this case than most attorneys.)

On behalf of Alcatraz and myself, I filed a sworn response to Maid’s lawsuit stating under oath under penalty of perjury that everything Glynn had said was false.

Nothing much happened in the fall of 2005, but in March 2006 after we subpoenaed Glynn for a deposition, Maid of the Mist filed a motion with the court seeking a temporary restraining order.  That was when Judge Orinda D. Evans was assigned to the case.  She read the two affidavits that were totally contradictory about the facts, and she granted the TRO to Maid.  Our attorney and I were shocked.

When a party to a lawsuit gets a TRO, they have to post a bond to cover the other party’s costs in the lawsuit if they lose.  We asked for $250,000.  Judge Evans only required $5,000.  It should have been over $1.5 million as it turns out.  Awarding such a ridiculously low bond was another strong signal of the bias of Judge Evans (something that judges are sworn not to have).

At first, I suspected that Judge Evans had an incompetent young law clerk who was making a mess of this.  I thought the judge just wasn’t paying attention.  It didn’t take long for me to discover that Judge Evans was simply a bad judge.  Then it didn’t take me long after that to begin organizing the proof that she was a dishonest, corrupt judge.  

Every order that Judge Evans issued was against us.  Out of 40 contested motions, it was 40 for Maid of the Mist and zero for Alcatraz and me.  This was all due to the dishonesty of Judge Orinda D. Evans.

During the discovery period, we took depositions and obtained documents.  Our goal in all of this was to prove in THEIR WORDS that the verified complaint was totally false.  We succeeded. 

In February 2007, Judge Orinda D. Evans gave us a short meeting in her chambers.  I informed her that we had documented proof of over 400 counts of perjury and that we had proven that the verified complaint was totally false.  She refused to allow it to be discussed.

At this point, I felt for sure that she was corrupt.  But then she said a few things that caused our attorney and me to think we had won the case.  But as she had done many times before, she reversed herself or “forgot” those things later.  Any time we though we prevailed on something, she ignored that and turned whatever it was against us.

Shortly after the February 7, 2007 meeting, Maid of the Mist filed two contracts under seal for an in camera inspection (review by only her).  These were their contracts with the governments of Ontario and New York State.  We felt for sure that they would have vital information for our defense.  Judge Evans reviewed them and said they would not be provided to us.  That is supposed to mean they were not relevant to the case.

All types of dishonesty by Maid of the Mist, their attorneys, and Judge Orinda D. Evans took place from 2005 to now.  It would just take way too long to recount it all.  But rest assured that I have it all documented.

The next big development was motions for summary judgment.  This is a legal procedure where a judge can end a case without a jury if it is so clearly one-sided.  If there is a “fact issue,” an important issue in the case that is disputed, there cannot be a summary judgment.  EVERYTHING was disputed in this case, so a summary judgment was impossible.

But you’ve already figured out what happened.  Judge Evans granted the summary judgment for Maid of the Mist and ordered Alcatraz and me to pay over $400,000 in Maid of the Mist’s legal fees.  To say that I was shocked was an understatement.  I read the order, and it was one false statement and lie after another.  The documents filed with the court proved her order was totally false. 

Judge Evans granted the summary judgment to Maid on a legal cause of action called “tortious interference” with alleged damages of less than $100, though (1) A&W provided sworn affidavits from the four customers involved who allegedly did not spend $100, and each swore that they did buy tickets from Maid, so there were no damages, and (2) the only sworn testimony before the court was that there was an oral contract breached by Maid, and thus there was no tortious interference by Alcatraz.  Damages are a requirement for tortious interference, so the fact that there were no damages was critical.  We proved that with affidavits from the people Maid claimed created the damages. 

Alcatraz and I swore under oath at all times that Maid made up all of the sworn claims in the Verified Complaint and motion for injunctive relief in MIST-1. Judge Evans refused to even consider A&W’s charges of perjury, false sworn pleadings, and Rule 11 violations by Maid and Maid’s attorneys.  I documented all the lies with citations to the record.

We appealed the summary judgment order to the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals.  Naïve me thought we would finally get this overtured and headed in the right direction.  But three judges rubber-stamped Judge Evans’ order.  They TOTALLY ignored every error of law and fact raised by our attorneys.  I was flabbergasted.  I was literally sick for several weeks from it.  I worked closely with the attorneys and researched all of the appeal issues, so I knew the Eleventh Circuit had to overturn Judge Evans.  When I was able to think straight, I figured they supported their friend, Judge Evans, to protect her from indictment, conviction, and impeachment.

So, on to The Supreme Court, I thought.  Our attorneys then educated me that The Supreme Court is no longer a court of appeals.  They don’t review actions of the appellate courts.  They decide if a case is interesting enough to them.  The odds of that in 2009 were 1 out of 100.  We were told it could cost us another $250,000 in legal fees if we went on, and we might be held responsible for Maid of the Mist’s legal fees since that had happened to us before.  That would mean $500,000 or more.  So, through clenched teeth, we reached an out-of-court settlement with Maid in December 2008 to stop the outrageous legal expense in MIST-1. Alcatraz and I refused to provide and did not provide general releases to Maid or Maid’s Attorneys.  We refused to provide releases because I was determined  to go after them again.

I tried and tried to find an attorney to represent me, but no attorney was willing to sue a judge.  They felt the federal judges would ruin them if they did.

So, in April 2009, I began efforts (representing myself) to reopen the case pursuant to FRCP Rule 60(b) primarily due to fraud upon the courts. A major factor was the discovery of new evidence that had been concealed from us by Maid and Judge Evans.[2]  I obtained copies of the two contracts that Maid had been ordered to file under seal with Judge Evans.  As soon as I looked at them, I knew that they were vital to our case.  After obtaining some additional information through Freedom of Information Act requests, I felt sure that Maid of the Mist had filed bogus documents with Judge Evans.  So, my task was simple; get the court to produce those documents, and we would get the case reopened and win.  The bad guys would go to prison, and the Windsors would live happily ever after.

Surprise, surprise, Judge Evans refused.  She began issuing perjury-filled orders.  I knew now that she was as corrupt as a judge could possible be.  The only reason to keep the documents hidden was to hide the fact that she had committed perjury and obstruction of justice…and to protect Maid of the Mist from losing the lawsuit and having its key managers all found guilty of hundreds of counts of perjury.

(One of the attorneys who refused to represent me out of fear of the judges gave me some advice.  He told me to appeal early and often, so I did.  As a result, I now have dozens of orders from Judge Evans, Judge Duffey, and the Eleventh Circuit.  This gives me dozens and dozens and dozens of documents that establish the dishonesty and corruption.)

Not to be blocked without a fight after Judge Evans tried to block my efforts, I subpoenaed Judge Evans!  This probably doesn’t happen very often.  Then some truly bizarre things happened.  Judge Evans filed a motion in her own court in my case.  Judges can’t do that, but she did.  She hired the United States Attorney’s Office (the same people who are supposed to go after corrupt judges).  On June 3, 2009, the U.S. Attorney representing Judge Evans filed a motion to quash a subpoena for the deposition in MIST-1. [Pet.App.171 — Mandamus Affidavit #1 — “M-Aff #1”, ¶39.] [3] [Deposition Action Doc. 1.] [4]  The motion was referred to Judge William S. Duffey (“Judge Duffey”), and this created Civil Action 1:09-CV-01543-WSD (the “Deposition Action”).[5]

Judge Duffey had never had any dealings with me prior to the referral of the motion to quash.  I had never heard the name “Judge William S. Duffey” either.  There was no conference held, and there was no hearing held, despite my motions requesting both.[6]  On June 8, 2009, Judge Duffey stayed the properly subpoenaed deposition.[7]  Judge Duffey made a number of incorrect statements in the stay order dated June 8, 2009.[8] The order was totally pro-Judge Evans, and it indicated that Judge Duffey may be biased.[9]

On June 10, 2009, the U.S. Attorney supplemented Judge Evans’ motion to quash.[10]  On June 18, 2009, I filed a Motion for Reconsideration of the Order Staying Case and the Twenty-Ninth Declaration of William M. Windsor (Dec #29).[11] [12] This was filed to note errors in Judge Duffey’s order.[13]  On June 30, 2009, an Order to Quash the Deposition of Judge Evans was issued by Judge Duffey.[16] [17] The order described me as “scurrilous and irresponsible.”  The legal definition of scurrilous is “evil.”  The legal definition of irresponsible is “mentally or financially incapable.”  I am neither scurrilous nor irresponsible!

This was written by a man who did not know me, had never even seen me, and who made such a statement and decision based solely on my three uncontroverted sworn affidavits.  In 2009, there were zero (0) affidavits filed by Maid in MIST-1, the Deposition Action, or MIST-2.  So, my testimony and evidence stood alone as the record before the court.[18]  

The only explanation for this slander is that Judge Duffey was predisposed to bias against me because I had the audacity to try to depose Judge Evans to obtain information that was available only from Judge Evans that I desperately needed to reopen the case in MIST-1.[19]  There is nothing scurrilous and irresponsible in the three affidavits that Judge Duffey had before him when he entered the June 30, 2009 order — Dec #29, Dec #35, and Dec #34.  The statements made therein are no different than the statements made herein.  Judge Evans made as many as 200 false statements in two orders in MIST-1. She knew statements that she made in her orders were false.  She obstructed justice by concealing documents from me.  These are facts, proven with evidence that I filed in each of the three civil actions.

On July 27, 2009, I filed Civil Action No. 1:09-CV-02027-WSD (“MIST-2″), an independent action in equity for fraud upon the court and RICO.[20]  On July 28, 2009, when I was told by the District Court Clerk’s Office that Judge Duffey (the judge who called me “scurrilous and irresponsible”) would be presiding in MIST-2, I immediately went home and prepared a Motion to Recuse Judge Duffey and a Motion for Change of Venue.  I returned later in the day and filed.[21]

On July 30, 2009, a TRO Hearing was held. Judge Duffey denied the motion.[22] Judge Duffey distributed an order on my motions regarding service of process on Canadian defendants, representation, motion to change venue, and motion to recuse. All were denied.[23]   Judge Duffey was antagonistic and biased in the hearing.  Details of this are provided in the Transcript of the Temporary Restraining Order Hearing.[24]  False statements in the July 30, 2009 order are listed in the Affidavit of Prejudice.[25]

On August 4, 2009, I filed an Emergency Motion to Recuse Judge Duffey.  I advised Judge Duffey that I would seek a Writ of Mandamus if there was not a prompt response.  This motion appears on the MIST-2 Docket as a “Motion for Leave” because Judge Duffey ordered that I must first submit proposed motions to him with a request for approval to file.[26]  This motion was pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §144.  The filing included an Affidavit of Prejudice[27] and a 28 U.S.C.§144 Certificate of Good Faith.[28]

On August 10, 2009, I filed a Petition for a Writ of Mandamus with the Eleventh Circuit seeking to have Judge Duffey disqualified.[29]  The Affidavit of Prejudice[30] and a 28 U.S.C.§144 Certificate of Good Faith[31] were included as exhibits.  On September 17, 2009, the Eleventh Circuit denied the Petition for a Writ of Mandamus.[33]

At some point during all this, I took my first petition for writ of certiorari (appeal) to The Supreme Court.  The Supreme Court decided it was “not worthy” of their consideration.  I spelled out the fraud and corruption for them, but they ignored it.

Like the Energizer Bunny, I just kept going.  Every order issued by Judge Evans and Judge Duffey was not valid based upon the facts or the law.  They were totally corrupt.  The judges didn’t make mistakes.  They were intentionally committing crimes to try to stop me. 

I reported all of this to the United States Attorney (same one who represents Judge Evans), the FBI, the Justice Department, every member of the House and Senate Judiciary Committees, and many others.  No one would do anything!  They completely ignored me.

So, I sued them.  I prepared everything and flew to Washington, DC to file there as I thought I would find honest judges in the shadow of The Capitol and The Supreme Court.  I ran right smack dab into Judge Richard J. Leon.  He proved to be just as corrupt.  He dismissed my case on bogus grounds and did a lot of nasty stuff to me.  At this point, I started to realize that the corruption in our federal courts may be everywhere.  I don’t know that yet, but from the reports I have gotten from people all over the country, I suspect it is true.  We have a Constitutional Crisis on our hands.  The federal judges have hijacked the Constitution, and they are holding us all hostage.

I continued my efforts in Judge Evans’ court and Judge Duffey’s court, and they lied and cheated me every step of the way.  I appealed just about everything to the Eleventh Circuit, and they lied and cheated me every step of the way.  In fact, in 62 pages of orders (perhaps 25 orders) from the Eleventh Circuit, they never ever, even once, addressed ANY of my points or error or law.  They ignored the facts and what the law actually provides and ruled against me in one sentence orders much of the time.

The abuse has escalated.  Judge Evans found me in contempt of court.  She warned me that “You are playing with fire.”  She threatened to put me in jail.  She fined me.  She hit me with more legal fees.  Lying every step of the way.  Violating the law again and again and again.  Same for Dishonest Duffey.  He’s just as bad — maybe worse — a real snake.  Most of his lies are proven with documents that he pretends do not exist.

Judge Duffey and Judge Evans have taken the unbelievable corrupt acts to a new level.  They have the Clerk of the Court doing all types of things.  My filings magically disappear.  I presented a new lawsuit to be filed, and they refuse to file it.  There is no legal right whatsoever for them to do this. but there is nowhere to turn.  I will try filing in Washington, DC again, but that is probably a waste of time.

At this point, I had two appeals pending in Washington DC, a dozen at the Eleventh Circuit, and one at The Supreme Court.  During a conversation with a clerk at The Supreme Court, I learned by accident that one can file a petition for writ of mandamus with The Supreme Court.  This is not an appeal, so it isn’t something that they can ignore.  They have to render a decision on it.  So I filed three.  One each to disqualify Judge Orinda D. Evans, Judge William S. Duffey, and one for the seven corrupt judges who I have identified at the Eleventh Circuit.  The Supreme Court has given the accused judges until December 15 to file responses.

This should be a landmark decision.  I have asked The Supreme Court whether they will stop federal judges from voiding the Constitution.  I have asked them whether they will expose the corruption in the federal courts.  I have asked them whether federal judges may continue to ignore the facts, ignore the law, and violate the Constitutional rights of the people who appear as parties in their courts.  I prayed that they would have the guts to blow the corruption wide open, but they are all products of the same corrupt system, so I am shocked but not surprised that the Supreme Court issued three rulings on January 18, 2011 that allow federal judges to continue to violate the Constitution, treat it as if it doesn’t exist, and ignore the law and the facts.  My best chance is if this story gets out to enough people that we get public pressure building to have someone somewhere do something.

 Judges are supposed to tell the truth at all times, but these judges have made false statements routinely.  These were material false statements made under the judges’ oath of office in a federal proceeding.  These judges knew statements that they made were false.

Judges are supposed to provide due process to the parties in their courts, but I have had just about every form of due process denied.  I have not been allowed to present evidence, call witnesses, cross examine witnesses, have an impartial judge, and much more.

 These judges routinely ignored the facts and the law and even invented their own facts.[43]  These judges have made rulings that are absolutely contrary to the law.  Judge Evans even denied us any ability to obtain the names of witnesses that we needed to depose.  She granted a summary judgment for Maid on the key issue in the case — an oral agreement for six months in 2005 — based upon the following: Maid testified that its president was not aware of an agreement with Alcatraz.  There was no other testimony from Maid other than this one statement in the Verified Complaint! Alcatraz provided a Verified Answer, multiple sworn affidavits, and extensive deposition testimony detailing the exact terms of the oral agreement from the people who made the oral agreement with Maid.  This clearly created at least a fact issue that defeated summary judgment, but Judge Evans invented facts that weren’t true and weren’t in the record, ignored the truth, and claimed her facts trumped the A&W’s sworn testimony.  As there was a contract, there was no tortious interference, but there was breach of contract by Maid, and A&W should have won the case.[44]

Detailed background facts regarding the judicial misconduct of these judges is provided in the three petitions for writ of mandamus:

Judge Evans

Judge Duffey

Judges of the Eleventh Circuit

Katherine Albrecht asked me on her radio show why I have kept going.  My friends and relatives will tell you that I am the most tenacious person they have ever known.  I will not stop.  I will get these judges indicted, convicted, and impeached, or I will die trying.  They “stole” from my child.  I’ll fight back against anyone who messes with me wrongfully, but you mess with one of my children or grandchildren, and you’ve declared war against me.

I obviously have a personal stake in all of this.  Most people who pursue a cause do, but now, I have met and spoken with so many people who have been cheated by corrupt judges that I feel I have a big responsibility to them as well.  I will fight for everyone.

My son said, “Dad, all of this is well and good, but what is your solution to the problems?”  I sat down at the keyboard, and did a brain dump.  Here are my ideas to correct the problem of judicial corruption.

I have two grandchildren – M1 and Pogo.  I drove M1’s carpool once a week.  She is unbelievably intelligent and worldly for a seven-year-old.  As we drove home one day, she told me they were studying Martin Luther King.  She asked me to tell her about those times, so I did.  She asked me what I did to stop the prejudice and all the problems.  I told her that I was never prejudiced, but I didn’t really do anything.  She asked if I had ever done anything that made a big difference in the world.  I said, no, unfortunately not.  She quickly assured me that she would make a difference in the world.  I absolutely believe that is true.  Well, I hope I can do something vitally important to every American with my efforts to expose corruption in the federal courts.  We are all in trouble.  M1 and I want to help.

Update – January 2, 2012

The above story only covers until mid-2011.  So much more has happened.  I stay so busy with all of this that I don’t know when I will have time to update “My Story.”  But everything else that I will summarize is in articles that appear on LawlessAmerica.com.

I now know that our courts are hopelessly corrupt.

[1] MIST-1_Doc.1.

[2] MIST-1_Docs.361 and 362.

[3] The Mandamus Affidavit of William M. Windsor is on pages 161-185 in the Appendix (Pet.App.). “M-Aff #” is the abbreviation used for this affidavit herein. “Doc.” is the abbreviation for Docket used herein.

[4] “Pet.App. ###” indicates page number in the Appendix to this Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

[5] Pet.App.171 — M-Aff #1, ¶40.

[6] Pet.App.171 — M-Aff #1, ¶41.

[7] Deposition Action_Doc.4; Pet.App.172 — M-Aff #1, ¶42.

[8] Pet.App.161-170, 190-191, Affidavit of Prejudice ¶¶34-67 and 118-121.

[9] Pet.App.172 — M-Aff #1, ¶43.

[10] Deposition Action_Doc.8; Pet.App.127 — M-Aff #1, ¶45.

[11] Declarations and affidavits of William M. Windsor have been numbered. “Dec #__” is used as the abbreviation for each. Dec #5 is the Fifth, Dec #34 is the Thirty-Fourth, etc.

[12] Deposition Action_Doc.15.

[13] Pet.App.172 — M-Aff #1, ¶47.

[14] Deposition Action_Doc.21; Pet.App.172 — M-Aff #1, ¶49.

[15] Deposition Action_Doc.24; Pet.App.173 — M-Aff #1, ¶50.

[16] Deposition Action_Doc.32.

[17] Pet.App.24.

[18] Pet.App.173 — M-Aff #1, ¶51.

[19] Pet.App.173 — M-Aff#1, ¶51.

[20] Pet.App.173-174, ¶53; MIST-2_Doc.1.

[21] MIST-2_Docs.15 and 17; Pet.App.174 — M-Aff #1, ¶55.

[22] MIST-2_Doc.31.

[23] Pet.App.19; Pet.App.174 — M-Aff #1, ¶56; MIST-2_Doc.22.

[24] MIST-2_Doc.48; Pet.App.174, ¶56.

[25] Pet.App.71-77, ¶¶121-141; Pet.App.174 — M-Aff #1, ¶56.

[26] MIST-2_Doc.36.

[27] Pet.App.161.

[28] Pet.App.114; Pet.App.174-175 — M-Aff #1, ¶57.

[29] Pet.App.116.

[30] Pet.App.161

[31] Pet.App.114.

[32] Mist-2_Doc.1.

[33] Pet.App.4.

[34] Pet.App.186.

[35] Pet.App.3 and 18.

[36] Pet.App.A.

[37] Pet.App.175 — M-Aff #1, ¶59-60.

[38] Pet.App.176 — M-Aff #1, ¶62.

[39] See MIST-1_Doc.474, Pet.App.176 — M-Aff #1, ¶63.

[40] MIST-1_Doc.377, Exhibits 9 and 22; see Pet.App.90-101, ¶¶189-264.

[41] MIST-1_Doc.174, P23: 24-25, P24: 1-7, P34: 4-7, P44: 6-8.

[42] MIST-1_Doc.361.

[43] Pet.App.99, ¶245; Pet.App.178 — M-Aff #1, ¶78.

[44] MIST-2_Doc.1.

[45] MIST-1_Doc.406.

[46] MIST-1_Doc.462.

[47] MIST-2_Doc.1.

[48] Pet.App.85-104, ¶¶172-276.

 

My name is William Michael Windsor.  This is my story, and I’m stickin’ to it. Copyright 2013, William Michael Windsor.  See http://LawlessAmerica.com, http://facebook.com/billwindsor1, and http://youtube.com/lawlessamerica.