Tag: William M. Windsor
Jeff Ashton Violates Rules and Prepares to Deliver Death Blow to William M Windsor
I advised them that I am filing additional criminal charges. I extended the courtesy of calling Renee Urban of Adams | Coogler on 4/11/2023 to give her the opportunity to deny that she was involved in the forgery and theft of my e-filing account. She refused to answer and refused to connect me with purported attorney Jonathan Blake Mansker. If Mansker doesn’t call me, I will take that as an indication of guilt. I will file criminal charges. There has been no response.
I asked that Jonathan Blake Mansker please call me. We have never spoken by phone. His assistant was unwilling to ask him to return my call. There has been no response.
Bill Windsor is suing all 69 Judges and their Bond Agent in Orange County Florida
69 Demand Letters were sent to Jeff Ashton’s fellow judges by William Michael Windsor. No one responded. So, yesterday, each judge was sent an email advising them that they and their bonding company are being sued.
The bond protects against:
“…conduct or omissions made by public officials that constitute a breach of his or her duties of the office. The bond serves as a guarantee against fraud or dishonesty and covers losses arising from neglect or other serious offenses.”
The emails say this:
I AM PREPARING TO SUE EACH OF YOU FOR VIOLATIONS OF YOUR OATH OF OFFICE AND VIOLATION OF YOUR BOND.
Please save this disabled 74-year-old one-handed man some time by responding to this email with a copy of your bond.
Please notify your bonding company that this is coming and that I will be seeking at least eight figures (##,###,###.##). You may want to let them know that the judge infamous for his Ashley Madison sexual involvement and losing the Casey Anthony case is responsible for your involvement.
5013 S Louise Ave #1134
Sioux Falls, SD 57108
352-661-8472
windsorinsouthdakota@yahoo.com
This email was written with only one finger because I no longer have the use of my left hand. Please excuse typos.
IMPEACH JEFF ASHTON.
See Jeffrey L. Ashton Home – Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton
The letters sent previously said this:
I believe Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton is either mentally impaired or as corrupt as they come, or both. He has violated the Codes, Rules, laws, and even the Cub Scout Oath. You have a duty to report him.
Please read my Affidavit or Petition. There are links on www.JeffreyLAshton.com I will be adding more evidence and charges. My Affidavit tells the story of one violation and abuse after another, though I haven’t gone into detail for the past year because he has committed one horrendous denial of due process that should get him removed.
His latest is a VOID ORDER depriving me of my Constitutional rights (EXHIBIT A). He claims to have revoked my right to represent myself in 2018-CA-010270-O without any notice or opportunity to be heard. The case law cited as authority by him establishes that what he did is illegal. He has abused me every way possible.
My personal injury case was supposed to go to trial after just over six years on May 22, 2023. I believe Jeffrey L. Ashton hopes I die before this can go to trial.
I need a new judge, and Jeffrey L. Ashton needs mental health help and a new job.
My life was destroyed on 5/5/2017 by an 18-wheeler. I was in good health and had never been in a car wreck, but now I’m 74 years old, have five herniated discs in my neck, four in my back, and Diastasis Recti, an allegedly inoperable abdominal injury.
It keeps getting worse. I recently lost the use of my left hand, and I can no longer walk. I can’t obtain medical treatment as I’m in bankruptcy and Medicare and others say the lawsuit has to be resolved first. The Defendants have ZERO evidence or testimony on liability admitted under oath, but they refuse to amend their fraudulent pleadings or admit liability. I suspect this is because they know they have Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton’s protection. The young attorney for the Defendants needs to go to acting school as he gave it away.
I have reason to suspect that Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton has been conspiring with the Defendants. I submit that he is part of a RICO organization. I hope you aren’t.
I am notifying every judge in the Ninth Circuit in hopes I will find good ones, like Judge Elizabeth Starr, who will take action. Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton has committed felonies and scores an F- on adherence to the Code of Judicial Conduct. He has violated every Canon. He has violated Rule 4-8.3(b) and Rule 4-8.4 of the Florida Rules of Professional Conduct. I am asking you to report him as is your duty pursuant to Canon 3E, Fla. Code Jud. Conduct, and Rule 2.160, Fla. R. Jud. Admin., as well as Rules Regulating the Florida Bar 3-4.2, 3-4.3, and 3-4.4.
Canon 3D (1) requires: “A judge who receives information or has actual knowledge that substantial likelihood exists that another judge has committed a violation of this Code shall take appropriate action.”
Canon 3E, Fla. Code Jud. Conduct, and Rule 2.160, Fla. R. Jud. Admin., mandate that a judge disqualify himself in a proceeding “in which the judge’s impartiality might reasonably be questioned.” He hasn’t, so you must act.
I don’t want to come across as rude when seeking your help, but I must refer you to 18 U.S.C. 4. I intend to file complaints and sue every judge in the Ninth Circuit who does not report Jeffrey L. Ashton with a copy to me as proof. If I don’t receive confirmation that you have reported him, I will sue you after first filing a complaint against you with the Judicial Commission.
Please send me your ISLN Number and a copy of your Oath and Bond.
I hope this will become a national news story. My father was CEO of WFTV Channel 9, and there are still people there who worked with him. And Casey Anthony, Ashley Madison, and other “sexy” news stories should make this a slam dunk when I, a disabled veteran who almost died on the Florida Turnpike, was denied a most fundamental Constitutional right, and am suing Jeffrey L. Ashton to create a non-profit to finance the 68% of us who cannot afford attorneys.
Please look for me in and around the Orange County Courthouse. My hair is gray, and my Walker is red and black. I will be protesting and gathering more evidence against Judge Jeffrey L. Ashley, or is it Ashton. I had no idea he was infamous until a few days ago.
Do you automatically get disqualified as a juror in voir dire if you know about the judge and think he’s a scumbag? Between those who know about Casey Anthony, Ashley Madison, and the Cub Scouts, we may not be able to seat a jury.
Sincerely,
William M. Windsor, Pro Se (at least used to be)
5013 S Louise Avenue #1134, Sioux Falls, SD 57108, bill@billwindsor.com — ###-###-####
P.S. I now live in a trailer in Lake Panasoffkee. My mail gets forwarded from South Dakota, so email is better.
How does Judge Jeff Ashton avoid Recusal if he’s so Dishonest
Judge Jeff Ashton is a crook. He lies, cheats, and destroys government property.
Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton hasn’t been recused or disqualified in Case 20`18-CA-0`10270-O despite at least a half dozen demands and requests by Plaintiff William Windsor. He avoids removal by lying, cheating, and having government property destroyed. CRIMINAL ACTIVITY.
Other pro se plaintiffs probably experience similar wrongdoing but don’t know what they can or should do.
I encourage all pro se parties (as a friend) to save everything you receive via email or snail mail, scan them and name them, and save them. pdf is your friend.
On 4/1/2021 at 05-29-58-AM, I filed my second written effort to get Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton removed. It was in my EXHIBITS folder, so it took just a second to find it after days of indexing all of my files for search in File Explorer.
I never delete email. So, today, I realized I needed to see if I still had emails from 4/1/2021. It took a while, but I found the Orange County Clerk’s Proof of Filing and Service, filed 4/1/2021 at 05-30 AM. HALLELUJAH!!!
Now I need to see it on the DOCKET! so, off I go online to the Clerk’s search site.
IT’S NOT ON THE DOCKET.
WTF.
Fortunately, I learned years ago that corrupt judges and corrupt court clerks delete docket entries that are problematic for judges and beneficial to litigants. I used to make copies of the dockets regularly, but too many 18-wheeler accidents and too many people to help. So, I wasn’t confident as I checked my massive files. But I have a 2021 pdf of the Docket when it showed that filing!!!!! Go to 4/1/2021.
Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton is a crook. He stole or had someone steal those documents. He has obstructed justice. I am just beginning to research all the crimes. I wonder if he used his skillful tongue, fingers, or member to make the theft, or did he use an accomplice?
Florida Statutes 839.13 – Falsifying records
Attorney’s Note
Under the Florida Statutes, punishments for crimes depend on the classification. In the case of this section:
Class | Prison | Fine |
---|---|---|
Felony of the second degree | up to 15 years | up to $10,000 |
Felony of the third degree | up to 5 years | up to $5,000 |
misdemeanor of the first degree | up to 1 year | up to $1,000 |
For details, see Fla. Stat. § 775.082(3)(d), Fla. Stat. § 775.082(3)(e) and Fla. Stat. § 775.082(4)(a)
The fact that I am a disabled senior may add additional charges.
https://www.flsenate.gov/Laws/Statutes/2019/812.014
https://www.flsenate.gov/Laws/Statutes/2018/0028.211
https://www.flsenate.gov/Laws/Statutes/2018/0119.021
https://www.flsenate.gov/Laws/Statutes/2022/499.68
Probably a federal crime or two.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1519
Tiffany Moore Russell has a problem. Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton’s Judicial Assistant, Keitra Davis, may be an accomplice. I have now sent both of them notices of violations under color of law.
I will be sending this to every judge in the Ninth District and to David H. Harris, General Counsel, Ninth Judicial Circuit Court of Florida, Ctaddh1@ocnjcc.org.
If there are felonies involved, David Harris, Lisa Munyon, and every judge has a duty to report these, or it is a violation of 18 USC 4.
I have reported this to the Orlando Police Department, The Orange County Sheriff, the Attorney General, the Governor, the FBI, the U.S. Department of Justice, the United States Attorney General, Ashley Madison, FriendFinder, and the Cub Scouts.
Read the 797 Day Report.
In 797 days, Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton has not granted a single Motion by a Pro Se Plaintiff
March 8, 2023 is the 797th day that Judge Jeff Ashton has been the judge in Windsor v. Longest and Boise Cascade.
In 797 days, William Windsor has not prevailed on one single, solitary motion.
Hitting the Fan of Jeffrey L. Ashton
And it’s only just begun.
Bill Windsor has distributed an Affidavit of Prejudice against Jeffrey L. Ashton
I mailed a copy to all 69 judges in his Ninth District in Central Florida, his wife (Rita Brockaway Ashton), each of his children, the Florida Bar Association, the University of Florida Law School, Casey Anthony, Ashley Madison, and the Cub Scouts.
Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton is a HUGE Liar
THE COURT (Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton): “Mr. Windsor, you e-mailed my JA 214 times since Thursday. Since Thursday.
WINDSOR: “Absolutely not, Your Honor.
THE COURT (Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton): “Well, you’re calling my secretary a liar and I know that she’s telling me the truth about that, so that ain’t going to happen. So I’ll block you from e-mail, again. If you have a lawyer that wants to communicate with us on your behalf, we will be happy to speak with him.” [EXHIBIT A – Transcript of Hearing 4/5/2021 – P.36: 9-25; P.37: 1-25; P.38: 1-4.]
I sent three emails to Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton’s Judicial Assistant from Thursday April 1, 2021 to Monday April 5, 2021. THREE (3) not 214. Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton is a liar, and calling me a liar in open court is a violation of the Code of Judicial Conduct.
I have every email saved on my computer, and I will be filing each and every one of them with the clerk as evidence.
I am not and will not receive a fair trial in the Ninth Judicial Circuit Court in Orange County, Florida due to the bias of Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton of that court against me and prejudice in favor of the Defendants and their attorney.
Motion to Disqualify Judge Jeffrey L Ashton filed with Affidavit of Prejudice
William M. Windsor has filed an Affidavit of Prejudice with his First Motion to Disqualify Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton in Case 2018-CA-010270-O in the Ninth Judicial Circuit in Orange County Florida.
This was filed less than one month after Jeff Ashton appeared as judge in the case that had been pending for years.
WILLIAM M. WINDSOR’S AFFIDAVIT OF PREJUDICE
OF JUDGE JEFFREY L. ASHTON
I, William M. Windsor, the undersigned, hereby declare under penalty of perjury:
- My name is William M. Windsor (“Windsor”). I will be 72-years-old on Friday, am absolutely competent to testify and represent myself, and have personal knowledge of the matters stated herein.
- This Affidavit of Prejudice of Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton (“Affidavit of Prejudice”) is offered in support of the Motion to Disqualify Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton (“Motion to Disqualify”).
- I am the Plaintiff in this action, and I am representing myself pro se.
- I am not an attorney. However, I have studied law, and I know improper actions by attorneys and judges when I see them. I see them in this case!
- I will not receive a fair trial in the Ninth Judicial Circuit Court in Orange County, Florida due to the prejudice of Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton (“Judge Ashton”) of that court against me and bias in favor of the Defendants and their attorneys.
- I first came to the realization on February 1, 2021 that Judge Ashton was prejudiced and biased in this case.
- I fear that I have not received and will not receive a fair trial with Judge Ashton. Judge Ashton is heartless and dishonest.
- Attached as EXHIBIT 1 is an affidavit I filed today. It is referenced and incorporated herein. It details my issues with Judge Ashton as to my current medical emergency. Judge Ashton refuses to delay a relatively meaningless hearing in this case about the DEFENDANTS disabling me and using the court system to inflict emotional distress. As I type this, I can’t see much out of my left eye.
- Judge Ashton has OUTRAGEOUSLY refused to reschedule a 2/2/2021 hearing with no justification whatsoever. This is bias at its almost worse.
- But that he refused to reschedule the 2/2/2021 hearing when Windsor has a medical emergency is bias at its worst.
- Judge Ashton could care less about Windsor, and the feeling is now more than mutual.
- Windsor has not been treated fairly by Judge Ashton. Judge Ashton has not demonstrated the impartiality required of a judge. He is demonstrating that he is a heartless person who has no business sitting in judgment on people.
- Windsor has a well-grounded fear that he will not receive a fair trial. Judge Ashton has ignored all of the prejudice and bias of Judge Kest, and he refused without proper consideration Windsor’s request to reconsider the corrupt orders of Judge Kest.
- Judge Munyon granted a protective order to stop discovery when there was no legal authority to do so. Judge Kest allowed that to continue. Judge Kest allowed hearings on frivolous motions by the Defendants while ignoring violations of his own rules and orders. Judge Kest outrageously stated in an order that two motions were not being set for hearings because they were motions for reconsideration when clearly they were no such thing. Judge Kest claimed Windsor made a false statement to the Court denying that the case had been stayed. The case was never stayed, and saying Windsor made a false statement to the Court was both improper and erroneous. Judge Kest ignored the fact that there was no legal basis given by the Defendants for either of the motions that Judge Kest ordered to be set for hearing. Judge Kest extended the trial date for another year when he will not even be a judge, with no consideration given to Windsor’s medical condition. Judge Kest announced at the Case Management Conference that he treats pro se parties the same as attorneys, but this is neither fair nor the law. Judge Kest indicated at the Case Management Conference that he had independently researched cases that Windsor had been involved in, and he threatened him with sanctions for frivolous motions under Florida Statute 57.105. Windsor has never filed anything frivolous. Judge Kest argued with Windsor over whether there had been the required “meet and confer” with the Defendants’ attorneys. Judge Kest claimed that a telephone bullying by Attorney Asstrin amounted to a “confer.” Windsor tried to explain that confer means an actual discussion. Judge Kest rejected that, yet he knew the specifics of the law while pro se Windsor did not. Windsor was absolutely right about the requirements to confer, and Judge Kest lied and claimed he was wrong. Judge Kest is a past president and Governor of the Bar Association, so he has been a very active member of a club that the Defense attorneys belong to that Windsor will never belong to. Judge Kest has been an attorney for 48 years and a judge for 17 years. He has seemingly developed disdain for pro se parties over the past 48 years. Windsor has these feelings because after studying the developments in this case, he saw Judge Kest acting with bias again and again. Judge Ashton dismissed without any consideration Windsor’s motion to have him reconsider Judge Kest’s orders. No honest judge could do that.
- This Affidavit of Prejudice clearly provides the facts and reasons for the belief that bias and prejudice exists. Dates, times, places, circumstances, and statements are itemized.
- Judge Ashton established a clearly fixed view about substantive pending trial matters, so this must raise concerns about the “appearance of impropriety,” a standard that must be safeguarded under applicable recusal law.
- Judge Ashton has violated my civil and constitutional rights under color of law.
- Judge Ashton has effectively denied my rights of the equal protection under the law under Article VI of the Constitution.
- Judge Ashton’s actions prove that he has exercised his power in this civil action for his own personal purposes rather than the will of the law or the common decency of man.
- I will not get a fair and impartial trial with Judge Ashton. He is prejudiced against me. He has already committed an unforgivable sin in this case by refusing to reconsider orders of Judge Kest that were issued without the required hearings. Judge Ashton acts like he is simply another in a string of corrupt Orange County judges who either dislike pro se parties or love insurance agencies with deep pockets.
- All I want is to have someone fair and impartial with an open mind to listen to the facts and review as much of the evidence as is needed to prove each of my claims. It is obvious to me that Judge Ashton doesn’t care about the facts and doesn’t want to apply the law.
- The United States Constitution guarantees an unbiased Judge who will always provide litigants with full protection of ALL RIGHTS. Judge Ashton is biased against me. Judge Ashton has demonstrated this.
- This motion, affidavit, certificate of good faith, and memorandum of authorities meet the requirements for a motion to disqualify.
- This Affidavit of Prejudice states the facts and the reasons for the belief that bias and prejudice exist. The reasons for the belief are material and stated with particularity.
- I have a well-grounded fear that I will not receive a fair trial.
- This affidavit meets the time requirement of Rule 2.330 of the Florida Rules of Judicial Administration which provides that a motion for recusal “shall be filed “within a reasonable time not to exceed 10 days after discovery of the facts constituting the grounds….” It was on February 1, 2021 that I discovered grounds.
- This affidavit is accompanied by a “certificate of counsel of record.” As I am the only person of record and I am a pro se Plaintiff, the certificate is from me, and it is made in good faith.
- There has not been a previous motion to disqualify Judge Ashton.
FURTHER SAITH AFFIANT NOT.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed this 1st day of February, 2021.
Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton ignored William Windsor’s Medical Emergency in 2021.
On 2/1/2021, I had a medical emergency with my left eye. I have had three surgeries on that eye.
I first came to the realization on February 1, 2021 that Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton was prejudiced and biased in this case.
I fear that I have not received and will not receive a fair trial with Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton. Judge Jeff Ashton is heartless and dishonest.
I prepared the following affidavit and it was filed on 2/1/2021. It details my issues with Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton as to my medical emergency. Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton refused to delay a relatively meaningless hearing in this case about the DEFENDANTS disabling me and using the court system to inflict emotional distress. As I typed it, I couldn’t see much out of my left eye.
VERIFIED AFFIDAVIT OF WILLIAM M. WINDSOR DATED 2/1/2021
I, William M. Windsor, the undersigned, hereby declare under penalty of perjury:
-
- I am over the age of 21, a living person, am competent to testify, and have personal knowledge of the matters stated herein.
- I object to the Court’s plans to hold a hearing tomorrow that I will be unable to attend.
- I am 72-years-old and in poor health since the Defendants’ 18-wheeler hit me at 70-miles-per-hour. I am in constant pain from nine herniated disks in my neck and back, and walking is a problem. I was in excellent shape before the accident. I am currently experiencing several medical emergencies.
- I broke a tooth, and it is extremely painful. I’m having serious problems with my left eye. And I may be having a significant side effect from a COVID-19 vaccination. I find this Court’s void of compassion to be absolutely unacceptable for any human being.
- As I have previously communicated, I received notice from the Court’s Judicial Assistant too late to prepare for a 2/2/21 hearing. It was impossible to meet the deadlines set by the Judicial Assistant in a command sent to me. As I communicated to this Court by motion, I also need to subpoena the attorneys for the Defendants prior to a hearing on attorney’s fees. Pro se parties do not have subpoena rights, so I have to drive to Orlando to obtain subpoenas from the Clerk of the Court. The attorneys for the Defendants have ignored my requests to take their depositions. The attorney for the Defendants recently filed an affidavit that requires investigation. I received it too late to do anything about it. The examination of the attorneys is likely to take several hours. I have found the attorneys to be extremely dishonest. The attorney for the Defendants could not have spent more than 15 minutes on the motion to compel that resulted in sanctions.
- I have essentially no money. I have been declared indigent by the Texas Supreme Court and the United States Supreme Court. EXHIBIT A is my motion for in forma pauperis approved by the U.S. Supreme Court. My debts exceed $1,100,000, and I haven’t been able to pay credit card bills for over a year. My total debt reduced from $1,500,000 to $1,169,000 since tis was prepared due to settlement with Sean D. Fleming for $1 and release of my claims against him. My total monthly expenses at present are $83,527 if I were to pay all my past due credit card bills. My only assets are $1,000 equity in my vehicle and $60,000 in a condo, my homestead. My secured debts exceed my assets. I believe all of my assets will be protected in bankruptcy. I believe the condo association will try to foreclose as I haven’t paid the $600 monthly “dues” for four months. If that happens, I will have to file bankruptcy. I have been working to stay afloat until I receive a large financial award from the jury in this case.
- Sanctions are supposed to be based on an ability to pay. I have no ability to pay. I will begrudgingly agree to have $100 deducted from the payment I receive from this lawsuit.
- I filed a motion to have Judge Ashton reconsider the outlandish orders of Judge Kest. It was just denied. I find this outrageous. It seems Judge Ashton is just as biased as Judge Kest. Denying this motion without considering the evidence or holding a hearing is absolutely improper.
- The Fifth District has made it clear that the trial court has the inherent discretionary power to reconsider any order entered prior to the rendition of final judgment in the cause. (Arnold v. Massebeau, 493 So. 2d 91 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986).) (See also North Shore Hospital, Inc. v. Barber, 143 So.2d 849 (Fla.1962); Commercial Garden Mall v. Success Academy, Inc., 453 So.2d 934 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984). Cf. Associated Medical Institutions, Inc. v. Imperatori, 338 So.2d 74 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); Rubin v. Baker, 276 So.2d 532 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973).) The only reason I can think of to deny the motion and do so without a hearing is prejudice. The only reason I can think of to deny a continuance of the hearing set for 2/2/2021 when I cannot participate is extreme prejudice. Judge Ashton provided NO reasons for his orders. The U.S. Supreme Court stated in Corcoran v. Levenhagen, 08–10495, decided October 20, 2009, that courts should explain their orders.
- I object to the hearing and being denied my rights to have the corrupt acts of Judge Kest and the monumental wrongdoing of the Defendants and their attorneys properly considered by this Court. I object to the denial of my motion for reconsideration of the corrupt acts of Judge Kest.
- I will file a motion to disqualify Judge Ashton, and I will file an appeal. These are my legal rights.
- In 2011, I had two cataract surgeries. The surgery on both eyes caused problems, including a hole poked into the retina of my left eye by the surgeon. I began “seeing things.” It began with what could best be described as a fireworks show “in my eyes” when my eyes were closed in bed at night. Then I saw big flies and even bigger roaches all around my desk. At first, they seemed real. Next came a curtain closing back and forth across my field of vision. It started as a shear and ended up a solid red.
- I raced to the eye doctor in Atlanta, Georgia. The doctors discovered a hole in the retina of my left eye. My left eye was quickly scheduled for surgery. I was sent home with eye patches to cover both eyes, and I was instructed to do nothing but recline with my head in a slightly-elevated position. Both eyes were done a week apart. The left eye had the retina repaired, and both eves had a “vitrectomy,” surgery in which the vitreous gel-like substance is removed. It is what fills the middle portion of the eye. I believe my gel was replaced with saline solution. I used to have floaters, but they were removed. The strange visions went away, but it took a long time to recover my reading eyesight. My vision has been 20/20 after the cataract-replacement lenses were implanted in my eyes. For a week or so, my reading vision has become poor.
- In 2016, I was diagnosed with Glaucoma. It had been at least two years since my eyes had been examined, and I lost some of my peripheral vision due to the Glaucoma. In 2018 and 2019, I had two more eye surgeries in Leesburg with Dr. Stacia Goldee of Mid-Florida Eye Center.
- Last Friday, I had the first COVID-19 vaccination. That night, I saw a ghost. I’d never seen a ghost before, but I saw a ghost. It was a slender brunette, very animated, talking with someone in the kitchen. I was not asleep or dreaming. I “saw” this while awake at night. I snapped a photo, and it is dark and spooky-looking, but doesn’t show a “ghost.” I would attach it, but it’s just a dark blur.
- The ghost did not return the next night, so I chalked it up to perhaps some type of reaction from the vaccination. A few days later, the ghost returned. Same woman; same outfit; same place in the kitchen. I snapped a photo, but it doesn’t show a ghost – just a squiggly green neon flash where the ghost was. I would have been totally freaked out from all of this if it wasn’t for my experience following eye surgery in 2011.
- This all sounds pretty crazy, but Google reports that “hallucinations” are a side effect of COVID-19 and the COVID-19 vaccine. There are some bizarre videos on YouTube with people telling their COVID hallucination stories.
- I have become concerned that the problem may be related to the retina in my left eye. My left eye has been cloudy and moderately painful of late. My vision has become very poor out of my left eye, and the imbalance between my eyes makes me dizzy. Unfortunately, I missed my regular Glaucoma check-ups due to the Pandemic; I’m supposed to be checked every six months, and it has been a year. I tried on Friday to get an appointment with the eye doctor I had used, but she does not accept the Cigna HMO Medicare Insurance that I have as of January 1, 2021 without a referral from the primary care doctor. That primary care doctor is new; I have never seen him, and I was unable to get a referral without first scheduling a full physical. I spoke with a nice lady there this morning, and she isn’t sure they accept my insurance. She asked me to bring the insurance card to their office to check, so I did. They do accept my insurance, but the first available appointment is March 23.
- I called Cigna to see what I can do. They were of little or no help. They referred me to Dr. Courtney Bovee, an ophthalmologist I have seen before, a doctor I really respect and like. I called Mid-Florida Eye Center to learn she is no longer with them, and they do not take my insurance. The surgeon who operated on my eyes twice, Dr. Stacia Goldee, is no longer with the firm either, apparently retired. I have called and left messages with the office of Dr. Anisha Patel, the last eye doctor I have seen.
- I have been on hold with Moderna for a half hour to report my potential side effect from the COVID-19 vaccine. I was just cut off and had to leave a message. I’m supposed to hear back in 24 hours.
- I see Dr. Golub at 10:30 a.m. on Tuesday and go to the hospital at 11:00 am.
- I have been approved by Cigna to go to the Emergency Room, and I will be there Tuesday morning at about 11:00 a.m. My eyes will be dilated, and an ophthalmologist will examine my retinas. The concern is that I have a vitreous detachment. Over time, the vitreous can shrink and slowly detach from your retina. Posterior Vitreous Detachment can cause health issues and can lead to permanent vision loss. This can cause a tear in the retina or a hole in the eye nerve. Those of us who are nearsighted, have had cataract surgery (and I’ve had four), or who have had some kind of trauma to the eyes are at a higher risk for PVD. I am told that this is very common at age 72, and I am in a high-risk category. This is not something I can or will ignore.
FURTHER SAITH AFFIANT NOT.
Sworn under penalty of perjury this 1st day of February, 2021,
_________________________________
William M. Windsor
Judge Jeff Ashton OUTRAGEOUSLY refused to reschedule a 2/2/2021 hearing with no justification whatsoever. This is bias at its almost worse.
But that he refused to reschedule the 2/2/2021 hearing when I had a medical emergency is bias at its worst.
Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton could care less about me, and the feeling is now more than mutual.
I was not treated the impartiality required of a judge. Jeff Ashton demonstrated that he is a heartless person who has no business sitting in judgment on people.
I have come to realize that he was pre-programmed to rule against me on anything and everything. I believe he was either instructed to do this by the Criminal Racketeering Operation at work in Orange County, or he was pad off.
I had a well-grounded fear that I would not receive a fair trial. Judge Jeff Ashton has ignored all of the prejudice and bias of Judge Kest, and he refused without proper consideration Windsor’s request to reconsider the corrupt orders of Judge Kest.
It was all corruption, loud and clear.
William Windsor’s Background
I, William M. Windsor, was born in Columbus, Georgia on 10/02/1948. I had the best parents in the world and a wonderful childhood,
I began my career as a junior at Texas Tech University. I became involved in the T-shirt business in college, and after several years as a retailer, wholesaler, and manufacturer, I launched the trade magazine and trade show for the industry. I am considered by many to be the father of the multi-billion dollar “imprinted sportswear industry.” I started other magazines and shows, and sold the company and “retired” at a young age.
My retirement didn’t last long. I have owned and/or operated many magazines and trade shows, travel businesses, retail stores, manufacturing companies, printing company, typesetting business, advertising agency, marketing companies, convention services businesses, souvenir and gift businesses, tourist attractions, resort businesses, music businesses, computer software company, a consulting company, a food franchise, internet businesses, and more. I have written numerous articles, books, training programs, and manuals. I have spoken at conferences and trade shows across North America and in Europe, Australia, and China.
From 1992 to 1996, I was President of Advanstar Expositions, a company owned at the time by Goldman Sachs. Advanstar was one of the largest producers of trade shows and conferences in the world. From 1996 to 2001, I was CEO of 1st Communications, a company owned by Bain Capital, Triumph Capital Group, and me. 1st Communications made a series of multi-million dollar acquisitions to build one of the largest trade show businesses — the largest in terms of the number of annual events. 1st Communications also developed one of the first online job and resume businesses using a network of over 1,000 websites. That business was sold to The Washington Post in 2001, and I “retired” to Atlanta, Georgia.
I discovered corruption in the federal courts in Atlanta, Georgia, and I will not stop until these judges are exposed for the world to see. People will tell you that I’m as tenacious as they come. I will spend the rest of my life on this if necessary.
I’m not an attorney. I was accepted to law school but decided to go into business instead. Since 2006, I’ve gotten quite a legal education. At this point, I’m confident that I can do a better job than any attorney would, and I work cheap.
I come from a media family. My father was one of the pioneers of the television industry. He was the President of the ABC Television station in Orlando for the last 15 years of his career. My brother was a TV news anchorman and trainer of news, weather, and sportscasters. I was a radio and TV announcer in high school and college.
I started several companies in college. I was accepted to law school. Thank Heavens I went into business instead.
I was a magazine publishing company owner / publisher for 30 years. I’ve been the publisher, President, or Vice-President of over 100 magazines. I have also been a trade show / conference producer for 30 years. I’ve been a speaker at conferences all around the world. I’ve lectured at major universities. I’m the author of hundreds of magazine articles, books, manuals, conference programs.
I’m an expert in SWOT Analysis — Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats. I’ve written hundreds of business plans for small start-ups to multi-billion dollar businesses. I’ve built internet sites that generate over 1,600,000 users per month.
From 2008 to 2010, I led a successful effort to clean up corruption in Ontario Canada. Current
- Chief Activist at Lawless America
- CEO at The Windsor Companies
Past
- CEO at 1st Communications
- CEO at Professional Trade Shows
- President at Advanstar Expositions
- President at The Windsor Companies
Education
- Texas Tech University
- University of Kentucky
- The University of Texas at Austin
Linked In Public Profile
http://www.linkedin.com/in/williammichaelwindsor
Summary
Serial entrepreneur. I’ve started over 50 companies since I was a junior at Texas Tech University. It’s what I do. I guess my goal is to just keep doing it. I don’t believe I will ever truly “retire.”
Specialties
Breathing life into new ideas, generating ideas, marketing, management, training, sales training, building management teams, acquisitions, divestitures.
Experience
Chief Activist
Lawless America
August 2005 – Present – Sioux Falls, South Dakota
LawlessAmerica.com began as the story of William M. Windsor’s personal experience with judicial corruption and government corruption. Due to publicity about his efforts with the United States Supreme Court, thousands of people began telling Bill their stories, and this site morphed into a site dedicated to exposing dishonesty and corruption in government while presenting ways to battle this epidemic.
CEO
The Windsor Companies
April 2001 – 2012
After I “retired” for the second time in 2001, I dedicated time to raising money for a project at Texas Tech University; founded a donut franchise; traveled to all 50 states by car writing a book and taking photographs; operated a music business; and started several travel businesses.
CEO
1st Communications
July 1996 – March 2001
From 1996 to 2001, I was CEO of 1st Communications, a company owned by Bain Capital, Triumph Capital Group, and me. 1st Communications made a series of acquisitions to build one of the largest trade show businesses — the largest in terms of the number of annual events. 1st Communications also developed one of the first online job and resume businesses using a network of over 1,000 websites. That business was sold to The Washington Post in 2001, and I “retired” to Atlanta, Georgia to be near grandchildren-to-be.
CEO
Professional Trade Shows
1996 – 2001
President
Advanstar Expositions
Privately Held; 501-1000 employees; Publishing industry
July 1992 – July 1996
From 1992 to 1996, I was President of Advanstar Expositions, a company owned at the time by Goldman Sachs. Advanstar was one of the largest producers of trade shows and conferences in the world.
President
The Windsor Companies
College – August 1992
I began my career as a junior at Texas Tech University. I’ve started over 50 companies in my business career. I became involved in the T-shirt business in college, and after several years as a retailer, wholesaler, and manufacturer, I launched the trade magazine and trade show for the industry. I started other magazines and shows, sold the company and “retired” at a young age. I have owned and/or operated many magazines and trade shows, travel businesses, retail stores, manufacturing companies, printing company, typesetting business, advertising agency, marketing companies, convention services businesses, souvenir and gift businesses, tourist attractions, resort businesses, music businesses, computer software company, a consulting company, a food franchise, internet businesses, and more. I’ve written numerous articles, books, training programs, and manuals. I’ve spoken at conferences and trade shows across North America and in Europe, Australia, and China.
Education
Texas Tech University
BBA, Marketing
I worked full-time during college. My first two years I worked as an announcer at radio and television stations. I had a television talk show in the summer before my senior year on the ABC station in Orlando, Florida. The last two years were spent owning and operating a T-shirt and gift business, a bail bond service for students, and a retail store selling a variety of student-oriented products. I was also the Texas representative for College Marketing Research – responsible for obtaining over 10,000 credit card applications for Humble Oil, conducting campus surveys for magazines, and more. I was accepted to law school but decided I enjoyed making money too much to spend two years studying night and day.
Activities and Societies: Student Senator (2 years), Delta Tau Delta Fraternity (President), Interfraternity Council (Vice-President), Alpha Epsilon Rho, Intramural Athletics, Speech and Debate Team, Faculty-Student Discipline Committee, Who’s Who in American Colleges and Universities, All-University Recognition for Leadership.
University of Kentucky
Business
I attended summer school.
Activities and Societies: I worked at the campus radio stations.
The University of Texas at Austin
Radio-TV-Film
I didn’t feel comfortable at the University of Texas. I had a lot of bad dates, and I wasn’t comfortable with all the hippies. When my parents moved from Lubbock, I seized the opportunity to leave Austin and get back to Lubbock and Texas Tech.
Activities and Societies: I pledged Sigma Phi Epsilon fraternity, and I was involved in student government activities.
Additional Information
Websites:
Twitter:
Interests:
Travel, photography, writing, helping others, exposing corruption
Groups and Associations:
- Media Professionals
- Government Corruption
- Media Professionals Worldwide
- Texas Tech Alumni
- Texas Tech Alumni Association Networking Group
- Texas Tech Group
- Texas Tech University – Students and Alumni
- Texas Tech University Graduates
- Texas Tech University Networking Group
- Texas Tech University Rawls College of Business Alumni
- Travel, Destination and Tourism Photography
Personal Information
Address:
windsorinsouthdakota@yahoo.com
Marital status: Single
#BillWindsor
#WilliamMWindsor
#LawlessAmerica
My Story
My story is the discovery that our legal system is broken.
I always knew there were problems, but I thought it was just dishonest lawyers. I never dreamed that federal judges are corrupt and routinely commit crimes because they have the power to do anything they want.
The following is from a Petition for Writ of Mandamus filed by me with the United States Supreme Court, and I have inserted some additional information from various affidavits and court filings to tell My Story:
In August 2005, Maid of the Mist Corporation and Maid of the Mist Steamboat Company, Ltd. (jointly “Maid”) filed a civil action against Alcatraz Media, LLC, Alcatraz Media, Inc. (jointly “Alcatraz”) and William M. Windsor (“Windsor” or the “Petitioner”) (Alcatraz and Windsor jointly “A&W.”) The action was filed in Gwinnett County Georgia Court. It was removed to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia in March 2006 as Civil Action No. 1:06-CV-0714-ODE (“MIST-1”). The action was originally assigned to Judge Forrester, but he recused himself, and the case was assigned to Judge Orinda D. Evans (“Judge Evans.”) [1] Neither Alcatraz nor I knew Judge Forrester, and neither of us had ever had any dealings of any type with him. It seems he recused himself due to some relationship with Maid of the Mist or their attorneys.
We need to go back a few months for all of this to make sense. On March 3, 2005, Maid of the Mist entered into an oral agreement with Alcatraz to allow Alcatraz to purchase tickets for the boat ride at Niagara Falls from Maid at a discounted rate for the entire 2005 season (April to October). The terms of the oral contract were specific. The period for the oral contract was less than a year, so it was a binding oral contract under Georgia law.
Sandra Carlson of Maid of the Mist entered into the contract with Alcatraz. I was visiting Alcatraz’s office that day when one of the salespeople needed some tickets for a group to ride the Maid of the Mist. I knew that the business development person handling the dealings with Maid of the Mist was unavailable as her mother had just had a stroke. So, while I didn’t work for Alcatraz, I’ll do anything to help my son, so I picked up the phone and called Sandra Carlson at Maid of the Mist. She entered into the contract with me for Alcatraz to buy tickets for the entire 2005 season. The discussion was very specific because I could see from the file that Carlson had been a flake to deal with. Carlson also made the same agreement with Carolyn Ballard Bazzo (“Bazzo”), who called her while her mother was sleeping in the hospital.
Carlson sent faxes to both Bazzo and me following the telephone conversations of March 3, 2005. Maid agreed to provide Certificates of Insurance naming Alcatraz as additional insured, and Maid did. Maid agreed to provide information for Alcatraz to use on its web sites, and they did. Alcatraz agreed to submit a voucher (E-Ticket) for Maid’s approval, and Alcatraz did. Maid approved the voucher. The approval of the voucher was the final obligation agreed to when the contract was entered into on March 3, 2005. It still took a long time and a lot of hassles to get the information needed from Sandra Carlson, but it finally was resolved in early April.
Alcatraz advertised for Maid of the Mist boat tours at Alcatraz’s website www.niagarafallstours.net. Alcatraz advertised for various tours in the Niagara Falls area, as well as for tours in Canada, New York and in others cities in the Northeast. This website did not represent that it was sponsored by Maid. Rather, it expressly represented that it was run by Alcatraz. Alcatraz has also used additional websites to promote its 74 different Niagara Falls tours and activities and its 17 tours that include a Maid of the Mist ticket.
Alcatraz began generating excellent sales for Maid of the Mist in March 2005.
Alcatraz honored all of the terms of the oral contract with Maid. Maid breached the contract in a number of ways. Maid refused service to some Alcatraz customers who had valid E-Tickets. Initially, this was probably because no one at Maid bothered to advise the ticket takers that Alcatraz was issuing valid E-Tickets. Maid informed some Alcatraz customers that they should purchase their tickets directly from Maid at a lower price and file chargebacks against Alcatraz to get their money back from Alcatraz. Not cool. Maid charged Alcatraz for some customers who did not receive the boat ride. Maid failed to give Alcatraz certain discounts that had been promised.
For reasons unknown at the time, Maid created false stories in an attempt to damage Alcatraz and manufacture a claim with which to breach the contract with Alcatraz. Upon information and belief, this was because Maid was in breach of contract with the Niagara Parks Commission (“NPC”) and the New York State Office of Parks, Recreation, and Historic Preservation (“OPRHP”).
Carlson and Schul sent letters, faxes, and emails for Maid to Alcatraz that contained false claims. Glynn, Schul, and Carlson made false claims by telephone. Carlson sent letters on June 14 and July 19, 2005 that contained false claims of problems caused by Alcatraz. The July 19, 2005 letter asked for Alcatraz to make changes to its E-Ticket. Alcatraz made changes to the E-Ticket. Carlson then sent an email claiming the July 19 letter asked for changes to the web site, but the letter said no such thing. Schul then sent a letter and emails that contained false claims of problems caused by Alcatraz. On July 29, 2005, Maid breached the contract with Alcatraz by declaring the contract to be terminated. But the oral contract was for the entire 2005 season, and Maid of the Mist did not have the right to terminate it until it expired in mid October 2005.
It was all totally bizarre. It made no sense at the time. Alcatraz tried repeatedly for a month to get Maid or Maid’s Attorneys to speak with Alcatraz about the problem, but they refused. My son asked me to handle the legal stuff for him, so I am the one who tried to get them to respond.
Despite Maid’s written promise to Alcatraz on July 29, 2005 that Maid would honor tickets purchased prior to July 29, 2005, Maid subsequently refused to honor some Alcatraz tickets purchased prior to that date. Not surprising. Maid refused to honor these tickets despite the fact that Alcatraz had provided Maid with over $10,000 in prepayments, a written payment guarantee, and credit card authorization to charge any tickets purchased for the 2005 season, thus guaranteeing Maid that it would be paid for any Alcatraz customer who showed up with a voucher. It was the first week in August 2005 when Maid of the Mist began refusing service to Alcatraz customers.
Maid of the Mist began defaming Alcatraz and telling Alcatraz’s customers that Alcatraz was an Internet Scam. (Alcatraz had been in business for 11 years and was the largest company in the world selling tickets and tours as Maid of the Mist knew quite well.) In August, September, and October 2005, Maid refused to honor vouchers for more than eight hundred (800) Alcatraz customers.
Alcatraz issued refunds to customers who placed orders that it believed would not be honored and to customers who contacted Alcatraz who claimed that Maid refused to honor the Alcatraz vouchers. Every customer was refunded by Alcatraz. Maid sold tickets to Alcatraz’s customers directly and generated a greater income as a result.
I am the father of the 75% owner of Alcatraz. I have never been an officer, director, shareholder, owner, investor, or employee of Alcatraz, but I stepped in to handle the legal problem on behalf of Alcatraz. This is important because Maid of the Mist might have had a basis to sue me if I was involved in the company in one of those manners, but I wasn’t. For the first three years of Ryan’s company, I was CEO of a large company in Ohio. Ryan started and built Alcatraz all on his own.
I placed five phone calls, sent five faxes, and sent approximately 20 emails from July 28, 2005 until August 28, 2005 in an attempt to get someone from Maid or a Maid attorney to speak with me about the problem. No one from Maid of the Mist and no Maid attorney ever spoke to Alcatraz or me until after the lawsuit was filed on August 29, 2005.
Since it appeared that Maid of the Mist was hell bent on breaching the contract and screwing my baby boy’s company, I called the Niagara Parks Commission (“NPC”) to see if we could go into competition with Maid of the Mist. I was turned away, but the NPC told Maid of the Mist about my call. Less than three weeks later, we were sued.
It was August 25, 2005 when Christopher Glynn (“Glynn”), President of Maid of the Mist signed a sworn affidavit to be used with the filing of the lawsuit [MIST-1 Docket #1.] 46 of the 50 paragraphs were false or incorrect. Proof to show that as many as 46 of the statements are false is set out on pages 364 to 553 of Dec #25 (MIST-1 Docket #462).
Glynn swore that his statements were his personal knowledge, but that was false. Personal knowledge means the information is known from direct experience rather than hearing about it from someone else or making it up. Glynn swore that everything in his affidavit was true and correct, but that was false. In deposition testimony, Maid Marketing VP Timothy P. Ruddy testified that some of the statements in Glynn’s August 25, 2005 affidavit were not true. In his deposition testimony, Controller Robert J. Schul testified that some of the statements in Glynn’s August 25, 2005 affidavit were not true. Alcatraz, Bazzo, and I testified in depositions that statements in Glynn’s affidavit were not true at all, and we had a lot of proof in emails and letters.
The drafting of this affidavit by Mr. Carl Hugo Anderson, Mr. Marc W. Brown, and Mr. Arthur P. Russ, while under oath as officers of the court as members of the Bar, was improper, and statements in the affidavit were known to be false by the attorneys.
When Maid sued, they sued Alcatraz and me personally. The lawsuit falsely and maliciously claimed that I operated my own business and did all types of things including theft and bribery. Maid and Maid attorneys knew this was false. Ruddy testified that I should not have been included in many of the sworn paragraphs in Glynn’s affidavit and verification. Maid never produced any evidence to prove that Maid had any valid legal claim against me for anything.
When I became involved in all of this, I was very naïve. I felt that the judicial system was fair and honest, so I was confident that the courts would vindicate us and put Christopher Glynn in jail for perjury for a long, long time. (Five years later, I knew that our federal court system is totally corrupt. I am not an attorney, but I had spent over 7,000 hours studying the law, so I know more about the legal issues in this case than most attorneys.)
On behalf of Alcatraz and myself, I filed a sworn response to Maid’s lawsuit stating under oath under penalty of perjury that everything Glynn had said was false.
Nothing much happened in the fall of 2005, but in March 2006 after we subpoenaed Glynn for a deposition, Maid of the Mist filed a motion with the court seeking a temporary restraining order. That was when Judge Orinda D. Evans was assigned to the case. She read the two affidavits that were totally contradictory about the facts, and she granted the TRO to Maid. Our attorney and I were shocked.
When a party to a lawsuit gets a TRO, they have to post a bond to cover the other party’s costs in the lawsuit if they lose. We asked for $250,000. Judge Evans only required $5,000. It should have been over $1.5 million as it turns out. Awarding such a ridiculously low bond was another strong signal of the bias of Judge Evans (something that judges are sworn not to have).
At first, I suspected that Judge Evans had an incompetent young law clerk who was making a mess of this. I thought the judge just wasn’t paying attention. It didn’t take long for me to discover that Judge Evans was simply a bad judge. Then it didn’t take me long after that to begin organizing the proof that she was a dishonest, corrupt judge.
Every order that Judge Evans issued was against us. Out of 40 contested motions, it was 40 for Maid of the Mist and zero for Alcatraz and me. This was all due to the dishonesty of Judge Orinda D. Evans.
During the discovery period, we took depositions and obtained documents. Our goal in all of this was to prove in THEIR WORDS that the verified complaint was totally false. We succeeded.
In February 2007, Judge Orinda D. Evans gave us a short meeting in her chambers. I informed her that we had documented proof of over 400 counts of perjury and that we had proven that the verified complaint was totally false. She refused to allow it to be discussed.
At this point, I felt for sure that she was corrupt. But then she said a few things that caused our attorney and me to think we had won the case. But as she had done many times before, she reversed herself or “forgot” those things later. Any time we though we prevailed on something, she ignored that and turned whatever it was against us.
Shortly after the February 7, 2007 meeting, Maid of the Mist filed two contracts under seal for an in camera inspection (review by only her). These were their contracts with the governments of Ontario and New York State. We felt for sure that they would have vital information for our defense. Judge Evans reviewed them and said they would not be provided to us. That is supposed to mean they were not relevant to the case.
All types of dishonesty by Maid of the Mist, their attorneys, and Judge Orinda D. Evans took place from 2005 to now. It would just take way too long to recount it all. But rest assured that I have it all documented.
The next big development was motions for summary judgment. This is a legal procedure where a judge can end a case without a jury if it is so clearly one-sided. If there is a “fact issue,” an important issue in the case that is disputed, there cannot be a summary judgment. EVERYTHING was disputed in this case, so a summary judgment was impossible.
But you’ve already figured out what happened. Judge Evans granted the summary judgment for Maid of the Mist and ordered Alcatraz and me to pay over $400,000 in Maid of the Mist’s legal fees. To say that I was shocked was an understatement. I read the order, and it was one false statement and lie after another. The documents filed with the court proved her order was totally false.
Judge Evans granted the summary judgment to Maid on a legal cause of action called “tortious interference” with alleged damages of less than $100, though (1) A&W provided sworn affidavits from the four customers involved who allegedly did not spend $100, and each swore that they did buy tickets from Maid, so there were no damages, and (2) the only sworn testimony before the court was that there was an oral contract breached by Maid, and thus there was no tortious interference by Alcatraz. Damages are a requirement for tortious interference, so the fact that there were no damages was critical. We proved that with affidavits from the people Maid claimed created the damages.
Alcatraz and I swore under oath at all times that Maid made up all of the sworn claims in the Verified Complaint and motion for injunctive relief in MIST-1. Judge Evans refused to even consider A&W’s charges of perjury, false sworn pleadings, and Rule 11 violations by Maid and Maid’s attorneys. I documented all the lies with citations to the record.
We appealed the summary judgment order to the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. Naïve me thought we would finally get this overtured and headed in the right direction. But three judges rubber-stamped Judge Evans’ order. They TOTALLY ignored every error of law and fact raised by our attorneys. I was flabbergasted. I was literally sick for several weeks from it. I worked closely with the attorneys and researched all of the appeal issues, so I knew the Eleventh Circuit had to overturn Judge Evans. When I was able to think straight, I figured they supported their friend, Judge Evans, to protect her from indictment, conviction, and impeachment.
So, on to The Supreme Court, I thought. Our attorneys then educated me that The Supreme Court is no longer a court of appeals. They don’t review actions of the appellate courts. They decide if a case is interesting enough to them. The odds of that in 2009 were 1 out of 100. We were told it could cost us another $250,000 in legal fees if we went on, and we might be held responsible for Maid of the Mist’s legal fees since that had happened to us before. That would mean $500,000 or more. So, through clenched teeth, we reached an out-of-court settlement with Maid in December 2008 to stop the outrageous legal expense in MIST-1. Alcatraz and I refused to provide and did not provide general releases to Maid or Maid’s Attorneys. We refused to provide releases because I was determined to go after them again.
I tried and tried to find an attorney to represent me, but no attorney was willing to sue a judge. They felt the federal judges would ruin them if they did.
So, in April 2009, I began efforts (representing myself) to reopen the case pursuant to FRCP Rule 60(b) primarily due to fraud upon the courts. A major factor was the discovery of new evidence that had been concealed from us by Maid and Judge Evans.[2] I obtained copies of the two contracts that Maid had been ordered to file under seal with Judge Evans. As soon as I looked at them, I knew that they were vital to our case. After obtaining some additional information through Freedom of Information Act requests, I felt sure that Maid of the Mist had filed bogus documents with Judge Evans. So, my task was simple; get the court to produce those documents, and we would get the case reopened and win. The bad guys would go to prison, and the Windsors would live happily ever after.
Surprise, surprise, Judge Evans refused. She began issuing perjury-filled orders. I knew now that she was as corrupt as a judge could possible be. The only reason to keep the documents hidden was to hide the fact that she had committed perjury and obstruction of justice…and to protect Maid of the Mist from losing the lawsuit and having its key managers all found guilty of hundreds of counts of perjury.
(One of the attorneys who refused to represent me out of fear of the judges gave me some advice. He told me to appeal early and often, so I did. As a result, I now have dozens of orders from Judge Evans, Judge Duffey, and the Eleventh Circuit. This gives me dozens and dozens and dozens of documents that establish the dishonesty and corruption.)
Not to be blocked without a fight after Judge Evans tried to block my efforts, I subpoenaed Judge Evans! This probably doesn’t happen very often. Then some truly bizarre things happened. Judge Evans filed a motion in her own court in my case. Judges can’t do that, but she did. She hired the United States Attorney’s Office (the same people who are supposed to go after corrupt judges). On June 3, 2009, the U.S. Attorney representing Judge Evans filed a motion to quash a subpoena for the deposition in MIST-1. [Pet.App.171 — Mandamus Affidavit #1 — “M-Aff #1”, ¶39.] [3] [Deposition Action Doc. 1.] [4] The motion was referred to Judge William S. Duffey (“Judge Duffey”), and this created Civil Action 1:09-CV-01543-WSD (the “Deposition Action”).[5]
Judge Duffey had never had any dealings with me prior to the referral of the motion to quash. I had never heard the name “Judge William S. Duffey” either. There was no conference held, and there was no hearing held, despite my motions requesting both.[6] On June 8, 2009, Judge Duffey stayed the properly subpoenaed deposition.[7] Judge Duffey made a number of incorrect statements in the stay order dated June 8, 2009.[8] The order was totally pro-Judge Evans, and it indicated that Judge Duffey may be biased.[9]
On June 10, 2009, the U.S. Attorney supplemented Judge Evans’ motion to quash.[10] On June 18, 2009, I filed a Motion for Reconsideration of the Order Staying Case and the Twenty-Ninth Declaration of William M. Windsor (Dec #29).[11] [12] This was filed to note errors in Judge Duffey’s order.[13] On June 30, 2009, an Order to Quash the Deposition of Judge Evans was issued by Judge Duffey.[16] [17] The order described me as “scurrilous and irresponsible.” The legal definition of scurrilous is “evil.” The legal definition of irresponsible is “mentally or financially incapable.” I am neither scurrilous nor irresponsible!
This was written by a man who did not know me, had never even seen me, and who made such a statement and decision based solely on my three uncontroverted sworn affidavits. In 2009, there were zero (0) affidavits filed by Maid in MIST-1, the Deposition Action, or MIST-2. So, my testimony and evidence stood alone as the record before the court.[18]
The only explanation for this slander is that Judge Duffey was predisposed to bias against me because I had the audacity to try to depose Judge Evans to obtain information that was available only from Judge Evans that I desperately needed to reopen the case in MIST-1.[19] There is nothing scurrilous and irresponsible in the three affidavits that Judge Duffey had before him when he entered the June 30, 2009 order — Dec #29, Dec #35, and Dec #34. The statements made therein are no different than the statements made herein. Judge Evans made as many as 200 false statements in two orders in MIST-1. She knew statements that she made in her orders were false. She obstructed justice by concealing documents from me. These are facts, proven with evidence that I filed in each of the three civil actions.
On July 27, 2009, I filed Civil Action No. 1:09-CV-02027-WSD (“MIST-2″), an independent action in equity for fraud upon the court and RICO.[20] On July 28, 2009, when I was told by the District Court Clerk’s Office that Judge Duffey (the judge who called me “scurrilous and irresponsible”) would be presiding in MIST-2, I immediately went home and prepared a Motion to Recuse Judge Duffey and a Motion for Change of Venue. I returned later in the day and filed.[21]
On July 30, 2009, a TRO Hearing was held. Judge Duffey denied the motion.[22] Judge Duffey distributed an order on my motions regarding service of process on Canadian defendants, representation, motion to change venue, and motion to recuse. All were denied.[23] Judge Duffey was antagonistic and biased in the hearing. Details of this are provided in the Transcript of the Temporary Restraining Order Hearing.[24] False statements in the July 30, 2009 order are listed in the Affidavit of Prejudice.[25]
On August 4, 2009, I filed an Emergency Motion to Recuse Judge Duffey. I advised Judge Duffey that I would seek a Writ of Mandamus if there was not a prompt response. This motion appears on the MIST-2 Docket as a “Motion for Leave†because Judge Duffey ordered that I must first submit proposed motions to him with a request for approval to file.[26] This motion was pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §144. The filing included an Affidavit of Prejudice[27] and a 28 U.S.C.§144 Certificate of Good Faith.[28]
On August 10, 2009, I filed a Petition for a Writ of Mandamus with the Eleventh Circuit seeking to have Judge Duffey disqualified.[29] The Affidavit of Prejudice[30] and a 28 U.S.C.§144 Certificate of Good Faith[31] were included as exhibits. On September 17, 2009, the Eleventh Circuit denied the Petition for a Writ of Mandamus.[33]
At some point during all this, I took my first petition for writ of certiorari (appeal) to The Supreme Court. The Supreme Court decided it was “not worthy” of their consideration. I spelled out the fraud and corruption for them, but they ignored it.
Like the Energizer Bunny, I just kept going. Every order issued by Judge Evans and Judge Duffey was not valid based upon the facts or the law. They were totally corrupt. The judges didn’t make mistakes. They were intentionally committing crimes to try to stop me.
I reported all of this to the United States Attorney (same one who represents Judge Evans), the FBI, the Justice Department, every member of the House and Senate Judiciary Committees, and many others. No one would do anything! They completely ignored me.
So, I sued them. I prepared everything and flew to Washington, DC to file there as I thought I would find honest judges in the shadow of The Capitol and The Supreme Court. I ran right smack dab into Judge Richard J. Leon. He proved to be just as corrupt. He dismissed my case on bogus grounds and did a lot of nasty stuff to me. At this point, I started to realize that the corruption in our federal courts may be everywhere. I don’t know that yet, but from the reports I have gotten from people all over the country, I suspect it is true. We have a Constitutional Crisis on our hands. The federal judges have hijacked the Constitution, and they are holding us all hostage.
I continued my efforts in Judge Evans’ court and Judge Duffey’s court, and they lied and cheated me every step of the way. I appealed just about everything to the Eleventh Circuit, and they lied and cheated me every step of the way. In fact, in 62 pages of orders (perhaps 25 orders) from the Eleventh Circuit, they never ever, even once, addressed ANY of my points or error or law. They ignored the facts and what the law actually provides and ruled against me in one sentence orders much of the time.
The abuse has escalated. Judge Evans found me in contempt of court. She warned me that “You are playing with fire.” She threatened to put me in jail. She fined me. She hit me with more legal fees. Lying every step of the way. Violating the law again and again and again. Same for Dishonest Duffey. He’s just as bad — maybe worse — a real snake. Most of his lies are proven with documents that he pretends do not exist.
Judge Duffey and Judge Evans have taken the unbelievable corrupt acts to a new level. They have the Clerk of the Court doing all types of things. My filings magically disappear. I presented a new lawsuit to be filed, and they refuse to file it. There is no legal right whatsoever for them to do this. but there is nowhere to turn. I will try filing in Washington, DC again, but that is probably a waste of time.
At this point, I had two appeals pending in Washington DC, a dozen at the Eleventh Circuit, and one at The Supreme Court. During a conversation with a clerk at The Supreme Court, I learned by accident that one can file a petition for writ of mandamus with The Supreme Court. This is not an appeal, so it isn’t something that they can ignore. They have to render a decision on it. So I filed three. One each to disqualify Judge Orinda D. Evans, Judge William S. Duffey, and one for the seven corrupt judges who I have identified at the Eleventh Circuit. The Supreme Court has given the accused judges until December 15 to file responses.
This should be a landmark decision. I have asked The Supreme Court whether they will stop federal judges from voiding the Constitution. I have asked them whether they will expose the corruption in the federal courts. I have asked them whether federal judges may continue to ignore the facts, ignore the law, and violate the Constitutional rights of the people who appear as parties in their courts. I prayed that they would have the guts to blow the corruption wide open, but they are all products of the same corrupt system, so I am shocked but not surprised that the Supreme Court issued three rulings on January 18, 2011 that allow federal judges to continue to violate the Constitution, treat it as if it doesn’t exist, and ignore the law and the facts. My best chance is if this story gets out to enough people that we get public pressure building to have someone somewhere do something.
Judges are supposed to tell the truth at all times, but these judges have made false statements routinely. These were material false statements made under the judges’ oath of office in a federal proceeding. These judges knew statements that they made were false.
Judges are supposed to provide due process to the parties in their courts, but I have had just about every form of due process denied. I have not been allowed to present evidence, call witnesses, cross examine witnesses, have an impartial judge, and much more.
These judges routinely ignored the facts and the law and even invented their own facts.[43] These judges have made rulings that are absolutely contrary to the law. Judge Evans even denied us any ability to obtain the names of witnesses that we needed to depose. She granted a summary judgment for Maid on the key issue in the case — an oral agreement for six months in 2005 — based upon the following: Maid testified that its president was not aware of an agreement with Alcatraz. There was no other testimony from Maid other than this one statement in the Verified Complaint! Alcatraz provided a Verified Answer, multiple sworn affidavits, and extensive deposition testimony detailing the exact terms of the oral agreement from the people who made the oral agreement with Maid. This clearly created at least a fact issue that defeated summary judgment, but Judge Evans invented facts that weren’t true and weren’t in the record, ignored the truth, and claimed her facts trumped the A&W’s sworn testimony. As there was a contract, there was no tortious interference, but there was breach of contract by Maid, and A&W should have won the case.[44]
Detailed background facts regarding the judicial misconduct of these judges is provided in the three petitions for writ of mandamus:
Judges of the Eleventh Circuit
Katherine Albrecht asked me on her radio show why I have kept going. My friends and relatives will tell you that I am the most tenacious person they have ever known. I will not stop. I will get these judges indicted, convicted, and impeached, or I will die trying. They “stole” from my child. I’ll fight back against anyone who messes with me wrongfully, but you mess with one of my children or grandchildren, and you’ve declared war against me.
I obviously have a personal stake in all of this. Most people who pursue a cause do, but now, I have met and spoken with so many people who have been cheated by corrupt judges that I feel I have a big responsibility to them as well. I will fight for everyone.
My son said, “Dad, all of this is well and good, but what is your solution to the problems?” I sat down at the keyboard, and did a brain dump. Here are my ideas to correct the problem of judicial corruption.
I have two grandchildren – M1 and Pogo. I drove M1’s carpool once a week. She is unbelievably intelligent and worldly for a seven-year-old. As we drove home one day, she told me they were studying Martin Luther King. She asked me to tell her about those times, so I did. She asked me what I did to stop the prejudice and all the problems. I told her that I was never prejudiced, but I didn’t really do anything. She asked if I had ever done anything that made a big difference in the world. I said, no, unfortunately not. She quickly assured me that she would make a difference in the world. I absolutely believe that is true. Well, I hope I can do something vitally important to every American with my efforts to expose corruption in the federal courts. We are all in trouble. M1 and I want to help.
Update – January 2, 2012
The above story only covers until mid-2011. So much more has happened. I stay so busy with all of this that I don’t know when I will have time to update “My Story.” But everything else that I will summarize is in articles that appear on LawlessAmerica.com.
I now know that our courts are hopelessly corrupt.
[1] MIST-1_Doc.1.
[2] MIST-1_Docs.361 and 362.
[3] The Mandamus Affidavit of William M. Windsor is on pages 161-185 in the Appendix (Pet.App.). “M-Aff #” is the abbreviation used for this affidavit herein. “Doc.” is the abbreviation for Docket used herein.
[4] “Pet.App. ###” indicates page number in the Appendix to this Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
[5] Pet.App.171 — M-Aff #1, ¶40.
[6] Pet.App.171 — M-Aff #1, ¶41.
[7] Deposition Action_Doc.4; Pet.App.172 — M-Aff #1, ¶42.
[8] Pet.App.161-170, 190-191, Affidavit of Prejudice ¶¶34-67 and 118-121.
[9] Pet.App.172 — M-Aff #1, ¶43.
[10] Deposition Action_Doc.8; Pet.App.127 — M-Aff #1, ¶45.
[11] Declarations and affidavits of William M. Windsor have been numbered. “Dec #__” is used as the abbreviation for each. Dec #5 is the Fifth, Dec #34 is the Thirty-Fourth, etc.
[12] Deposition Action_Doc.15.
[13] Pet.App.172 — M-Aff #1, ¶47.
[14] Deposition Action_Doc.21; Pet.App.172 — M-Aff #1, ¶49.
[15] Deposition Action_Doc.24; Pet.App.173 — M-Aff #1, ¶50.
[16] Deposition Action_Doc.32.
[17] Pet.App.24.
[18] Pet.App.173 — M-Aff #1, ¶51.
[19] Pet.App.173 — M-Aff#1, ¶51.
[20] Pet.App.173-174, ¶53; MIST-2_Doc.1.
[21] MIST-2_Docs.15 and 17; Pet.App.174 — M-Aff #1, ¶55.
[22] MIST-2_Doc.31.
[23] Pet.App.19; Pet.App.174 — M-Aff #1, ¶56; MIST-2_Doc.22.
[24] MIST-2_Doc.48; Pet.App.174, ¶56.
[25] Pet.App.71-77, ¶¶121-141; Pet.App.174 — M-Aff #1, ¶56.
[26] MIST-2_Doc.36.
[27] Pet.App.161.
[28] Pet.App.114; Pet.App.174-175 — M-Aff #1, ¶57.
[29] Pet.App.116.
[30] Pet.App.161
[31] Pet.App.114.
[32] Mist-2_Doc.1.
[33] Pet.App.4.
[34] Pet.App.186.
[35] Pet.App.3 and 18.
[36] Pet.App.A.
[37] Pet.App.175 — M-Aff #1, ¶59-60.
[38] Pet.App.176 — M-Aff #1, ¶62.
[39] See MIST-1_Doc.474, Pet.App.176 — M-Aff #1, ¶63.
[40] MIST-1_Doc.377, Exhibits 9 and 22; see Pet.App.90-101, ¶¶189-264.
[41] MIST-1_Doc.174, P23: 24-25, P24: 1-7, P34: 4-7, P44: 6-8.
[42] MIST-1_Doc.361.
[43] Pet.App.99, ¶245; Pet.App.178 — M-Aff #1, ¶78.
[44] MIST-2_Doc.1.
[45] MIST-1_Doc.406.
[46] MIST-1_Doc.462.
[47] MIST-2_Doc.1.
[48] Pet.App.85-104, ¶¶172-276.
My name is William Michael Windsor. This is my story, and I’m stickin’ to it. Copyright 2013, William Michael Windsor. See http://LawlessAmerica.com, http://facebook.com/billwindsor1, and http://youtube.com/lawlessamerica.