Jeff Ashton Dismisses Windsor Case

Jeff Ashton Dismisses Case

Bill Windsor‘s PERSONAL INJURY CASE WAS DISMISSED BY JUDGE JEFFREY L. ASHTON ON 4/19/2023 AT 9:20 A.M.

Bill Windsor was not allowed to speak.

Jeff Ashton D-Day

Jeff Ashton Stages D-Day

Jeff Ashton is ready for D-Day (Dismiss Day). The most corrupt judge in Central Florida continues to commit crimes against innocent people.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE

NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND

FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA

WILLIAM WINDSOR, CASE NO. 2018-CA-010270-O

Plaintiff,

ROBERT KEITH LONGEST, an individual, and BOISE CASCADE BUILDING MATERIALS DISTRIBUTION, L.L.C., a Foreign Limited Liability Company,

Defendants.

____________________________________________________________________________

PLAINTIFF’S VERIFIED EMERGENCY MOTION TO STRIKE APRIL 19, 2023 HEARING; MOTION FOR SANCTIONS AGAINST DEFENDANTS AND THEIR ATTORNEYS; MOTION TO STRIKE PLEADINGS OF DEFENDANTS; AND RESPONSE TO MOTION OF DEFENDANTS

COMES NOW, William M. Windsor (“Windsor” or “Plaintiff”), and files Plaintiff’s Verified EMERGENCY MOTION to Strike April 19, 2023 HEARING; Motion for Sanctions against Defendants and their Attorneys; Motion to Strike Pleadings of Defendants; and Response to Motion of Defendants. Windsor shows the Court as follows:

There are many reasons why the April 19, 2023 Hearing must be stricken.
WINDSOR’s life has been destroyed by the accident that brought this case and the intentional infliction of emotional distress aftermath.
The Defendants have lied and lied and lied. Judges have let them get away with it.
The attorneys for the Defendants have committed literally hundreds of violations of the Rules. Judges have let them get away with it.
Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton has demonstrated a variety of ways to violate due process, violate the Code of Judicial Conduct, and violate laws. He has made false statements to damage WINDSOR. [EXHIBIT 2823.] [EXHIBIT 2824.] The Court is asked to take judicial notice of Case No. 6D23-2220 in the District Court of Appeal of the State of Florida Sixth District. All exhibits to EXHIBIT 2823 hereto are filed there. The Court is also asked to take judicial notice of Case No. 6D23-2069 in the District Court of Appeal of the State of Florida Sixth District. All exhibits to EXHIBIT 2824 hereto are filed there.
WINDSOR has never lied, and he has never knowingly violated a law or a rule.
When WINDSOR comes to a stop sign in the middle of nowhere, he comes to a full stop before the sign. He hasn’t had a traffic or parking ticket since September 25, 1995. [EXHIBIT 3001.] He had never been in a traffic accident before 05/05/2017.

A COURT HAS NO JURISDICTION TO ORDER A PARTY IN BANKRUPTCY TO SPEND MONEY THAT HE DOESN’T HAVE OR ISN’T ALLOWED TO USE AS JUDGE JEFFREY l. ASHTON HAS DONE.

As Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton is well aware, WINDSOR is in bankruptcy; the bankruptcy court will not pay for an attorney; WINDSOR cannot afford an attorney because all of his assets except his monthly social security check are in the Bankruptcy Estate; and he has been unable to get an attorney to work for free.
Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton can’t order WINDSOR to violate the federal bankruptcy statutes and a court order.
The Court is asked to take judicial notice of federal bankruptcy statutes and Case # 6-21-bk-04061 in United States Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Florida.

JUDGE JEFFREY L. ASHTON HAS IGNORED EVERYTHING

RELATIVE TO A TRIAL

On 10/21/2022, the Uniform Order Setting this Case for Jury Pre-Trial set the Pre-Trial Conference for April 10, 2023 at 9:00 a.m. [EXHIBIT 3922.] But absolutely nothing has been done regarding the pre-trial by the judge and essentially nothing by the Defendants. [2018-CA-010270-O DOCKET.]

Violation of a Court Order by the Defendants #1

On 10/21/2022, Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton ordered the Defendants to disclose the expert witnesses the Defendants actually intended to testify within 15 days following the Plaintiff’s disclosure. [EXHIBIT 3922, P.2 ¶5(b).] On 01/17/2023, WINDSOR filed his Amended Expert Witness List.
The Defendants failed to file an expert witness list following WINDSOR’s disclosure. This is Violation of a Court Order by the Defendants.

Violation of a Court Order by the Defendants #2

On 03/27/2023, the Defendants were to serve a List of All Witnesses and provide name, address, and telephone number. [EXHIBIT 3922, P.3 ¶6(a).]
The Defendants failed to serve the list as specified. This is Violation of a Court Order by the Defendants.

Violation of a Court Order by the Defendants #3

On 03/27/2023, the Defendants were to serve a schedule of all exhibits, including depositions, a party may offer at trial, lettered sequentially. [EXHIBIT 3922, P.3 ¶6(b).]
The Defendants failed to serve the schedule. This is Violation of a Court Order by the Defendants.

Violation of a Court Order by the Defendants #4

Not later than 03/11/2023, the Defendants were to provide deposition designations. [EXHIBIT 3922, P.3 ¶7(a).]
The Defendants failed to make the designations. This is Violation of a Court Order by the Defendants.

Violation of a Court Order by the Defendants #5

Not later than 03/21/2023, the Defendants were to serve counter or fairness designations. [EXHIBIT 3922, P.3 ¶7(a).]
The Defendants failed to give the Plaintiff his right to serve counter or fairness designations. This is Violation of a Court Order by the Defendants.

Violation of a Court Order by the Defendants #6

Not later than 03/21/2023, the Defendants were to exchange proposed jury instructions and verdict forms. [EXHIBIT 3922, P.3 ¶7(b).]
The Defendants failed to exchange proposed jury instructions and verdict forms. This is Violation of a Court Order by the Defendants.

Violation of a Court Order by the Defendants #7

No later than 03/26/2023, a Face-to-Face Meeting was scheduled to be held, but the Defendants were no-shows. [EXHIBIT 3922, P.3 ¶7(c).]
This is Violation of a Court Order by the Defendants.

Violation of a Court Order by the Defendants #8

No later than 03/26/2023, a discussion face-to-face was to be held to Discuss and attempt to settle the case, but the Defendants were no-shows and made no such attempt. [EXHIBIT 3922, P.3 ¶7(c)(1).]
This is Violation of a Court Order by the Defendants.

Violation of a Court Order by the Defendants #9

No later than 03/26/2023, a discussion face-to-face was to be held for the Defendants to produce all documents to be offered at trial. Exhibits had to be Bates stamped.
WINDSOR prepared his documents, but the Defendants were no-shows and made no such attempt. [EXHIBIT 3922, P.3 ¶7(c)(2).]
This is Violation of a Court Order by the Defendants.

Violation of a Court Order by the Defendants #10

No later than 03/26/2023, a discussion face-to-face was to be held to “examine, and initial every exhibit to be produced by the opposing side(s) at trial. The Parties shall agree on those exhibits which will be admitted as joint exhibits and those which can be admitted without objection.”
WINDSOR prepared his documents and was ready, but the Defendants were no-shows and made no such attempt. [EXHIBIT 3922, P.3 ¶7(c)(3).]
This is Violation of a Court Order by the Defendants.

Violation of a Court Order by the Defendants #11

No later than 03/26/2023, a discussion face-to-face was to be held where the parties shall then identify all other exhibits and specify any objections thereto. “Exhibit Schedules” shall then be prepared reflecting these separate categories of exhibits for each Party. The Exhibit Schedules for each party shall be attached to the Joint Pre-Trial Statement described below. OBJECTIONS NOT NOTED ARE WAIVED. [EXHIBIT 3922, P.3-4, ¶7(c)(3).]
WINDSOR prepared his documents and was ready, but the Defendants were no-shows and made no such attempt. [EXHIBIT 3922, P.3 ¶7(c)(3).]
This is Violation of a Court Order by the Defendants.

Violation of a Court Order by the Defendants #12

No later than 03/26/2023, a discussion face-to-face was to be held to review opposing parties’ witness lists. “Witness lists for each Party shall be attached to the Joint Pre-Trial Statement….” [EXHIBIT 3922, P.4 ¶7(c)(4).]
WINDSOR prepared his lists and was ready, but the Defendants were no-shows and made no such attempt.
This is Violation of a Court Order by the Defendants.

Violation of a Court Order by the Defendants #13

No later than 03/26/2023, a discussion face-to-face was to be held to discuss and stipulate to any facts requiring no proof at trial. [EXHIBIT 3922, P.4 ¶7(c)(5).]
WINDSOR was prepared and ready, but the Defendants were no-shows and made no such attempt.
This is Violation of a Court Order by the Defendants.

Violation of a Court Order by the Defendants #14

No later than 03/26/2023, a discussion face-to-face was to be held to discuss, clarify and frame all factual issues of fact to be tried. [EXHIBIT 3922, P.4 ¶7(c)(6).]
WINDSOR was prepared and ready, but the Defendants were no-shows and made no such attempt.
This is Violation of a Court Order by the Defendants.

Violation of a Court Order by the Defendants #15

No later than 03/26/2023, a discussion face-to-face was to be held to identify all legal, procedural or evidentiary issues to be decided prior to or during trial. [EXHIBIT 3922, P.4 ¶7(c)(7).]
WINDSOR was prepared and ready, but the Defendants were no-shows and made no such attempt.
This is Violation of a Court Order by the Defendants.

Violation of a Court Order by the Defendants #16

No later than 03/26/2023, a discussion face-to-face was to be held to discuss any evidentiary stipulations. [EXHIBIT 3922, P.3 ¶7(c)(8).]
WINDSOR was prepared and ready, but the Defendants were no-shows and made no such attempt.
This is Violation of a Court Order by the Defendants.

Violation of a Court Order by the Defendants #17

No later than 03/26/2023, a discussion face-to-face was to be held to agree upon and draft a concise statement of the case to be read by the Court at of voir dire. [EXHIBIT 3922, P.3 ¶7(c)(9).]
WINDSOR was prepared and ready, but the Defendants were no-shows and made no such attempt.
This is Violation of a Court Order by the Defendants.

Violation of a Court Order by the Defendants #18

No later than 03/26/2023, a discussion face-to-face was to be held to discuss the proposed jury instructions (voir dire through closing) and verdict forms. Discuss whether the Court will instruct the jury on the law prior to opening statements and, if so, which jury instructions are to be read at that time. [EXHIBIT 3922, P.4 ¶ 7(c)10.]
The parties shall prepare the following:
All Agreed Jury Instructions, including Supreme Court instructions for, if applicable, voir dire, instructions prior to opening, instructions prior to closing argument and instruction(s) following closing arguments [EXHIBIT 3922, P.4 ¶ 7 (c)10(i).]
(ii.) All disputed instructions identifying the Party proposing it/them and the phase of the Trial for which the instruction is proposed. [EXHIBIT 3922, P.4 ¶ 7 (c)10(ii).]
(iii.) The above versions of Jury Instructions shall be prepared to include a cover page reflecting the style of the case, an appropriate title, with instructions following in paragraph form without Jury Instruction numbers, headers or brackets. Instructions shall be 14-point, Times New Roman and double spaced. Pages shall be numbered. [EXHIBIT 3922, P.4 ¶ 7 (c)10(iii).]
WINDSOR was prepared and ready, but the Defendants were no-shows and made no such attempt.
This is Violation of a Court Order by the Defendants.

Violation of a Court Order by the Defendants #19

No later than 03/26/2023, a discussion face-to-face was to be held to discuss and attempt to agree upon any other matters leading to a more orderly and expeditious trial. [EXHIBIT 3922, P.5 ¶ 7 (c)11.]
WINDSOR was prepared and ready, but the Defendants were no-shows and made no such attempt.
This is Violation of a Court Order by the Defendants.

Violation of a Court Order by the Defendants #20

No later than 03/26/2023, a discussion face-to-face was to be held to discuss and exchange all demonstrative aids. [EXHIBIT 3922, P.5 ¶ 7 (c)12.]
WINDSOR was prepared and ready, but the Defendants were no-shows and made no such attempt.
This is Violation of a Court Order by the Defendants.

Violation of a Court Order by the Defendants #21

No later than 04/01/2023, a Pre-Trial Statement was to be served by the Defendants’ attorney. [EXHIBIT 3922, PP.5, 6 ¶8.]
WINDSOR was prepared and ready, but the Defendants made no such attempt.
This is Violation of a Court Order by the Defendants.

Violation of a Court Order by the Defendants #22

On 03/31/2023, a Joint Pre-Trial Conference was scheduled, but the Defendants were no-shows. [EXHIBIT 3922, P.2 ¶3.]
This is Violation of a Court Order by the Defendants.

Violation of a Court Order by the Defendants #23

AND JUDGE JEFFREY L. ASHTON

On 03/11/2023, there was a Motions Cut-Off-Deadline. [EXHIBIT 3922, PP.5, 6 ¶10.]
Judge Jeffrey L Ashton did not hear WINDSOR’s motions prior to this DEADLINE.
The Defendants filed the motion scheduled for hearing on 04/19/2023 on 03/24/2023, so it is void as it was filed after the Motions Cut-Off-Deadline. See 2018-CA-010270-O DOCKET, 03/24/2023.

Violation of a Court Order by the Defendants #23

On 04/04/2023, WINDSOR received a copy of an email to Keitra Davis from Renee Urban for the Defendants. It said:

“We have on our calendar the Pre-Trial Conference in this case set for Monday, April 10, 2022, at 9:00am. Can you please advise if this will be going forward, or if this will be cancelled as Plaintiff has not complied with Judge Ashton’s Order directing him to obtain counsel?” [EXHIBIT 2816.]

There was no response.
WINDSOR did not receive notice of the hearing and did not attend what he assumed was not taking place.
Since the Defendants learned something and did not notify WINDSOR, this should be considered a violation of a court order.

THE DEFENDANTS COMMITTED A VIOLATION OF THE FLORIDA RULES OF JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION BY FAILING TO SIGN THE MOTION

The motion to dismiss is unsigned and must be stricken.
A signature is not optional. The signature is much more than a person’s name.
There is the required signature on the Certificate of Service, but NOT on the MOTION. EVERY filing by WINDSOR will show he always properly signed. [2018-CA-010270-O DOCKET.]
Rule 2.515 of the Florida Rules of Judicial Administration dictates the requirement:

“Every document of a party represented by an attorney shall be signed by at least 1 attorney of record in that attorney’s individual name whose current record Florida Bar address, telephone number, including area code, primary e-mail address and secondary e-mail address, if any; and Florida Bar number shall be stated, and who shall be duly licensed to practice law in Florida or who shall have received permission to appear in the particular case as provided in rule 2.510. The ·attorney may be required by the court to give the address of, and to vouch for the attorney’s authority to represent, the party. Except when otherwise specifically provided by an applicable rule or statute, documents need not be verified or accompanied by affidavit. The signature of an attorney shall constitute a certificate by the attorney that:

(1) the attorney has read the document;

(2) to the best of the attorney’s knowledge, information; and belief, there is good ground to support the document;

(3) the document is not interposed for delay; and

(4) the document contains no confidential or sensitive information, or that any such confidential or sensitive information has been properly protected by complying with the provisions of rules 2.420 and 2.425. If a document is not signed or is signed with intent to defeat the purpose of this rule, it may be stricken and the action may proceed as though the document had not been served.”

Therefore, there is no proof that Attorney Jonathan Blake Mansker read the motion, and there is no certification that; to the best of his knowledge, information, and belief, there is good ground to support the motion.
There are many cases where pleadings were declared nullities because they were· not properly signed.

See Daytona Migi Corp. v. Daytona Automotive Fiberglass, Inc., 417 So.2d 272 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982) (holding a notice of appeal signed by a non-attorney corporate officer a nullity); Quinn v. Housing Auth. of Orlando, 385 So.2d 1167 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980) (reversing summary judgment in favor of corporate housing authority, holding its complaint signed and filed by a non-attorney void); Nicholson Supply Co. v. First Fed. Sav. & Loan Assoc., 184 So.2d 438 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1966) (affirming trial court’s striking of plaintiff corporation’s complaint holding the complaint a nullity where it was filed and signed by the corporation’s non-attorney president).

But with the filings in this case, there are no signatures at all.
This Court must sanction Attorney Jonathan Blake Mansker and the Defendants for this filing. This Court must vacate all orders granted with unsigned motions and strike their pleadings.

The MOTION alleges facts,

But it is not verified and must be stricken.

The Defendants’ Motion makes claims of fact in many paragraphs.
There is no affidavit, and claims of facts must be stricken.
Attorneys may not present facts, only legal arguments.

“Argument by counsel who is not under oath is not evidence.” See Murphy v. State, 667 So.2s 375 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); State v. T.A., 528 So.2d 974 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988); McKenney v. State, 967 So.2d 951, 32 Fla. L. Weekly D2375 (Fla.App. Dist.3 10/03/2007); Steinhardt v. InterCondominium Group, 771 So.2d 614, 25 Fla. L. Weekly D2713 (Fla.App. Dist.4 11/22/2000); SVI Capital, LLC v. Bank of America, N.A., 164 So.3d 36, 40 Fla.L.Weekly D 931 (Fla.App. Dist.4 04/22/2015); Daughtrey v. Daughtrey, 944 So.2d 1145, 31 Fla. L. Weekly D3080 (Fla.App. Dist.2 12/08/2006).)

“A trial court may not rely on argument by counsel to make factual determinations. Ordonez v. State, 862 So.2d 927, 930 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); see also State v. Thompson, 852 So.2d 877, 878 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003) (holding that argument of counsel is not evidence); DiSarrio v. Mills, 711 So.2d 1355, 1357 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998) (‘Argument by counsel who is not under oath is not evidence.’).” (State v. Jones, 30 So.3d 619, 35 Fla. L. Weekly D583 (Fla.App. Dist.2 03/12/2010).)

“A trial court may not rely on argument by counsel to make factual determinations.” State v. Jones, 30 So.3d 619, 622 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010) (first citing Ordonez v. State, 862 So.2d 927, 930 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); then citing State v. Thompson, 852 So.2d 877, 878 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003) (holding that argument of counsel is not evidence); and then citing DiSarrio v. Mills, 711 So.2d 1355, 1357 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998) (“Argument by counsel who is not under oath is not evidence.”). (State v. Crumbley, 2D16-3872, 2D16-3875 (Fla.App. Dist.2 05/23/2018).)

FORGERY, FRAUD, AND ORHER CRIMES by the Defendants

On 04/08/2023, WINDSOR logged in to the Florida E-Filing System. He happened to notice the email addresses displaying next to his name as the filer. It showed Jonathan Blake Mansker and his assistant, Renee Urban. [EXHIBIT 2819.] He is the attorney for the Defendants and she is his assistant in this case. They are two of the last people on earth whose email addresses WINDSOR would use on HIS ACCOUNT against them and Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton. Someone committed FORGERY and other crimes by giving control of WINDSOR’s filings to Jonathan Blake Mansker and Renee Urban. WINDSOR had to set up a new account to be able to e-file.
If any emails were sent to “Windsor” from 04/04/2023 to 6:30 p.m. on 04/08/2023, they went to the attorneys for the Defendants and were not copied to WINDSOR.
But at 9:40 a.m. on 04/10/2023, WINDSOR received a copy of an email to Keitra Davis from Renee Urban for the Defendants. It said:

“Good Morning – Pursuant to Judge Ashton’s instructions at this morning’s Pre-Trial Conference, please find the attached Notice of Hearing on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, along with a copy of the Motion.” [EXHIBIT 2817.]

WINDSOR was shocked. He knew nothing about a hearing. The purported motion attached was unreadable. WINDSOR requested a readable copy but there was no response.
This is a violation of the Florida Rules of Professional Conduct, and Blake Mansker and Renee Urban must be reported to law enforcement for these crimes.

MOTION FOR SANCTIONS AGAINST THE DEFENDANTS

AND THEIR ATTORNEYS

The Uniform Order for Setting the Case for Jury Trial provides for SANCTIONS. Failure to attend the meeting of attorneys required in paragraph 7(c), the Pre-Trial Conference, or trial or to otherwise strictly comply with the requirements of this Order may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions, including but not limited to, contempt, dismissal, default, striking of pleadings, exclusion of evidence, assessment of fees or costs. [EXHIBIT 3922, PP.7 ¶14.]
As shown above, the Defendants and their attorneys failed to attend and failed to strictly comply with the requirements of the Order.
The violations are egregious.
WINDSOR moves the Court to charge the Defendants and their attorneys with contempt, strike their pleadings, exclude and deny any evidence of the Defendants, and find for the Plaintiff on the issues of liability.

JUDGE JEFFREY L. ASHTON HAD NO JURISDICTION TO CONDUCT A

SECRET PRE-TRIAL HEARING, AND IT MUST BE STRICKEN

On 04/10/2023, Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton purportedly held a hearing in this case. It was allegedly a Pre-Trial Conference. It was kept a secret from WINDSOR, but the 10/21/2022 Order says parties SHALL attend. [EXHIBIT 3922, P.2 ¶5(b).]
On 04/10/2023 at 9:34 a.m., a DOCKET entry was made with a Notice of Hearing. [EXHIBIT 2821.] The notice did not specify what matter was to be heard.
On 04/10/2023 at 11:23 a.m., WINDSOR sent an email to Keitra Davis, Jeff Ashton, Tiffany Moore Russell, Lisa Shorten, Blake Mansker, Patty Nielsen, Steven Kranz, Scott Warburton, and Deputy Phillip McCord. [EXHIBIT 2820.] It said:

“I was not informed of a Pre-Trial Hearing. The order from 10/21/2022 set the date, but the 4/4/2023 email to Ms. Davis requesting directions on whether there would be a hearing was never responded to unless the response went to the person or persons who forged and stole my e-filing account.

“Please show me emails of all notifications that there was a hearing. I believe a party is obligated to attend, I darn sure would have been there.

“Please send me the name and contact information for the court reporter.

“None of the other prerequisites were complied with by the Defendants. There has been no designation of depositions, no meeting on jury instructions, no schedule of exhibits, no live meeting, no joint pre-trial statement, and violations galore.

“This motion or whatever it is is past the court-ordered deadline set in writing on 2/21/2023.

“Today’s filing violates the Court’s 2/21/2023 order. I move that all of the Defendants filings and Answer be stricken due to violation of court orders.

“The Notice of Hearing is false. It specifies nothing to be heard, and I am not self-represented. I have been denied that Constitutional right, and this is on appeal.

“A case may not be dismissed when on appeal. Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 9130 (f) Stay of Proceedings. In the absence of a stay, during the pendency of a review of a nonfinal order, the lower tribunal may proceed with all matters, including trial or final hearing, except that the lower tribunal may not render a final order disposing of the cause….

“Please vacate all of this.

“I am filing additional criminal charges. I extended the courtesy of calling Renee Urban today to give her the opportunity to deny that she was involved in the forgery and theft of my e-filing account. She refused to answer and refused to connect me with the Mansker. If Mansker doesn’t call me, I will take that as an indication of guilt. I will file criminal charges this week.

“Ms. Davis, were you involved in the forgery and theft? Was Barry5515?

“Please have Jonathan Blake Mansker call me. We have never spoken by phone. His assistant was unwilling to ask him to return my call.”

Windsor never received a response to any of these issues from any of the recipients.
Windsor never received any emails of all notifications that there was a hearing as he requested.
Windsor never received the name and contact information for the court reporter as he requested.
None of the other prerequisites were complied with by the Defendants.
The Notice of Hearing is false. It specifies nothing to be heard, and Windsor is not self-represented. Windsor has been denied that Constitutional right, and this is on appeal.
On 04/14/2023, Jury Instructions were due, but the Defendants failed to provide anything or respond to Windsor’s request.

A case may not be dismissed when on appeal.

A case may not be dismissed when on appeal. Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 9130 (f) Stay of Proceedings. In the absence of a stay, during the pendency of a review of a nonfinal order, the lower tribunal may proceed with all matters, including trial or final hearing, except that the lower tribunal may not render a final order disposing of the cause….
The Florida Supreme Court has explained that “the test employed by the appellate court to determine finality of an order, judgment or decree is whether the order in question constitutes an end to the judicial labor in the cause, and nothing further remains to be done by the court to effectuate terminate of the cause as between the parties directly affected.” L.T. Warehouse Co., 304 So. 2d at 99.
WINDSOR is filing additional criminal charges. I extended the courtesy of calling Renee Urban today to give her the opportunity to deny that she was involved in the forgery and theft of my e-filing account. She refused to answer and refused to connect me with the Mansker. If Mansker doesn’t call me, I will take that as an indication of guilt. I will file criminal charges this week.
WINDSOR emailed Keitra Davis to ask: “Ms. Davis, were you involved in the forgery and theft? Was Barry5515? There was no response.
Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton abused his discretion repeatedly in this case.
WINDSOR was never served with a Notice of Hearing on 04/10/2023. The magnitude of the violations by the DEFENDANTS is extreme. See the Affidavit of WINDSOR filed on 2/20/2023. [EXHIBIT 2824.]
Windsor moves that all of theDefendants filings and Answer be stricken due to violation of court orders.

RESPONSE TO MOTION OF DEFENDANTS

The Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss. It violated a number of ordered and rules, and it is simply false and unfounded.
WINDSOR has now lost the use of both hands for typing, so he does not have time to respond to this bogus Motion.

PRAYER FOR RELIEF

Wherefore, WINDSOR moves the Court for an order striking the setting of an April 19, 2023 hearing; providing all the relief requested above; striking all unsupported statements of fact; striking all unauthenticated exhibits; striking the pleadings of the DEFENDANTS; and granting such other and further relief as is deemed just and proper.

This 18th day of April 2023,

/s/ William M. Windsor

William M. Windsor

5013 S Louise Ave #1134

Sioux Falls, South Dakota 57108

Jeff Ashton Violates Rules and Prepares to Deliver Death Blow to William M Windsor

WTF Jeff Ashton

I received an email on 4/11/2023 saying there was a Pre-Trial Hearing on 4/11/2023 in my attempted murder 18-wheeler case. [APPENDIX 140.]

I was not informed of a Pre-Trial Hearing. The order setting pre-trial procedures and deadlines from 10/21/2022 set the date, but a 4/4/2023 email to Ms. Keitra Davis, Judicial Assistant to Jeff Ashton, requesting directions on whether there would be a hearing. [APPENDIX 137.] This was never responded to unless the response went to the person or persons who forged and stole my e-filing account. [APPENDIX 138.]

I have asked all of the evildoers to please show me emails of all notifications that there was a hearing. I believe a party is obligated to attend, I darn sure would have been there. There are no such emails. [APPENDIX 141.]

I asked to be sent the name and contact information for the court reporter. There has been no response.

None of the other prerequisites were complied with by the Defendants. There has been no designation of depositions, no meeting on jury instructions, no schedule of exhibits, no live meeting, no joint pre-trial statement, and violations galore.

This motion or whatever it is is that they filed on 4/11/2023 is past the court-ordered deadline set in writing on 2/21/2023. [APPENDIX 133.]

The 4/11/2023 filing violates the Court’s 2/21/2023 order. I moved via email that all of the Defendants’ filings and Answer be stricken due to violation of court orders. There has been no response.

The Notice of Hearing is false. It specifies nothing to be heard, and I am not self-represented. I have been denied that Constitutional right, and this is on appeal.

[APPENDIX 142.]

A case may not be dismissed when on appeal.

Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 9130 (f) Stay of Proceedings. “In the absence of a stay, during the pendency of a review of a nonfinal order, the lower tribunal may proceed with all matters, including trial or final hearing, except that the lower tribunal may not render a final order disposing of the cause…”

I asked the evildoers to please vacate all of this. There has been no response.

I advised them that I am filing additional criminal charges. I extended the courtesy of calling Renee Urban of Adams | Coogler on 4/11/2023 to give her the opportunity to deny that she was involved in the forgery and theft of my e-filing account. She refused to answer and refused to connect me with purported attorney Jonathan Blake Mansker. If Mansker doesn’t call me, I will take that as an indication of guilt. I will file criminal charges. There has been no response.

I asked Ms. Keitra Davis, assistant to Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton, if she was involved in the forgery and theft? Was Barry5515? (That’s reported by media to be Jeff Ashton’s sex sites email.) There has been no response.

I asked that Jonathan Blake Mansker please call me. We have never spoken by phone. His assistant was unwilling to ask him to return my call. There has been no response.

The hearing to purportedly dismiss my case is set for April 19, 2023 at 9 a.m. in the Ninth Judicial Circuit in Orange County Florida. If you would like to be an Internet courtwatcher, please email Keitra Davis at 37orange@ninthcircuit.org.

If some of you are associated with courtwatcher groups, please notify them.

Bill Windsor’s NEW BOOK

RICO for Judges — RICO — Methods to ensure pro se parties will LOSE in your court

RICO — METHODS TO ENSURE PRO SE PARTIES WILL LOSE IN YOUR COURT.

Featuring many mentions of Jeff “RICO” Ashton.

This handbook explains the techniques that the judges in America use to screw Pro Se parties.

Every judge is supposed to know all of this.

Attorneys need to know this so they won’t miss an opportunity to set up the Pro Se Schmucks.

Pro Se parties need to know this to document the wrongdoing of your judge.

People of all ages need to know this to understand there is only INjustice in Lawless America.

The book is complete. I just need to jump through a few of the hoops at Amazon Publishing.

Each technique is a numbered chapter, so members of the Criminal Racketeering Organization in your area can just talk in code. “I think we need a #12.” “Or how ’bout a #1 followed up by a #2 ?”

Number 2 is one that Jeff Ashton just loves.

This handbook has been 14 years in development with tried-and-tested input from judges in every state.

The author, William M. Windsor, is well-known by many of the corrupt judges nationwide.

Order forms will be emailed to every attorney in America and sent to every courthouse. Special autographed copies will be available to all us Schmucks.

Jeff Ashton would not know Due Process if it bit him on his Member

Jeff Ashton would not know Due Process if it bit him on his Member.

Jeff Ashton is a crook. Only a corrupt, miserable excuse for a human being would claim to deprive Bill Windsor or anyone else of their Constitutional rights to due process maliciously and blatantly.

“Due process basically requires that a person who is deprived of a recognized right must be given some sort of notice and an opportunity for a hearing on the government’s action.” Jeff Ashton took away Bill Windsor’s right to represent himself sua sponte (Self-initiated by a court). There was NO NOTICE and NO OPPORTUNITY TO BE HEARD. And there was no factual basis or legal basis.

“At a minimum, a person who will be deprived of a right is entitled to a fair decision-making process by an impartial decision-maker.” Jeff Ashton is unfair, stupid, and committed to killing Bill Windsor with his violations.

Jeffrey L. Ashton's Ashley Madison Girl? — Jeffrey L. Ashton’s Ashley Madison Girl?

I need to see if I can get one of his Ashley Madison girlfriends to stop by, bite him on his Vienna Sausage, and explain DUE PROCESS.

Bill Windsor is suing all 69 Judges and their Bond Agent in Orange County Florida

69 Demand Letters were sent to Jeff Ashton’s fellow judges by William Michael Windsor. No one responded. So, yesterday, each judge was sent an email advising them that they and their bonding company are being sued.

The bond protects against:

“…conduct or omissions made by public officials that constitute a breach of his or her duties of the office. The bond serves as a guarantee against fraud or dishonesty and covers losses arising from neglect or other serious offenses.”

The emails say this:

I AM PREPARING TO SUE EACH OF YOU FOR VIOLATIONS OF YOUR OATH OF OFFICE AND VIOLATION OF YOUR BOND.

Please save this disabled 74-year-old one-handed man some time by responding to this email with a copy of your bond.

Please notify your bonding company that this is coming and that I will be seeking at least eight figures (##,###,###.##). You may want to let them know that the judge infamous for his Ashley Madison sexual involvement and losing the Casey Anthony case is responsible for your involvement.

William M. Windsor

5013 S Louise Ave #1134
Sioux Falls, SD 57108

352-661-8472

windsorinsouthdakota@yahoo.com

This email was written with only one finger because I no longer have the use of my left hand. Please excuse typos.

IMPEACH JEFF ASHTON.

See Jeffrey L. Ashton Home – Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton

The letters sent previously said this:

I believe Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton is either mentally impaired or as corrupt as they come, or both. He has violated the Codes, Rules, laws, and even the Cub Scout Oath. You have a duty to report him.

Please read my Affidavit or Petition. There are links on www.JeffreyLAshton.com I will be adding more evidence and charges. My Affidavit tells the story of one violation and abuse after another, though I haven’t gone into detail for the past year because he has committed one horrendous denial of due process that should get him removed.

His latest is a VOID ORDER depriving me of my Constitutional rights (EXHIBIT A). He claims to have revoked my right to represent myself in 2018-CA-010270-O without any notice or opportunity to be heard. The case law cited as authority by him establishes that what he did is illegal. He has abused me every way possible.

My personal injury case was supposed to go to trial after just over six years on May 22, 2023. I believe Jeffrey L. Ashton hopes I die before this can go to trial.

I need a new judge, and Jeffrey L. Ashton needs mental health help and a new job.

My life was destroyed on 5/5/2017 by an 18-wheeler. I was in good health and had never been in a car wreck, but now I’m 74 years old, have five herniated discs in my neck, four in my back, and Diastasis Recti, an allegedly inoperable abdominal injury.

It keeps getting worse. I recently lost the use of my left hand, and I can no longer walk. I can’t obtain medical treatment as I’m in bankruptcy and Medicare and others say the lawsuit has to be resolved first. The Defendants have ZERO evidence or testimony on liability admitted under oath, but they refuse to amend their fraudulent pleadings or admit liability. I suspect this is because they know they have Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton’s protection. The young attorney for the Defendants needs to go to acting school as he gave it away.

I have reason to suspect that Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton has been conspiring with the Defendants. I submit that he is part of a RICO organization. I hope you aren’t.

I am notifying every judge in the Ninth Circuit in hopes I will find good ones, like Judge Elizabeth Starr, who will take action. Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton has committed felonies and scores an F- on adherence to the Code of Judicial Conduct. He has violated every Canon. He has violated Rule 4-8.3(b) and Rule 4-8.4 of the Florida Rules of Professional Conduct. I am asking you to report him as is your duty pursuant to Canon 3E, Fla. Code Jud. Conduct, and Rule 2.160, Fla. R. Jud. Admin., as well as Rules Regulating the Florida Bar 3-4.2, 3-4.3, and 3-4.4.

Canon 3D (1) requires: “A judge who receives information or has actual knowledge that substantial likelihood exists that another judge has committed a violation of this Code shall take appropriate action.”

Canon 3E, Fla. Code Jud. Conduct, and Rule 2.160, Fla. R. Jud. Admin., mandate that a judge disqualify himself in a proceeding “in which the judge’s impartiality might reasonably be questioned.” He hasn’t, so you must act.

I don’t want to come across as rude when seeking your help, but I must refer you to 18 U.S.C. 4. I intend to file complaints and sue every judge in the Ninth Circuit who does not report Jeffrey L. Ashton with a copy to me as proof. If I don’t receive confirmation that you have reported him, I will sue you after first filing a complaint against you with the Judicial Commission.

Please send me your ISLN Number and a copy of your Oath and Bond.

I hope this will become a national news story. My father was CEO of WFTV Channel 9, and there are still people there who worked with him. And Casey Anthony, Ashley Madison, and other “sexy” news stories should make this a slam dunk when I, a disabled veteran who almost died on the Florida Turnpike, was denied a most fundamental Constitutional right, and am suing Jeffrey L. Ashton to create a non-profit to finance the 68% of us who cannot afford attorneys.

Please look for me in and around the Orange County Courthouse. My hair is gray, and my Walker is red and black. I will be protesting and gathering more evidence against Judge Jeffrey L. Ashley, or is it Ashton. I had no idea he was infamous until a few days ago.

Do you automatically get disqualified as a juror in voir dire if you know about the judge and think he’s a scumbag? Between those who know about Casey Anthony, Ashley Madison, and the Cub Scouts, we may not be able to seat a jury.

Sincerely,

William M. Windsor, Pro Se (at least used to be)

5013 S Louise Avenue #1134, Sioux Falls, SD 57108, bill@billwindsor.com — ###-###-####

P.S. I now live in a trailer in Lake Panasoffkee. My mail gets forwarded from South Dakota, so email is better.

Motion to Disqualify Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton filed 3/17/2023

I filed a Motion to Disqualify Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton on 3/17/2023.

I also filed the required Certificate of Good Faith.

I have now filed the Affidavit of Prejudice.

Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton is a bad man who must be removed from office.

How does Judge Jeff Ashton avoid Recusal if he’s so Dishonest

Judge Jeff Ashton is a crook. He lies, cheats, and destroys government property.

Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton hasn’t been recused or disqualified in Case 20`18-CA-0`10270-O despite at least a half dozen demands and requests by Plaintiff William Windsor. He avoids removal by lying, cheating, and having government property destroyed. CRIMINAL ACTIVITY.

Other pro se plaintiffs probably experience similar wrongdoing but don’t know what they can or should do.

I encourage all pro se parties (as a friend) to save everything you receive via email or snail mail, scan them and name them, and save them. pdf is your friend.

On 4/1/2021 at 05-29-58-AM, I filed my second written effort to get Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton removed. It was in my EXHIBITS folder, so it took just a second to find it after days of indexing all of my files for search in File Explorer.

I never delete email. So, today, I realized I needed to see if I still had emails from 4/1/2021. It took a while, but I found the Orange County Clerk’s Proof of Filing and Service, filed 4/1/2021 at 05-30 AM. HALLELUJAH!!!

Now I need to see it on the DOCKET! so, off I go online to the Clerk’s search site.

IT’S NOT ON THE DOCKET.

WTF.

Fortunately, I learned years ago that corrupt judges and corrupt court clerks delete docket entries that are problematic for judges and beneficial to litigants. I used to make copies of the dockets regularly, but too many 18-wheeler accidents and too many people to help. So, I wasn’t confident as I checked my massive files. But I have a 2021 pdf of the Docket when it showed that filing!!!!! Go to 4/1/2021.

Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton is a crook. He stole or had someone steal those documents. He has obstructed justice. I am just beginning to research all the crimes. I wonder if he used his skillful tongue, fingers, or member to make the theft, or did he use an accomplice?

Florida Statutes 839.13 – Falsifying records

(1) Except as provided in subsection (2), if any judge, justice, mayor, alderman, clerk, sheriff, coroner, or other public officer, or employee or agent of or contractor with a public agency, or any person whatsoever, shall steal, embezzle, alter, corruptly withdraw, falsify or avoid any record, process, charter, gift, grant, conveyance, or contract, or any paper filed in any judicial proceeding in any court of this state, or shall knowingly and willfully take off, discharge or conceal any issue, forfeited recognizance, or other forfeiture, or other paper above mentioned, or shall forge, deface, or falsify any document or instrument recorded, or filed in any court, or any registry, acknowledgment, or certificate, or shall fraudulently alter, deface, or falsify any minutes, documents, books, or any proceedings whatever of or belonging to any public office within this state; or if any person shall cause or procure any of the offenses aforesaid to be committed, or be in anywise concerned therein, the person so offending shall be guilty of a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.

Attorney’s Note

Under the Florida Statutes, punishments for crimes depend on the classification. In the case of this section:

Class	Prison	Fine
Felony of the second degree	up to 15 years	up to $10,000
Felony of the third degree	up to 5 years	up to $5,000
misdemeanor of the first degree	up to 1 year	up to $1,000

For details, see Fla. Stat. § 775.082(3)(d), Fla. Stat. § 775.082(3)(e) and Fla. Stat. § 775.082(4)(a)

The fact that I am a disabled senior may add additional charges.

https://www.flsenate.gov/Laws/Statutes/2019/812.014

https://www.flsenate.gov/Laws/Statutes/2018/0028.211

https://www.flsenate.gov/Laws/Statutes/2018/0119.021

https://www.flsenate.gov/Laws/Statutes/2022/499.68

Probably a federal crime or two.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1519

Tiffany Moore Russell has a problem. Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton’s Judicial Assistant, Keitra Davis, may be an accomplice. I have now sent both of them notices of violations under color of law.

I will be sending this to every judge in the Ninth District and to David H. Harris, General Counsel, Ninth Judicial Circuit Court of Florida, Ctaddh1@ocnjcc.org.

If there are felonies involved, David Harris, Lisa Munyon, and every judge has a duty to report these, or it is a violation of 18 USC 4.

I have reported this to the Orlando Police Department, The Orange County Sheriff, the Attorney General, the Governor, the FBI, the U.S. Department of Justice, the United States Attorney General, Ashley Madison, FriendFinder, and the Cub Scouts.

Read the 797 Day Report.

69 Demand Letters have been sent to Jeff Ashton’s Co-workers

69 Demand Letters have been sent to Jeff Ashton’s fellow judges by William Michael Windsor.

The letters say this:

My personal injury case was supposed to go to trial after just over six years on May 22, 2023. I believe Jeffrey L. Ashton hopes I die before this can go to trial.

I need a new judge, and Jeffrey L. Ashton needs mental health help and a new job.

I have reason to suspect that Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton has been conspiring with the Defendants. I submit that he is part of a RICO organization. I hope you aren’t.

Please send me your ISLN Number and a copy of your Oath and Bond.

Sincerely,

William M. Windsor, Pro Se (at least used to be)

5013 S Louise Avenue #1134, Sioux Falls, SD 57108, bill@billwindsor.com — ###-###-####

P.S. I now live in a trailer in Lake Panasoffkee. My mail gets forwarded from South Dakota, so email is better.

Bill Windsor Sworn Affidavit – Part 3

Click here for a pdf of the full Affidavit of Prejudice.

Continued from Bill Windsor Sworn Affidavit – Part 2

Canon 1 of the Florida Code of Judicial Conduct: A JUDGE SHALL UPHOLD THE INTEGRITY AND INDEPENDENCE OF THE JUDICIARY: An independent and honorable judiciary is indispensable to justice in our society. A judge should participate in establishing, maintaining, and enforcing high standards of conduct, and shall personally observe those standards so that the integrity and independence of the judiciary may be preserved. The provisions of this Code should be construed and applied to further that objective.
The Commentary says: “Deference to the judgments and rulings of courts depends upon public confidence in the integrity and independence of judges. The integrity and independence of judges depend in turn upon their acting without fear or favor. Although judges should be independent, they must comply with the law, including the provisions of this Code. Public confidence in the impartiality of the judiciary is maintained by the adherence of each judge to this responsibility. Conversely, violation of this Code diminishes public confidence in the judiciary and thereby does injury to the system of government under law.
Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton is not honorable. He maintains the lowest possible standards. He does not comply with the law or the Code of Judicial Conduct. My only confidence is that Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton should be removed as a judge and disbarred. He is a menace to the citizens of the State of Florida.
Canon 2 A JUDGE SHALL AVOID IMPROPRIETY AND THE APPEARANCE OF IMPROPRIETY IN ALL OF THE JUDGE’S ACTIVITIES: A. A judge shall respect and comply with the law and shall act at all times in a manner that promotes public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary.
The Commentary on Canon 2A says: “Irresponsible or improper conduct by judges erodes public confidence in the judiciary. A judge must avoid all impropriety and appearance of impropriety. A judge must expect to be the subject of constant public scrutiny. A judge must therefore accept restrictions on the judge’s conduct that might be viewed as burdensome by the ordinary citizen and should do so freely and willingly. Examples are the restrictions on judicial speech imposed by Sections 3B(9) and (10) that are indispensable to the maintenance of the integrity, impartiality, and independence of the judiciary. The prohibition against behaving with impropriety or the appearance of impropriety applies to both the professional and personal conduct of a judge. Because it is not practicable to list all prohibited acts, the proscription is necessarily cast in general terms that extend to conduct by judges that is harmful although not specifically mentioned in the Code. Actual improprieties under this standard include violations of law, court rules, or other specific provisions of this Code. The test for appearance of impropriety is whether the conduct would create in reasonable minds, with knowledge of all the relevant circumstances that a reasonable inquiry would disclose, a perception that the judge’s ability to carry out judicial responsibilities with integrity, impartiality, and competence is impaired.
Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton gets an “F” on complying with the law and acting in a manner that promotes public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary. ANY reasonable mind, with knowledge of all the relevant circumstances that a reasonable inquiry would disclose, would find that Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton’s ability to carry out judicial responsibilities with integrity, impartiality, and competence is impaired. He has no integrity. He is hopelessly biased against me, and he may be absolutely incompetent to serve as a judge. He may be mentally ill.
Canon 3 – A JUDGE SHALL PERFORM THE DUTIES OF JUDICIAL OFFICE IMPARTIALLY AND DILIGENTLY: (4) A judge shall be patient, dignified, and courteous to litigants, jurors, witnesses, lawyers, and others with whom the judge deals in an official capacity, and shall require similar conduct of lawyers, and of staff, court officials, and others subject to the judge’s direction and control. (5) A judge shall perform judicial duties without bias or prejudice. A judge shall not, in the performance of judicial duties, by words or conduct manifest bias or prejudice, including but not limited to bias or prejudice based upon race, sex, religion, national origin, disability, age, sexual orientation, or socioeconomic status, and shall not permit staff, court officials, and others subject to the judge’s direction and control to do so. This section does not preclude the consideration of race, sex, religion, national origin, disability, age, sexual orientation, socioeconomic status, or other similar factors when they are issues in the proceeding. (8) A judge shall dispose of all judicial matters promptly, efficiently, and fairly.
Administrative Responsibilities: (1) A judge shall diligently discharge the judge’s administrative responsibilities without bias or prejudice and maintain professional competence in judicial administration, and should cooperate with other judges and court officials in the administration of court business. (2) A judge shall require staff, court officials, and others subject to the judge’s direction and control to observe the standards of fidelity and diligence that apply to the judge and to refrain from manifesting bias or prejudice in the performance of their official duties.
Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton and his Judicial Assistant, Keitra Davis, are both biased liars.
Disqualification: (1) A judge shall disqualify himself or herself in a proceeding in which the judge’s impartiality might reasonably be questioned, including but not limited to instances where: (a) the judge has a personal bias or prejudice concerning a party or a party’s lawyer, or personal knowledge of disputed evidentiary facts concerning the proceeding.
Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton’s impartiality has been proven, not just “reasonably questioned.” Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton must disqualify himself.
Commentary to 3B(5): A judge must perform judicial duties impartially and fairly. A judge who manifests bias on any basis in a proceeding impairs the fairness of the proceeding and brings the judiciary into disrepute. Facial expression and body language, in addition to oral communication, can give to parties or lawyers in the proceeding, jurors, the media and others an appearance of judicial bias. A judge must be alert to avoid behavior that may be perceived as prejudicial. Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton is either so mentally ill or so self-righteous that he does and says improper things regularly expecting no repercussions.
Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton is not impartial, and he has done nothing fairly in regard to me and my case. By manifesting his bias in a variety of ways, he has impaired the fairness of the proceeding and has brought the judiciary into disrepute. Facial expression and body language at the 4/5/2021 hearing, in addition to oral communication, gave me and the lawyers in the proceeding the appearance of judicial bias. The same goes for other hearings.
Commentary to 3E(1): Under this rule, a judge is disqualified whenever the judge’s impartiality might reasonably be questioned, regardless of whether any of the specific rules in Section 3E(1) apply.
Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton is DISQUALIFIED.
At the hearing on 4/5/2021, Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton established his bias against me as a senior citizen and a person with a disability:
WINDSOR: “Sorry, Your Honor. I do suffer from a cognitive decline that makes it impossible for me to remember if I just took my pills.
THE COURT: “Well, sir, since you’ve raised that, if you suffer from that cognitive decline so that you can — as you said you can’t remember — you have no short-term memory, how is it that you can represent yourself if you can’t remember whether you took your pills a few minutes ago?” [APPENDIX 82 – Transcript – P. 21: 4-12.]
All I want is to have someone fair and impartial with an open mind to listen to the facts and review as much of the evidence as is needed to prove each of my claims. It is established that Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton doesn’t care about the facts and doesn’t want to apply the law.
The United States Constitution allegedly guarantees an unbiased judge who will always provide litigants with full protection of ALL RIGHTS. Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton is biased against me. Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton has demonstrated this.
My motions, affidavits, certificates of good faith, and memorandum of authorities meet the requirements for a motion to disqualify.
This Affidavit of Prejudice states the facts and the reasons for the belief that bias and prejudice exist. The reasons for the belief are material and stated with particularity.
On 1/5/2023, a deposition was held with Florida Highway Patrol Trooper Gregory S. Linzmayer. I believe Trooper Gregory S. Linzmayer has committed crimes relative to this case. When I began to cross-examine him, I asked if he had an attorney. He didn’t. He refused to answer my questions. He was supposed to resume his deposition when he had legal counsel, but he never did.
On 2/10/2023, a hearing was held on my Motion for Contempt against Trooper Gregory S. Linzmayer. It was denied. Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton said I THREATENED the Trooper and told a large group “I don’t believe for a second what you say.” These are clear violations of the Code of Judicial Conduct.
On 2/21/2023, there were supposed to be two hearings in this case. I happened to notice a standard efiling notice hit my in-box. I opened it, and I was surprised to see the hearings canceled. I was SHOCKED to see that Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton entered an order allegedly revoking my right to self-representation. [EXHIBIT A.] This had never been discussed, and there was no notice or opportunity to be heard. The judge had no jurisdiction to do what he did. It is a void order. The cases cited as “authority” by Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton both indicate it’s a denial of due process to do what he did without notice and an opportunity to be heard. So he takes an action that is a violation of my Constitutional rights, and he does it in an order citing cases that establish he can’t do what he had just done.
Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton knows the DEFENDANTS are liable, so he needs to dismiss my case before my Motion for Partial Summary Judgment can be heard. He knows I have been unable to obtain an attorney. By requiring me to have an attorney, he knows I will not be able to comply with his order and will lose.
The accident has given me five herniated discs in my neck, four in my back, and an abdominal injury, Diastasis Recti. I have lost all sense of balance. I have fallen dozens of times. When I fall, I can’t get up. I can no longer walk unaided. I am always in pain unless seated in a special chair. I have lost the use of my left hand, and I have gone from a two-finger typist to a one-finger typist. I am always in pain. I live alone in a trailer, and I have no help. I am denied medical care (Medicare) because the case is still pending. I am bankrupt. Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton knows all of this, and it seems he is ready for me to die injured and bankrupt.
My case will be dismissed because I can’t obtain an attorney. Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton is well aware of this. This is why he did what he did on 2/21/2023.
Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton could be mentally ill. Or he is simply a corrupt narcissist. Or he has been bribed to do whatever it takes. One thing’s for sure, he has committed a significant number of violations of the Code of Judicial Conduct. He needs to be removed and disbarred.

FURTHER SAITH AFFIANT NOT.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed this 24th day of February, 2023,

__________________________________

William M. Windsor

DECLARATION

Pursuant to Florida Statute 92.525, under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing document and that all facts in it are true.

This 24th day of February, 2023,

___________________________

William M. Windsor

Bill Windsor Sworn Affidavit – Part 1 Bill Windsor Sworn Affidavit – Part 2 Bill Windsor Sworn Affidavit – Part 3

My name is William Michael Windsor. This is my story, and I’m stickin’ to it. Copyright 2013, William Michael Windsor. See http://LawlessAmerica.com, http://facebook.com/billwindsor1, and http://youtube.com/lawlessamerica.

Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton is a HUGE Liar

THE COURT (Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton): “Mr. Windsor, you e-mailed my JA 214 times since Thursday. Since Thursday.

WINDSOR: “Absolutely not, Your Honor.

THE COURT (Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton): “Well, you’re calling my secretary a liar and I know that she’s telling me the truth about that, so that ain’t going to happen. So I’ll block you from e-mail, again. If you have a lawyer that wants to communicate with us on your behalf, we will be happy to speak with him.” [EXHIBIT A – Transcript of Hearing 4/5/2021 – P.36: 9-25; P.37: 1-25; P.38: 1-4.]

I sent three emails to Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton’s Judicial Assistant from Thursday April 1, 2021 to Monday April 5, 2021. THREE (3) not 214. Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton is a liar, and calling me a liar in open court is a violation of the Code of Judicial Conduct.

I have every email saved on my computer, and I will be filing each and every one of them with the clerk as evidence.

I am not and will not receive a fair trial in the Ninth Judicial Circuit Court in Orange County, Florida due to the bias of Judge Jeffrey L. Ashton of that court against me and prejudice in favor of the Defendants and their attorney.